World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 46 4221 3879 1635 1452 173 7957

Nathaniel G. Plant publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nathaniel G. Plant between 1991 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nathaniel G. Plant published across 32 years, from 1991 to 2022, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2014. 5 of the 188 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2014. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications
1991 2022

188 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nathaniel G. Plant: publications per year, 1991 to 2022
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 2
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 3
1998 2
1999 6
2000 0
2001 9
2002 3
2003 4
2004 5
2005 2
2006 5
2007 3
2008 3
2009 5
2010 6
2011 12
2012 6
2013 12
2014 23
2015 15
2016 13
2017 8
2018 12
2019 14
2020 8
2021 3
2022 2
Total 188
Download as CSV

Nathaniel G. Plant publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathaniel G. Plant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 173 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490 173
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Nathaniel G. Plant D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathaniel G. Plant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212 46
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nathaniel G. Plant is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a particular emphasis on subfields such as Earth-Surface Processes, Ecology, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecological Modeling.

The main topics addressed in Nathaniel G. Plant's work include:

  • Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Aeolian processes and effects
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Avian ecology and behavior

Their recent publications cover a range of issues related to coastal environments and ecological processes. Selected recent papers include:

  • "Blind testing of shoreline evolution models," 2020, published in Scientific Reports
  • "The Roles of Storminess and Sea Level Rise in Decadal Barrier Island Evolution," 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Piping plovers demonstrate regional differences in nesting habitat selection patterns along the U.S. Atlantic coast," 2021, Ecosphere
  • "Satellite-Derived Barrier Response and Recovery Following Natural and Anthropogenic Perturbations, Northern Chandeleur Islands, Louisiana," 2021, Remote Sensing
  • "Development and Application of an Empirical Dune Growth Model for Evaluating Barrier Island Recovery from Storms," 2020, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering

Nathaniel G. Plant has frequently published in venues including:

  • Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World
  • Scientific Reports
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Remote Sensing
  • Journal of Marine Science and Engineering

The scientist has collaborated regularly with several co-authors over multiple projects. Frequent co-authors are:

  • P. Soupy Dalyander
  • Rangley C. Mickey
  • Sara L. Zeigler
  • Davina L. Passeri
  • Joseph W. Long

Best Publications

  • Practical use of video imagery in nearshore oceanographic field studies

    K.T. Holland;R.A. Holman;T.C. Lippmann;J. Stanley

  • Two-dimensional time dependent hurricane overwash and erosion modeling at Santa Rosa Island

    R.T. McCall;J.S.M. Van Thiel de Vries;N.G. Plant;A.R. Van Dongeren

  • Intertidal beach profile estimation using video images

    Nathaniel G. Plant;Rob A. Holman

  • A simple model for interannual sandbar behavior

    N. G. Plant;R. A. Holman;M. H. Freilich;W. A. Birkemeier

  • cBathy: A robust algorithm for estimating nearshore bathymetry

    Rob Holman;Nathaniel Plant;Todd Holland

  • Observations of nearshore crescentic sandbars

    I. M. J. van Enckevort;B. G. Ruessink;Giovanni Coco;Giovanni Coco;K. Suzuki

  • A Bayesian network to predict coastal vulnerability to sea level rise

    Benjamin T. Gutierrez;Nathaniel G. Plant;E. Robert Thieler

  • Analysis of the scale of errors in nearshore bathymetric data

    Nathaniel G. Plant;K.Todd Holland;Jack A. Puleo

  • Beach Wizard: Nearshore bathymetry estimation through assimilation of model computations and remote observations

    Ap van Dongeren;Nathaniel Plant;Anna Cohen;Dano Roelvink

  • Blind testing of shoreline evolution models

    Jennifer Montaño;Giovanni Coco;Jose A. A. Antolínez;Tomas Beuzen

  • Evaluation of wave runup predictions from numerical and parametric models

    Hilary F. Stockdon;David M. Thompson;Nathaniel G. Plant;Joseph W. Long

  • A review of machine learning applications to coastal sediment transport and morphodynamics

    Evan B Goldstein;Giovanni Coco;Nathaniel G. Plant

  • Modelling of coastal evolution on yearly to decadal time scales

    Hans Hanson;S Aarninkhof;M Capobianco;JA Jimenez

  • Extended Kalman Filter framework for forecasting shoreline evolution

    Joseph W. Long;Nathaniel G. Plant

  • Predicting coastal cliff erosion using a Bayesian probabilistic model

    Cheryl J. Hapke;Nathaniel G. Plant

  • The Performance of Shoreline Detection Models Applied to Video Imagery

    Nathaniel G. Plant;Stefan G. J. Aarninkhof;Ian L. Turner;Kenneth S. Kingston

  • Evaluation of Dynamic Coastal Response to Sea-level Rise Modifies Inundation Likelihood

    Erika E. Lentz;E. Robert Thieler;Nathaniel G. Plant;Sawyer R. Stippa

  • Probabilistic prediction of barrier-island response to hurricanes

    Nathaniel G. Plant;Hilary F. Stockdon

  • Fluid acceleration effects on suspended sediment transport in the swash zone

    J. A. Puleo;K. T. Holland;N. G. Plant;D. N. Slinn

  • Numerical simulation of a low-lying barrier island's morphological response to Hurricane Katrina

    C.A. Lindemer;N.G. Plant;Jack A. Puleo;D.M. Thompson

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert A. Holman
Robert A. Holman Oregon State University
E. Robert Thieler
E. Robert Thieler United States Geological Survey
Jack A. Puleo
Jack A. Puleo University of Delaware
Giovanni Coco
Giovanni Coco University of Auckland
Suzanne J.M.H. Hulscher
Suzanne J.M.H. Hulscher University of Twente
Karin R. Bryan
Karin R. Bryan University of Auckland
Asbury H. Sallenger
Asbury H. Sallenger United States Geological Survey
José A. Jiménez
José A. Jiménez Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Ian L. Turner
Ian L. Turner University of New South Wales
Dano (J. A.) Roelvink
Dano (J. A.) Roelvink IHE Delft Institute for Water Education

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields and career pathways. Many students and professionals seek flexible learning options like online degrees, which can cater to diverse schedules and goals. For those interested in creative outlets connected to Earth Science, the best military friendly online photography degrees offer a way to capture and study our planet’s landscapes through visual storytelling.

Language skills are also valuable in environmental research and global collaboration. Programs such as short Spanish degrees online provide efficient ways to gain fluency, while specialized options like online Spanish degree programs for veterans expand access for those with military backgrounds.

In addition, creative disciplines like the arts can complement Earth Science careers by enhancing communication and design skills. Students may consider online MFA degree programs, which combine affordability and flexibility, enabling learners to develop valuable expertise applicable in environmental education, outreach, and advocacy.

Choosing the right online degree or career pathway involves balancing affordability, duration, and relevance to personal and professional goals. These interdisciplinary options provide avenues for growth beyond traditional Earth Science programs.

Best Scientists Citing Nathaniel G. Plant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles