World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
49
Citations
8454
World Ranking
4057
National Ranking
450

Michael J. O. Pocock publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. O. Pocock sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 96 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Michael J. O. Pocock D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. O. Pocock sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. O. Pocock is affiliated with the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a focus on subfields such as Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services

Michael J. O. Pocock has published papers in various scientific journals. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Is light pollution driving moth population declines? A review of causal mechanisms across the life cycle," 2020, Insect Conservation and Diversity
  • "Conceptualizing ecosystem services using social-ecological networks," 2021, Trends in Ecology & Evolution
  • "Street lighting has detrimental impacts on local insect populations," 2021, Science Advances
  • "Making Messy Data Work for Conservation," 2020, One Earth
  • "The benefits of citizen science and nature-noticing activities for well-being, nature connectedness and pro-nature conservation behaviours," 2023, People and Nature

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Michael J. O. Pocock include:

  • Tim Adriaens
  • Helen E. Roy
  • David A. Bohan
  • Miranda Bane
  • Maarten de Groot

Their research has also appeared repeatedly in key publication venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Insect Conservation and Diversity
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution
  • One Earth
  • People and Nature

Best Publications

  • The robustness and restoration of a network of ecological networks.

    Michael J. O. Pocock;Darren M. Evans;Jane Memmott

  • A global synthesis of the effects of diversified farming systems on arthropod diversity within fields and across agricultural landscapes.

    Elinor M. Lichtenberg;Elinor M. Lichtenberg;Christina M. Kennedy;Claire Kremen;Péter Batáry

  • Bias and information in biological records

    Nick J. B. Isaac;Michael J. O. Pocock

  • The diversity and evolution of ecological and environmental citizen science.

    Michael J. O. Pocock;John C. Tweddle;Joanna Savage;Lucy D. Robinson

  • Horizon scanning for invasive alien species with the potential to threaten biodiversity in Great Britain

    Helen E. Roy;Jodey M. Peyton;David C. Aldridge;Tristan Bantock

  • Pollination by nocturnal Lepidoptera, and the effects of light pollution: a review

    Callum J. Macgregor;Callum J. Macgregor;Michael J. O. Pocock;Richard Fox;Darren M. Evans

  • Ploidy influences rarity and invasiveness in plants

    Maharaj K. Pandit;Michael J. O. Pocock;William E. Kunin

  • Understanding citizen science and environmental monitoring: final report on behalf of UK Environmental Observation Framework

    H.E. Roy;M.J.O. Pocock;C.D. Preston;D.B. Roy

  • A Vision for Global Biodiversity Monitoring With Citizen Science

    Michael J.O. Pocock;Mark Chandler;Rick Bonney;Ian Thornhill;Ian Thornhill

  • The Biological Records Centre: a pioneer of citizen science

    Michael J. O. Pocock;Helen E. Roy;Chris D. Preston;David B. Roy

  • Dispersal in house mice

    Michael J. O. Pocock;Heidi C. Hauffe;Jeremy B. Searle

  • The dark side of street lighting: impacts on moths and evidence for the disruption of nocturnal pollen transport.

    Callum J. Macgregor;Darren M. Evans;Darren M. Evans;Richard Fox;Michael J. O. Pocock

  • Merging DNA metabarcoding and ecological network analysis to understand and build resilient terrestrial ecosystems

    Darren M. Evans;Darren M. Evans;James J. N. Kitson;David H. Lunt;Nigel A. Straw

  • The robustness of a network of ecological networks to habitat loss

    Darren M. Evans;Michael J. O. Pocock;Jane Memmott

  • The contrasting effects of genome size, chromosome number and ploidy level on plant invasiveness: a global analysis

    Maharaj K. Pandit;Steven M. White;Michael J. O. Pocock

  • Is light pollution driving moth population declines? A review of causal mechanisms across the life cycle

    Douglas H. Boyes;Douglas H. Boyes;Darren M. Evans;Richard Fox;Mark S. Parsons

  • Adaptations of animals to commensal habitats: population dynamics of house mice Mus musculus domesticus on farms

    Michael J. O. Pocock;Jeremy B. Searle;Piran C. L. White

  • Developing the global potential of citizen science: Assessing opportunities that benefit people, society and the environment in East Africa

    Michael J. O. Pocock;Helen E. Roy;Tom August;Anthony Kuria

  • Conceptualizing ecosystem services using social-ecological networks.

    Unknown

  • FORUM Ecological networks: the missing links in biomonitoring science

    Clare Gray;Clare Gray;Donald J. Baird;Simone Baumgartner;Ute Jacob

  • Measures of immune function of wild mice, Mus musculus

    Stephen R. Abolins;Michael J. O. Pocock;Julius C. R. Hafalla;Eleanor M. Riley

  • Testing biotic indicator taxa: the sensitivity of insectivorous mammals and their prey to the intensification of lowland agriculture

    Michael J. O. Pocock;Nancy Jennings

Frequent Co-Authors

Helen E. Roy
Helen E. Roy Anglia Ruskin University
Darren M. Evans
Darren M. Evans Newcastle University
David A. Bohan
David A. Bohan INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Richard Fox
Richard Fox Butterfly Conservation
Guy Woodward
Guy Woodward Imperial College London
Piran C. L. White
Piran C. L. White University of York
Jane Memmott
Jane Memmott University of Bristol
David B. Roy
David B. Roy UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Jeremy B. Searle
Jeremy B. Searle Cornell University
William J. Sutherland
William J. Sutherland University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Ecology and Evolution can intersect with many health and science fields. For students interested in shifting to healthcare, there are accelerated nursing programs for non nurses online that allow individuals with a non-nursing background to transition quickly into nursing careers. These flexible programs are ideal for those who want to apply scientific principles to real-world challenges in healthcare.

Advancing in nursing offers a variety of options, including fast-track pathways like rn to bsn 6 months programs, helping registered nurses earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing in less time. For those aiming to specialize, it’s important to consider how long does it take to be a nurse practitioner, as advanced roles in nursing can be reached online in as little as two years, depending on prior education.

As you explore your options, don’t forget to research earning potential—pmhnp salary trends show competitive compensation for specialized nurse practitioners. By understanding these pathways, you can make informed decisions about combining science education with diverse, rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. O. Pocock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles