World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
44
Citations
6910
World Ranking
4198
National Ranking
712

Miriam Taegtmeyer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miriam Taegtmeyer sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Miriam Taegtmeyer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miriam Taegtmeyer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Miriam Taegtmeyer is affiliated with the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine in the United Kingdom. Their primary research falls within the broad field of Medicine, with a focus on Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Finance in relation to healthcare.

The scientist has contributed to several topics in health research including HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions, Global Maternal and Child Health, HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk, Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health, Healthcare Systems and Reforms, Chronic Disease Management Strategies, and COVID-19 epidemiological studies.

Frequent publication venues for Miriam Taegtmeyer's work include:

  • BMC Public Health
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • BMJ Global Health
  • BMJ Open

Miriam Taegtmeyer has been involved in numerous research publications. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Dolutegravir versus efavirenz in women starting HIV therapy in late pregnancy (DolPHIN-2): an open-label, randomised controlled trial," 2020, The Lancet HIV
  • "72 weeks post-partum follow-up of dolutegravir versus efavirenz initiated in late pregnancy (DolPHIN-2): an open-label, randomised controlled study," 2022, The Lancet HIV
  • "Using research networks to generate trustworthy qualitative public health research findings from multiple contexts," 2020, BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • "'I fear my partner will abandon me': the intersection of late initiation of antenatal care in pregnancy and poor ART adherence among women living with HIV in South Africa and Uganda," 2022, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
  • "Community-based HIV self-testing: a cluster-randomised trial of supply-side financial incentives and time-trend analysis of linkage to antiretroviral therapy in Zimbabwe," 2021, BMJ Global Health

The scientist collaborates frequently with multiple coauthors, including:

  • Yussif Alhassan
  • Cheryl Johnson
  • Karin Hatzold
  • Elizabeth L. Corbett
  • Rachel Tolhurst

Best Publications

  • Which intervention design factors influence performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review

    Maryse C Kok;Marjolein Dieleman;Miriam Taegtmeyer;Jacqueline E W Broerse

  • How does context influence performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? Evidence from the literature

    Maryse C Kok;Maryse C Kok;Sumit S Kane;Olivia Tulloch;Hermen Ormel

  • Performance of community health workers: situating their intermediary position within complex adaptive health systems.

    Maryse C. Kok;Jacqueline E. W. Broerse;Sally Theobald;Hermen Ormel

  • Limits and opportunities to community health worker empowerment: A multi-country comparative study.

    Sumit Kane;Maryse Kok;Hermen Ormel;Lilian Otiso

  • Optimising the benefits of community health workers' unique position between communities and the health sector: A comparative analysis of factors shaping relationships in four countries.

    Maryse C. Kok;Hermen Ormel;Jacqueline E. W. Broerse;Sumit Kane

  • 'I will choose when to test, where I want to test': investigating young people's preferences for HIV self-testing in Malawi and Zimbabwe.

    Pitchaya P. Indravudh;Euphemia L. Sibanda;Marc d’Elbée;Moses K. Kumwenda

  • Salaried and voluntary community health workers: exploring how incentives and expectation gaps influence motivation

    Hermen Ormel;Maryse Kok;Sumit Kane;Rukhsana Ahmed

  • Realizing the potential for HIV self-testing.

    C. Johnson;R. Baggaley;S. Forsythe;H. van Rooyen

  • A qualitative assessment of health extension workers’ relationships with the community and health sector in Ethiopia: opportunities for enhancing maternal health performance

    Maryse C. Kok;Maryse C. Kok;Aschenaki Z. Kea;Daniel G. Datiko;Jacqueline E.W. Broerse

  • How equitable are community health worker programmes and which programme features influence equity of community health worker services? A systematic review.

    Rosalind McCollum;Woedem Gomez;Sally Theobald;Miriam Taegtmeyer

  • Increasing access to HIV counseling and testing through mobile services in Kenya: strategies, utilization, and cost-effectiveness.

    Kristina L Grabbe;Nick Menzies;Miriam Taegtmeyer;Gideon Emukule

  • Dynamics and constraints of early infant diagnosis of HIV infection in rural Kenya

    Amin S. Hassan;Erick M. Sakwa;Helen M. Nabwera;Miriam M. Taegtmeyer

  • How do gender relations affect the working lives of close to community health service providers? Empirical research, a review and conceptual framework.

    Rosalind Steege;Miriam Taegtmeyer;Rosalind McCollum;Kate Hawkins

  • What Should the Ideal HIV Self-Test Look Like? A Usability Study of Test Prototypes in Unsupervised HIV Self-Testing in Kenya, Malawi, and South Africa

    Roger B. Peck;Jeanette M. Lim;Heidi van Rooyen;Wanjiru Mukoma

  • Supervision of community health workers in Mozambique: a qualitative study of factors influencing motivation and programme implementation

    Sozinho Daniel Ndima;Mohsin Sidat;Celso Give;Hermen Ormel

  • Does Supportive Supervision Enhance Community Health Worker Motivation? A Mixed-Methods Study in Four African Countries

    Maryse C Kok;Frédérique Vallières;Olivia Tulloch;Meghan Bruce Kumar

  • Dolutegravir versus efavirenz in women starting HIV therapy in late pregnancy (DolPHIN-2): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

    Kenneth Kintu;Thokozile R Malaba;Jesca Nakibuka;Christiana Papamichael

  • Indicators of sustainable capacity building for health research: analysis of four African case studies

    Imelda Bates;Miriam Taegtmeyer;S Bertel Squire;Daniel Ansong

  • HIV self-testing could "revolutionize testing in South Africa, but it has got to be done properly": perceptions of key stakeholders.

    Tawanda Makusha;Lucia Knight;Miriam Taegtmeyer;Olivia Tulloch

  • Strengthening referral systems in community health programs: a qualitative study in two rural districts of Maputo Province, Mozambique

    Celso Give;Sozinho Ndima;Rosalind Steege;Hermen Ormel

  • Scale-up of Voluntary HIV Counseling and Testing in Kenya

    Elizabeth Marum;Miriam Taegtmeyer;Kenneth Chebet

  • Susceptibility of healthcare workers in Kenya to hepatitis B: new strategies for facilitating vaccination uptake

    R. M. Suckling;Miriam Taegtmeyer;P. M. Nguku;S. S. Al-Abri

Frequent Co-Authors

Sally Theobald
Sally Theobald Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Elizabeth L. Corbett
Elizabeth L. Corbett London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Edwine Barasa
Edwine Barasa KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Katherine Fielding
Katherine Fielding University of London
Jacqueline E. W. Broerse
Jacqueline E. W. Broerse Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Philip Hyland
Philip Hyland National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Saye Khoo
Saye Khoo University of Liverpool
Frances M. Cowan
Frances M. Cowan Imperial College London
Eduard J. Sanders
Eduard J. Sanders University of Oxford
Penelope A. Phillips-Howard
Penelope A. Phillips-Howard Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring flexible options for studying Social Sciences and Humanities is easier than ever with a range of online degrees and fast-track programs. Many universities now offer a master degree online, ideal for those seeking to gain advanced knowledge and skills within a single year while balancing professional or personal commitments.

For students aiming to graduate faster, 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees provide an intensive curriculum that can help you enter the workforce sooner. These programs are great for motivated learners ready for a fast-paced academic environment.

Affordability is also a significant concern, especially for careers in social work. Check out the most affordable msw programs online to begin or advance your career in helping others, all without the financial strain often associated with graduate education.

Those interested in specialization within psychology or behavioral health should consider bcba online programs, which open doors to professional certification in applied behavior analysis and expanded career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Miriam Taegtmeyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles