World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew J. Slaughter

Matthew J. Slaughter

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
53
Citations
16588
World Ranking
1167
National Ranking
705

Matthew J. Slaughter publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Slaughter sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 113 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Matthew J. Slaughter D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Slaughter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew J. Slaughter is affiliated with Dartmouth College in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broad domain of Social Sciences, with a focus on several subfields including Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's work spans numerous topics related to electoral systems, social policy, urban and neighborhood studies, vaccine coverage, and pediatric healthcare ethics. These topics include:

  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Child and Adolescent Health

Recent publications demonstrate a diverse range of interests and collaborative work. The following are notable papers authored or co-authored by Matthew J. Slaughter:

  • "City limits to partisan polarization in the American public," 2021, Political Science Research and Methods
  • "Adolescents Who Have Undergone Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Are More Likely to Get a COVID-19 Vaccine," 2023, Journal of Adolescent Health
  • "Data - Is Power," 2021, Russia in Global Affairs
  • "Finding uncoded anaphylaxis in electronic health records to estimate the sensitivity of International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes," 2024, American Journal of Epidemiology
  • "Replication Data for: City Limits to Partisan Polarization in the American Public," 2020, Harvard Dataverse

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Kenneth F. Scheve
  • Amalie Jensen
  • William Marble
  • Gloria D. Coronado
  • Amanda F. Petrik

Common publication venues for their research include:

  • Political Science Research and Methods
  • Journal of Adolescent Health
  • Russia in Global Affairs
  • American Journal of Epidemiology
  • Harvard Dataverse

Best Publications

  • Labor-Market Competition and Individual Preferences Over Immigration Policy

    Kenneth F. Scheve;Matthew J. Slaughter

  • Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms

    Jonathan E. Haskel;Sonia C. Pereira;Matthew J. Slaughter

  • What determines individual trade-policy preferences?

    Kenneth F. Scheve;Matthew J. Slaughter

  • International Trade and American Wages in the 1980s: Giant Sucking Sound or Small Hiccup?

    Robert Z. Lawrence;Matthew J. Slaughter;Robert E. Hall;Steven J. Davis

  • Vertical Production Networks in Multinational Firms

    Gordon H. Hanson;Raymond J. Mataloni;Matthew J. Slaughter

  • Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production

    Kenneth Scheve;Matthew J. Slaughter

  • Global Engagement and the Innovation Activities of Firms

    Chiara Criscuolo;Jonathan E. Haskel;Matthew J. Slaughter

  • Globalization and the Perceptions of American Workers

    Kenneth F. Scheve;Matthew J. Slaughter

  • Public Finance and Individual Preferences over Globalization Strategies

    Gordon H. Hanson;Kenneth Scheve;Matthew J. Slaughter

  • The Squam Lake Report: Fixing the Financial System

    Kenneth R. French;Martin N. Baily;John Campbell;John H. Cochrane

  • International Trade and Labor-Demand Elasticities

    Matthew J. Slaughter

  • Production transfer within multinational enterprises and American wages

    Matthew J Slaughter;Matthew J Slaughter

  • Trade, Technology and UK Wage Inequality

    Jonathan Haskel;Matthew J. Slaughter

  • Wages and International Rent Sharing in Multinational Firms

    John W. Budd;Jozef Konings;Matthew J. Slaughter

  • Trade liberalization and per capita income convergence: a difference-in-differences analysis

    Matthew J. Slaughter

  • Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms

    Jonathan E. Haskel;Jonathan E. Haskel;Jonathan E. Haskel;Sonia C. Pereira;Matthew J. Slaughter;Matthew J. Slaughter

  • LABOR-MARKET ADJUSTMENT IN OPEN ECONOMIES: EVIDENCE FROM US STATES

    Gordon H Hanson;Matthew J Slaughter

  • Productivity growth, knowledge flows and spillovers

    Gustavo Crespi;Chiara Criscuolo;Jonathan Haskel;Matthew Slaughter

  • The Effect of Globalization on Wages in the Advanced Economies

    Matthew J. Slaughter;Phillip Swagel;Graham Hacche;Flemming Larsen

  • Does the Sector Bias of Skill-Biased Technical Change Explain Changing Skill Premia? *

    Jonathan E. Haskel;Jonathan E. Haskel;Matthew J. Slaughter

  • Labor-Market Competition and Individual Preferences Over Immigration Policy

    Kenneth Scheve;Matthew J. Slaughter;Matthew J. Slaughter

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Haskel
Jonathan Haskel Imperial College London
Gail Hanson
Gail Hanson University of California, Riverside
Kenneth Scheve
Kenneth Scheve University of Notre Dame
Robert J. Shiller
Robert J. Shiller Yale University
John H. Cochrane
John H. Cochrane Hoover Institution
Anil K. Kashyap
Anil K. Kashyap University of Chicago
David S. Scharfstein
David S. Scharfstein Harvard University
Frederic S. Mishkin
Frederic S. Mishkin Columbia University
Kenneth R. French
Kenneth R. French Dartmouth College
Douglas W. Diamond
Douglas W. Diamond University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Economics and Finance can lead to a variety of rewarding online degree and certification options. For students aiming to fast-track their careers, pursuing accelerated finance degree programs offers a rapid path to acquiring specialized knowledge and skills in financial analysis, investment, and banking.

Those interested in management or leadership roles may consider enrolling in mba fast track programs. These online MBAs allow graduates to complete their studies at an accelerated pace, preparing them for senior positions in finance and economics sectors.

If bookkeeping or entry-level accounting roles appeal to you, obtaining credentials as a certified bookkeeper can be a smart starting point. Certificate programs focus on practical accounting principles and open doors in a range of business settings.

Additionally, degrees in business administration—such as office degrees—can help students build administrative and organizational expertise valued in modern offices. Each of these flexible online study paths supports diverse career goals in today’s dynamic financial environment.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew J. Slaughter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles