World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
25381
World Ranking
10622
National Ranking
1017

Nicholas W. Read publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas W. Read sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 284 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nicholas W. Read D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas W. Read sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicholas W. Read is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their academic work is connected to this institution, reflecting an active role in research and scholarship within an established university environment.

Information regarding recent papers authored by Nicholas W. Read, co-authors, publication venues, fields of study, subfields, or main topics covered in their research is not provided. Likewise, there are no listed book publications or awards attributed to their name in the available data.

Due to the absence of specific research topics, publications, or scientific contributions in the dataset, a detailed analysis or summary of their scholarly output cannot be made. The profile therefore is limited to their professional affiliation.

Best Publications

  • The role of psychological and biological factors in postinfective gut dysfunction

    Gwee Ka;Leong Yl;Graham C;McKendrick Mw

  • Psychometric scores and persistence of irritable bowel after infectious diarrhoea

    K.A Gwee;N.W Read;J.C Graham;M.W McKendrick

  • Increased rectal mucosal expression of interleukin 1β in recently acquired post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome

    Gwee Ka;Collins Sm;Read Nw;Rajnakova A

  • The cost-effectiveness of psychotherapy and paroxetine for severe irritable bowel syndrome.

    Francis Creed;Lakshmi Fernandes;Elspeth Guthrie;Stephen Palmer

  • Chronic diarrhea of unknown origin

    Nicholas W. Read;Guenter J. Krejs;Maria G. Read;Carol A. Santa Ana

  • Effect of infusion of nutrient solutions into the ileum on gastrointestinal transit and plasma levels of neurotensin and enteroglucagon

    N.W. Read;N.W. Read;A. McFarlane;A. McFarlane;R.I. Kinsman;R.I. Kinsman;T.E. Bates;T.E. Bates

  • Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgency.

    Maria Read;N. W. Read;D. C. Barber;H. L. Duthie

  • A clinical study of patients with fecal incontinence and diarrhea.

    Nicholas W. Read;William V. Harford;A. Carl Schmulen;Maria G. Read

  • Epidemic gastritis with hypochlorhydria

    E.J. Ramsey;E.J. Ramsey;E.J. Ramsey;K.V. Carey;K.V. Carey;K.V. Carey;W.L. Peterson;W.L. Peterson;W.L. Peterson;J.J. Jackson;J.J. Jackson;J.J. Jackson

  • British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of the irritable bowel syndrome

    J Jones;J Boorman;P Cann;A Forbes

  • Relationship of the motor activity of the antrum, pylorus, and duodenum to gastric emptying of a solid-liquid mixed meal

    L.A. Houghton;L.A. Houghton;N.W. Read;N.W. Read;R. Heddle;R. Heddle;M. Horowitz;M. Horowitz

  • Effect of ileal and intravenous infusions of fat emulsions on feeding and satiety in human volunteers.

    I. Welch;K. Saunders;N.W. Read

  • Studies on the mechanism of bowel disturbance in ulcerative colitis.

    S.S.C. Rao;N.W. Read;C. Brown;C. Bruce

  • Anal hypertonia in fissures: Cause or effect?

    C P Gibbons;N W Read

  • Effect of aging on anorectal function.

    J J Bannister;L Abouzekry;N W Read

  • Reduction of rectal sensitivity and post-prandial motility by granisetron, a 5 HT3-receptor antagonist, in patients with irritable bowel syndrome

    A. Prior;N. W. Read

  • Motor mechanisms associated with slowing of the gastric emptying of a solid meal by an intraduodenal lipid infusion.

    R. Heddle;P. J. Collins;M. Horowitz

  • Sensory and motor responses to rectal distention vary according to rate and pattern of balloon inflation

    Wei Ming Sun;Nicholas W. Read;Alison Prior;Jo-Anne Daly

  • Impairment of defecation in young women with severe constipation

    N.W. Read;J.M. Timms;L.J. Barfield;T.C. Donnelly

  • Psychometric scores and persistence of irritable bowel after infectious diarrhoea

    K.A. Gwee;J.C. Graham;M.W. Mckendrick;S.M. Collins

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Horowitz
Michael Horowitz University of Adelaide
Brian H. Brown
Brian H. Brown University of Sheffield
Alexander C. McFarlane
Alexander C. McFarlane University of Adelaide
Guy J. Maddern
Guy J. Maddern University of Adelaide
Thoru Yamada
Thoru Yamada University of Iowa
Ian T. Johnson
Ian T. Johnson Norwich Research Park
Francis Creed
Francis Creed University of Manchester
Gary A. Wittert
Gary A. Wittert University of Adelaide
Elspeth Guthrie
Elspeth Guthrie University of Leeds
David G. Thompson
David G. Thompson University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens up a range of online degree pathways and career options for those interested in healthcare, beyond the traditional MD. Many students pursue accelerated nursing, pharmacy, or allied health careers. For example, a 1 year dnp program online is ideal for experienced nurses seeking to advance to leadership or clinical specialist roles in a condensed format.

If pharmacy is your passion, attending the best online pharmacy school can pave the way to becoming a licensed pharmacist, combining flexible study with rigorous training.

For those interested in the intersection of technology and healthcare, degrees in health informatics have become increasingly popular. These programs prepare students to manage healthcare data, electronic records, and emerging digital solutions.

Finally, billing and coding classes online offer a fast and affordable route into a vital healthcare support profession, with plenty of opportunities for advancement and remote work. Online routes make it easier than ever to get started in healthcare—no matter your background.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas W. Read

Recently Published Articles