World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
15580
World Ranking
10138
National Ranking
4432

Martin Dym publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Dym sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 148 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Martin Dym D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Dym sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Dym is affiliated with Georgetown University Medical Center in the United States. Their academic profile indicates a focus on medical and scientific research within this institution.

Although specific publications, co-authors, and research topics are not listed, the affiliation with a medical center suggests involvement in clinical or biomedical research activities. The absence of detailed information on fields of study, subfields, or main topics restricts a more precise description of their research scope.

No records of recent papers, frequent publication venues, or book publications are available, which limits insight into their academic output and collaborative networks. Similarly, there are no documented awards or honors associated with Martin Dym.

Given the limited available data, the profile focuses mainly on the professional connection with Georgetown University Medical Center, a notable institution for medical research and clinical practice.

Best Publications

  • The Blood-Testis Barrier in the Rat and the Physiological Compartmentation of the Seminiferous Epithelium

    Martin Dym;Don W. Fawcett

  • Extracellular matrix regulates Sertoli cell differentiation, testicular cord formation, and germ cell development in vitro.

    M A Hadley;S W Byers;C A Suárez-Quian;H K Kleinman

  • Cellular Source and Mechanisms of High Transcriptome Complexity in the Mammalian Testis

    Magali Soumillon;Magali Soumillon;Anamaria Necsulea;Anamaria Necsulea;Manuela Weier;David Brawand;David Brawand

  • Further Observations on the Numbers of Spermatogonia, Spermatocytes, and Spermatids Connected by Intercellular Bridges in the Mammalian Testis

    Martin Dym;Don W. Fawcett

  • The normal development of the blood‐testis barrier and the effects of clomiphene and estrogen treatment

    Roberto Vitale;Don W. Fawcett;Martin Dym

  • An improved perfusion fixation method for the testis

    W. G. Forssmann;S. Ito;E. Weihe;A. Aoki

  • Isolation, Characterization, and Culture of Human Spermatogonia

    Zuping He;Maria Kokkinaki;Jiji Jiang;Ina Dobrinski

  • Isolation of male germ-line stem cells; influence of GDNF.

    Marie Claude Hofmann;Laura Braydich-Stolle;Martin Dym

  • Generation and in vitro differentiation of a spermatogonial cell line.

    Li Xin Feng;Yali Chen;Luis Dettin;Renee A. Reijo Pera

  • Stem cell factor/c-kit up-regulates cyclin D3 and promotes cell cycle progression via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/p70 S6 kinase pathway in spermatogonia.

    Li-Xin Feng;Neelakanta Ravindranath;Martin Dym

  • Expression of c-kit receptor and its autophosphorylation in immature rat type A spermatogonia.

    M. Dym;Meng-Chun Jia;G. Dirami;J. M. Price

  • Gdnf upregulates c-Fos transcription via the Ras/Erk1/2 pathway to promote mouse spermatogonial stem cell proliferation.

    Zuping He;Jiji Jiang;Maria Kokkinaki;Nady Golestaneh

  • Basement Membrane Regulation of Sertoli Cells

    Martin Dym

  • Spermatogonial stem cells of the testis.

    Martin Dym

  • Pluripotent stem cells derived from adult human testes

    Nady Golestaneh;Maria Kokkinaki;Disha Pant;Jiji Jiang

  • Gfra1 Silencing in Mouse Spermatogonial Stem Cells Results in Their Differentiation Via the Inactivation of RET Tyrosine Kinase

    Zuping He;Jiji Jiang;Marie Claude Hofmann;Martin Dym

  • Regulation of rat testis gonocyte proliferation by platelet-derived growth factor and estradiol: identification of signaling mechanisms involved.

    Hua Li;Vassilios Papadopoulos;Branislav Vidic;Martin Dym

  • Spermatogonial stem cells: mouse and human comparisons.

    Martin Dym;Maria Kokkinaki;Zuping He

  • Intraepithelial lymphocytes in the male reproductive tract of rats and rhesus monkeys.

    Martin Dym;Lynn J. Romrell

  • Effects of Stem Cell Factor and Granulocyte Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor on Survival of Porcine Type A Spermatogonia Cultured in KSOM

    Ghenima Dirami;Neelakanta Ravindranath;Vernon Pursel;Martin Dym

Frequent Co-Authors

Wai-Yee Chan
Wai-Yee Chan Chinese University of Hong Kong
Vassilios Papadopoulos
Vassilios Papadopoulos University of Southern California
Hynda K. Kleinman
Hynda K. Kleinman George Washington University
Ina Dobrinski
Ina Dobrinski University of Calgary
Warren E. Johnson
Warren E. Johnson Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute
Henrik Kaessmann
Henrik Kaessmann Heidelberg University
Michael D. Griswold
Michael D. Griswold Washington State University
Tarjei S. Mikkelsen
Tarjei S. Mikkelsen Arsenal Biosciences (United States)
William F. Crowley
William F. Crowley Harvard University
Peter J. Munson
Peter J. Munson Center for Information Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Biology and Biochemistry, there are several flexible online degree options that open doors to diverse career paths in healthcare, nutrition, and management. For example, if you are interested in the science of food and wellness, a nutritionist degree online can help launch your career as a registered dietitian or health coach.

Those seeking roles in healthcare leadership can consider the growing number of cahme accredited mha programs available online. These programs offer advanced skills in healthcare management, policy, and operations.

For nurses looking to advance without additional clinical requirements, there are also reputable online dnp programs without clinicals. These degrees are designed for working professionals and focus on leadership, research, and healthcare systems improvement.

If your interests lean toward high-level research or academic administration, earning a phd in healthcare management online could be the right path. This qualification opens opportunities in policy development, research, and top executive roles within the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Dym

Recently Published Articles