World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Melanie N. Zeilinger

Melanie N. Zeilinger

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 38 2244 2090 26 25 232 6480

Melanie N. Zeilinger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Melanie N. Zeilinger between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Melanie N. Zeilinger published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 15.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 55 publications in 2023. 38 of the 301 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 55. Peak 55 publications in 2023. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 32 publications 2023: 55 publications 2024: 41 publications 2025: 37 publications 2026: 1 publication
2007 2026

301 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Melanie N. Zeilinger: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 3
2009 1
2010 1
2011 4
2012 6
2013 4
2014 8
2015 4
2016 7
2017 11
2018 15
2019 15
2020 26
2021 29
2022 32
2023 55
2024 41
2025 37
2026 1
Total 301
Download as CSV

Melanie N. Zeilinger publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melanie N. Zeilinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 227–236 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 232 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99 232
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Melanie N. Zeilinger D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melanie N. Zeilinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130 38
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Learning-Based Model Predictive Control: Toward Safe Learning in Control

    Unknown

  • Cautious Model Predictive Control Using Gaussian Process Regression

    Unknown

  • Efficient interior point methods for multistage problems arising in receding horizon control

    Alexander Domahidi;Aldo U. Zgraggen;Melanie N. Zeilinger;Manfred Morari

  • Learning-Based Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Racing

    Unknown

  • Real-time suboptimal model predictive control using a combination of explicit MPC and online optimization

    M. N. Zeilinger;C. N. Jones;M. Morari

  • Reachability-based safe learning with Gaussian processes

    Anayo K. Akametalu;Shahab Kaynama;Jaime F. Fisac;Melanie N. Zeilinger

  • Data-Driven Model Predictive Control for Trajectory Tracking With a Robotic Arm

    Andrea Carron;Elena Arcari;Martin Wermelinger;Lukas Hewing

  • Distributed synthesis and stability of cooperative distributed model predictive control for linear systems

    Christian Conte;Colin N. Jones;Manfred Morari;Melanie N. Zeilinger

  • On real-time robust model predictive control

    Melanie N. Zeilinger;Davide M. Raimondo;Alexander Domahidi;Manfred Morari

  • Soft Constrained Model Predictive Control With Robust Stability Guarantees

    Melanie N. Zeilinger;Manfred Morari;Colin N. Jones

  • Cautious NMPC with Gaussian Process Dynamics for Autonomous Miniature Race Cars

    Unknown

  • Interaction-Aware Motion Prediction for Autonomous Driving: A Multiple Model Kalman Filtering Scheme

    Unknown

  • Probabilistic model predictive safety certification for learning-based control

    Unknown

  • Gaussian Process-Based Predictive Control for Periodic Error Correction

    Edgar D. Klenske;Melanie N. Zeilinger;Bernhard Scholkopf;Philipp Hennig

  • MPC for Tracking Periodic References

    Daniel Limon;Mario Pereira;David Munoz de la Pena;Teodoro Alamo

  • Stochastic Model Predictive Control for Linear Systems Using Probabilistic Reachable Sets

    Unknown

  • Computational aspects of distributed optimization in model predictive control

    Christian Conte;Tyler Summers;Melanie N. Zeilinger;Manfred Morari

  • Quantization Design for Distributed Optimization

    Ye Pu;Melanie N. Zeilinger;Colin N. Jones

  • Distributed synthesis and control of constrained linear systems

    Christian Conte;Niklaus R. Voellmy;Melanie N. Zeilinger;Manfred Morari

Frequent Co-Authors

Colin N. Jones
Colin N. Jones École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Manfred Morari
Manfred Morari University of Pennsylvania
Claire J. Tomlin
Claire J. Tomlin University of California, Berkeley
Matthias Guckenberger
Matthias Guckenberger University of Zurich
Bernhard Schölkopf
Bernhard Schölkopf Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
Philipp Hennig
Philipp Hennig University of Tübingen
Scott J. Moura
Scott J. Moura University of California, Berkeley
Teodoro Alamo
Teodoro Alamo University of Seville
Roger Gassert
Roger Gassert ETH Zurich
Kristina Shea
Kristina Shea ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities for students interested in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. For instance, understanding the speech pathology degree cost online highlights how cost-effective online programs can be, making advanced education more accessible.

Veterans seeking to transition into new fields can benefit from tailored programs like the online speech pathology bachelor degree for veterans, which offers flexible learning options and support services designed for military backgrounds.

Accelerated learning options, such as 5-year speech pathology programs, exemplify how engineering students can fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner without compromising on quality.

Additionally, understanding diverse career paths, including how to become an expert in niche roles like an FBI profiler, showcases the wide-ranging applications of analytical and technical skills honed in engineering disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Melanie N. Zeilinger

Recently Published Articles