World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
4529
World Ranking
11368
National Ranking
99

Jan Egger publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Egger sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 190 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jan Egger D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Egger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Egger is affiliated with the University of Graz in Austria and has a multidisciplinary research profile spanning medicine, computer science, and engineering. Their work predominantly intersects with radiology, biomedical engineering, computer vision, artificial intelligence, and surgery.

The research output includes numerous publications covering advanced topics such as radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, anatomy and medical technology, AI applications in cancer detection, and COVID-19 diagnosis using artificial intelligence. Other central themes include medical image segmentation techniques and the integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare and education.

Frequent coauthors in their research collaborations include Jens Kleesiek, Jianning Li, Christina Gsaxner, Antonio Pepe, and Behrus Puladi.

Jan Egger has contributed to several scholarly venues, with a strong presence in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Medical Image Analysis
  • Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Notable recent papers by or associated with Egger include:

  • Medical deep learning-A systematic meta-review, 2022, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
  • ChatGPT in healthcare: A taxonomy and systematic review, 2024, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
  • CellViT: Vision Transformers for precise cell segmentation and classification, 2024, Medical Image Analysis
  • A review on the applications of virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality in surgical simulation: an extension to different kinds of surgery, 2020, Expert Review of Medical Devices
  • ChatGPT in Healthcare: A Taxonomy and Systematic Review, 2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Jan Egger has published books through Springer Science+Business Media, including focused works in cranial implant design, aortic vessel tree segmentation, and medical image analysis. Titles include:

  • Towards the Automatization of Cranial Implant Design in Cranioplasty II (2021)
  • Towards the Automatization of Cranial Implant Design in Cranioplasty (2020)
  • Segmentation of the Aorta. Towards the Automatic Segmentation, Modeling, and Meshing of the Aortic Vessel Tree from Multicenter Acquisition (2024)
  • Medical Applications with Disentanglements (2023)
  • Shape in Medical Imaging (2023)

Best Publications

  • GBM Volumetry using the 3D Slicer Medical Image Computing Platform

    Jan Egger;Tina Kapur;Andriy Fedorov;Steve Pieper

  • Development of a surgical navigation system based on augmented reality using an optical see-through head-mounted display

    Xiaojun Chen;Lu Xu;Yiping Wang;Huixiang Wang

  • A review on the applications of virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality in surgical simulation: an extension to different kinds of surgery.

    Abel J Lungu;Wout Swinkels;Luc Claesen;Puxun Tu

  • Medical Deep Learning - A systematic Meta-Review.

    Jan Egger;Christina Gsaxner;Antonio Pepe;Jianning Li

  • HTC Vive MeVisLab integration via OpenVR for medical applications.

    Jan Egger;Markus Gall;Juergen Wallner;Pedro Boechat

  • Fiber Tractography Based on Diffusion Tensor Imaging Compared With High-Angular-Resolution Diffusion Imaging With Compressed Sensing: Initial Experience

    Daniela Kuhnt;Miriam H A Bauer;Jan Egger;Mirco Richter

  • Pituitary Adenoma Volumetry with 3D Slicer

    Jan Egger;Jan Egger;Tina Kapur;Christopher Nimsky;Ron Kikinis

  • Detection, segmentation, simulation and visualization of aortic dissections: A review.

    Antonio Pepe;Jianning Li;Malte Rolf-Pissarczyk;Christina Gsaxner

  • 3-T MR-guided brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies.

    Tina Kapur;Jan Egger;Antonio Damato;Ehud J. Schmidt

  • Robust Detection and Segmentation for Diagnosis of Vertebral Diseases Using Routine MR Images

    Dženan Zukić;Aleš Vlasák;Jan Egger;Daniel Hořínek

  • Square-Cut: A Segmentation Algorithm on the Basis of a Rectangle Shape

    Jan Egger;Jan Egger;Tina Kapur;Thomas Dukatz;Malgorzata Kolodziej

  • A Marker-Less Registration Approach for Mixed Reality–Aided Maxillofacial Surgery: a Pilot Evaluation

    Antonio Pepe;Gianpaolo Francesco Trotta;Peter Mohr-Ziak;Peter Mohr-Ziak;Christina Gsaxner

  • Nugget-cut: a segmentation scheme for spherically- and elliptically-shaped 3D objects

    Jan Egger;Miriam H. A. Bauer;Daniela Kuhnt;Barbara Carl

  • A review on computer-aided design and manufacturing of patient-specific maxillofacial implants.

    Afaque Rafique Memon;Enpeng Wang;Junlei Hu;Jan Egger

  • Integration of the OpenIGTLink Network Protocol for Image-Guided Therapy with the Medical Platform MeVisLab

    Jan Egger;Junichi Tokuda;Laurent Chauvin;Bernd Freisleben

  • Automatic skull defect restoration and cranial implant generation for cranioplasty.

    Jianning Li;Gord von Campe;Antonio Pepe;Christina Gsaxner

  • AVT: Multicenter aortic vessel tree CTA dataset collection with ground truth segmentation masks

    Unknown

  • Inside-Out Instrument Tracking for Surgical Navigation in Augmented Reality

    Christina Gsaxner;Jianning Li;Antonio Pepe;Dieter Schmalstieg

  • Computer-aided implant design for the restoration of cranial defects

    Xiaojun Chen;Lu Xu;Xing Li;Jan Egger

  • Clinical evaluation of semi-automatic open-source algorithmic software segmentation of the mandibular bone: Practical feasibility and assessment of a new course of action.

    Jürgen Wallner;Kerstin Hochegger;Xiaojun Chen;Irene Mischak

  • Cube-cut: vertebral body segmentation in MRI-data through cubic-shaped divergences.

    Robert Schwarzenberg;Bernd Freisleben;Christopher Nimsky;Jan Egger

  • Aorta Segmentation for Stent Simulation

    Jan Egger;Bernd Freisleben;Randolph Setser;Rahul Renapuraar

  • A Fast Vessel Centerline Extraction Algorithm for Catheter Simulation

    J. Egger;Z. Mostarkic;S. Grosskopf;B. Freisleben

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernd Freisleben
Bernd Freisleben Philipp University of Marburg
Dieter Schmalstieg
Dieter Schmalstieg University of Stuttgart
Christopher Nimsky
Christopher Nimsky Philipp University of Marburg
Tina Kapur
Tina Kapur Brigham and Women's Hospital
Andreas Kolb
Andreas Kolb University of Siegen
Thomas F. O'Donnell
Thomas F. O'Donnell Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Ron Kikinis
Ron Kikinis Brigham and Women's Hospital
Bernhard Kainz
Bernhard Kainz Imperial College London
Alexandra J. Golby
Alexandra J. Golby Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens pathways to a wide variety of online degrees and certifications. Many prospective students look for efficient ways to advance their education and gain valuable credentials without spending years in a classroom.

For those seeking a quick career boost, consider obtaining easy certifications that pay well. These programs focus on in-demand skills and can significantly improve your job prospects within months.

If you’re interested in moving quickly through an advanced degree, explore your options for the shortest online masters degree. Many universities now offer accelerated computer science master's programs fully online, helping you finish sooner and enter the workforce or shift your career in less time.

It’s also important to select from the most useful masters degrees in computer science and technology fields—programs that teach skills highly valued by employers.

Not ready for a full bachelor’s or master’s program? An online associate degree can provide foundational knowledge in programming, networking, or IT, and serve as a stepping stone for further education or entry-level jobs in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Egger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles