World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
8216
World Ranking
5167
National Ranking
2309

Michael S. Lidow publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Lidow sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 81 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael S. Lidow D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Lidow sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael S. Lidow was affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore in the United States. Their academic career involved research and scholarship based at this institution.

Throughout their career, they did not have recent papers listed with details such as titles, years of publication, or venues, nor were there frequent co-authors or publication venues documented in the available data.

No specific fields or subfields of study were associated with their research portfolio in the data provided. Additionally, no particular topics of work or subject areas were identified within their scholarly contributions.

There were no records of book publications or awards associated with their name in the documented sources. The absence of these items means there is no available information on any monographs or honors received during their career.

Michael S. Lidow was noted as deceased, and all descriptions of their work and career are presented in the past tense. The available data does not include further details that could illuminate the scope or impact of their academic or scientific pursuits.

Best Publications

  • Distribution of dopaminergic receptors in the primate cerebral cortex: quantitative autoradiographic analysis using [3H]raclopride, [3H]spiperone and [3H]SCH23390.

    M.S. Lidow;P.S. Goldman-Rakic;D.W. Gallager;P. Rakic

  • Overlap of dopaminergic, adrenergic, and serotoninergic receptors and complementarity of their subtypes in primate prefrontal cortex

    PS Goldman-Rakic;Lidow;DW Gallager

  • Synchronized overproduction of neurotransmitter receptors in diverse regions of the primate cerebral cortex.

    Michael S. Lidow;Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic;Pasko Rakic

  • Dopamine D2 receptors in the cerebral cortex: distribution and pharmacological characterization with [3H]raclopride.

    Michael S. Lidow;Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic;Pasko Rakic;Robert B. Innis

  • The cerebral cortex: a case for a common site of action of antipsychotics

    Michael S. Lidow;Graham V. Williams;Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic

  • Characterization of basal and re-inflammation-associated long-term alteration in pain responsivity following short-lasting neonatal local inflamatory insult

    K. Ren;V. Anseloni;S. P. Zou;E. B. Wade

  • A common action of clozapine, haloperidol, and remoxipride on D1- and D2-dopaminergic receptors in the primate cerebral cortex

    Michael S. Lidow;Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic

  • Up-regulation of neuronal calcium sensor-1 (NCS-1) in the prefrontal cortex of schizophrenic and bipolar patients

    Phil Ok Koh;Ashiwel S. Undie;Nadine Kabbani;Robert Levenson

  • N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors are transiently expressed in the developing spinal cord ventral horn.

    Robert G. Kalb;Michael S. Lidow;Mark J. Halsted;Susan Hockfield

  • Dopamine receptor-interacting proteins: the Ca2+ connection in dopamine signaling

    Clare Bergson;Robert Levenson;Patricia S Goldman-Rakic;Michael S Lidow

  • The anatomy of dopamine in monkey and human prefrontal cortex.

    P. S. Goldman-Rakic;M. S. Lidow;J. F. Smiley;M. S. Williams

  • Scheduling of Monoaminergic Neurotransmitter Receptor Expression in the Primate Neocortex during Postnatal Development

    Michael S. Lidow;Pasko Rakic

  • Increased volume and glial density in primate prefrontal cortex associated with chronic antipsychotic drug exposure.

    Lynn D. Selemon;Michael S. Lidow;Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic

  • Down-regulation of the D1 and D5 dopamine receptors in the primate prefrontal cortex by chronic treatment with antipsychotic drugs

    Michael S. Lidow;John D. Elsworth;Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic

  • Maternal cocaine administration in mice alters DNA methylation and gene expression in hippocampal neurons of neonatal and prepubertal offspring

    Svetlana I. Novikova;Fang He;Jie Bai;Nicholas J. Cutrufello

  • Layer V neurons bear the majority of mRNAs encoding the five distinct dopamine receptor subtypes in the primate prefrontal cortex

    Michael S. Lidow;Michael S. Lidow;Feng Wang;Yang Cao;Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic

  • Primates exposed to cocaine in utero display reduced density and number of cerebral cortical neurons.

    Michael S. Lidow;Zan-Min Song

  • Identification of a long variant of mRNA encoding the NR3 subunit of the NMDA receptor: its regional distribution and developmental expression in the rat brain

    Lixin Sun;Frank L. Margolis;Michael T. Shipley;Michael S. Lidow;Michael S. Lidow

  • Long-term effects of neonatal pain on nociceptive systems

    Unknown

  • Consequences of paternal cocaine exposure in mice.

    Fang He;Irina A. Lidow;Michael S. Lidow

  • Prenatal cocaine exposure adversely affects development of the primate cerebral cortex

    Michael S. Lidow

Frequent Co-Authors

Pasko Rakic
Pasko Rakic Yale University
Robert Levenson
Robert Levenson Pennsylvania State University
Ke Ren
Ke Ren University of Maryland, Baltimore
Richard J. Traub
Richard J. Traub University of Maryland, Baltimore
Amy F.T. Arnsten
Amy F.T. Arnsten Yale University
Paul Greengard
Paul Greengard Rockefeller University
Robert G. Kalb
Robert G. Kalb Northwestern University
Stephen J. Suomi
Stephen J. Suomi National Institutes of Health
Daniel H. Geschwind
Daniel H. Geschwind University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, there are several related online degrees and career pathways to consider. Psychology is a common starting point. Many prospective students want to know how much is a psychology degree before enrolling, as tuition and program fees can vary significantly by school and program format.

Graduate-level options can further expand your expertise. Some people choose to pursue masters in social work online programs, which are attractive for those focused on clinical practice or mental health services. Others look into best online psyd programs if their career goals involve clinical psychology or assessment.

For those interested in counseling and therapy, there are also accelerated marriage and family therapy programs that offer shorter paths to professional licensure. Each of these fields integrates scientific understanding with direct work supporting clients—making them great complements to neuroscience or potential alternatives, depending on your interests.

Best Scientists Citing Michael S. Lidow

Recently Published Articles