World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 34 2993 2715 1648 1450 66 11583

Mark M. Pitt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark M. Pitt between 1980 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark M. Pitt published across 42 years, from 1980 to 2021, averaging 1.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 1999. 1 of the 68 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 1999. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 5 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1980 2021

68 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark M. Pitt: publications per year, 1980 to 2021
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 2
1982 0
1983 2
1984 3
1985 3
1986 1
1987 2
1988 1
1989 4
1990 2
1991 2
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 4
1999 5
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 5
2004 0
2005 3
2006 1
2007 1
2008 0
2009 0
2010 4
2011 2
2012 3
2013 0
2014 3
2015 1
2016 1
2017 2
2018 0
2019 2
2020 0
2021 1
Total 68
Download as CSV

Mark M. Pitt publications per year - data summary

  • Mark M. Pitt, a Economics and Finance scholar from Brown University, has 68 publications recorded across 42 years, from 1980 to 2021.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1980 and the most recent to 2021.
  • The most productive years are 1999 and 2003, with 5 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1980, 1986, 1988, 1993 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 10 of the 42 years in the span carry no publications at all (1982, 1992, 1994, 2000 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 1.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 2.1 per year counting only the 32 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2017-2021) hold 5 publications, 7% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1980-1993: 24 publications (1.7 per year); 1994-2007: 25 publications (1.8 per year); 2008-2021: 19 publications (1.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Mark M. Pitt publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark M. Pitt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 62–66 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 66 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32 66
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Mark M. Pitt publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 42–46 to 521+ publications.
  • Mark M. Pitt, a Economics and Finance scholar from Brown University, records 66 publications - the 2nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 2% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Mark M. Pitt, and about 98% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 167–171 publications range, and Mark M. Pitt ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 137–141 publications, holding 111 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 48% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 521 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Mark M. Pitt D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark M. Pitt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171 34
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark M. Pitt D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 72 ranges running from 30 to 101+ D-Index.
  • Mark M. Pitt, a Economics and Finance scholar from Brown University, records 34 D-Index - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Mark M. Pitt, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44 D-Index range, and Mark M. Pitt ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 33 D-Index, holding 178 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Mark M. Pitt is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their research intersects several fields, including economics, environmental chemistry, and nutrition. The scholar's work reflects a focus on the relationships between environmental factors and economic as well as health outcomes.

Their recent publications demonstrate a concentrated investigation into the impacts of arsenic contamination in water sources and its wider effects. Two of their papers published in 2020 address the costs associated with a public health success, specifically examining arsenic well water contamination and productivity in Bangladesh. One paper appeared in The Review of Economic Studies and the other in Zenodo, the CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research's repository.

Mark M. Pitt's collaborative efforts include frequent co-authorship with researchers such as Mark R. Rosenzweig and Mohammad Nazmul Hassan, each contributing to multiple joint publications. These collaborations enhance the interdisciplinary nature of the work.

Their publications have appeared in specialized venues reflecting the integration of economics with public health and environmental sciences, notably:

  • The Review of Economic Studies
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Their research primarily encompasses several broad topics including:

  • Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access

Their subfields of study further clarify their interdisciplinary approach:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Mark M. Pitt's work contributes to understanding environmental impacts on economic productivity and health, emphasizing the importance of addressing water contamination issues in developing contexts. Their research sits at the nexus of environmental science and economic policy, with a specialized focus on arsenic contamination and its socioeconomic consequences.

Best Publications

  • The Impact of Group-Based Credit Programs on Poor Households in Bangladesh: Does the Gender of Participants Matter?

    Mark M. Pitt;Shahidur R. Khandker

  • THE MEASUREMENT AND SOURCES OF TECHNICAL INEFFICIENCY IN THE INDONESIAN WEAVING INDUSTRY

    Mark M Pitt;Lung-Fei Lee

  • Empowering Women with Micro Finance: Evidence from Bangladesh

    Mark M. Pitt;Shahidur R. Khandker;Jennifer Cartwright

  • Productivity, health and inequality in the intrahousehold distribution of food in low-income countries

    Mark M Pitt;Mark R Rosenzweig;Nazmul Hassan

  • Credit programs for the poor and the health status of children in rural bangladesh

    Mark M. Pitt;Shahidur R. Khandker;Omar Haider Chowdhury;Daniel L. Millimet

  • The determinants and consequences of the placement of government programs in Indonesia

    Mark M. Pitt;Mark R. Rosenzweig;Donna M. Gibbons

  • Household and intrahousehold impact of the Grameen Bank and similar targeted credit programs in Bangladesh

    Unknown

  • Microeconometric Demand Systems with Binding Non-Negativity Constraints: The Dual Approach

    Lung-Fei Lee;Mark M. Pitt

  • Food Preferences and Nutrition in Rural Bangladesh

    Mark M. Pitt

  • Human Capital Investment and the Gender Division of Labor in a Brawn-Based Economy

    Mark M. Pitt;Mark R. Rosenzweig;Mohammad Nazmul Hassan

  • Health and Nutrient Consumption Across and Within Farm Households

    Mark M. Pitt;Mark R. Rosenzweig

  • The effects of improved nutrition, sanitation, and water quality on child health in high-mortality populations

    Lung-fei Lee;Mark R. Rosenzweig;Mark M. Pitt

  • Estimating the Intrahousehold Incidence of Illness: Child Health and Gender-Inequality in the Allocation of Time

    Mark M. Pitt;Mark R. Rosenzweig

  • Credit programs for the poor and reproductive behavior in low-income countries: are the reported causal relationships the result of heterogeneity bias?

    Mark M. Pin;Shahidur R. Khandker;Signe-Mary Mckernan;M. Abdul Latif

  • Does Micro-Credit Empower Women? Evidence from Bangladesh

    Unknown

  • Smuggling and price disparity

    Mark M. Pitt

  • Subsidy to Promote Girls' Secondary Education: The Female Stipend Program in Bangladesh

    Shahidur Khandker;Mark Pitt;Nobuhiko Fuwa

  • Credit Programmes for the Poor and Seasonality in Rural Bangladesh

    M.M. Pitt;S.R. Khandker

  • Does micro-credit empower women: evidence from Bangladesh

    Mark M. Pitt;Shahidur R. Khandker;Jennifer Cartwright

  • Equity, externalities and energy subsidies The case of kerosine in Indonesia☆

    Mark M. Pitt

  • MICROECONOMETRIC MODELS OF RATIONING, IMPERFECT MARKETS, AND NON-NEGATIVITY CONSTRAINTS

    Lung-Fei Lee;Mark M. Pitt

  • Credit Programs for the Poor and the Health Status of Children in Rural Bangladesh

    Omar Haider Chowdhury;Shahidur R. Khandker;Daniel L. Millimet;Daniel L. Millimet;Mark M. Pitt

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark R. Rosenzweig
Mark R. Rosenzweig Yale University
Lung-fei Lee
Lung-fei Lee The Ohio State University
Daniel L. Millimet
Daniel L. Millimet Southern Methodist University
Joel Slemrod
Joel Slemrod University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Bhaskar Dutta
Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University
Andrew D. Hamilton
Andrew D. Hamilton New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Economics and Finance in the USA can open doors to many related disciplines and career opportunities, especially if you explore online degree options. Careers in business, management, and communication are closely linked and highly valued in finance-driven industries.

If you’re interested in the business side of hospitality, a hospitality degree online offers specialized training in hotel, tourism, and event management with a strong foundation in business and customer relations. For those aiming for leadership positions, pursuing the cheapest aacsb accredited online mba can give you a competitive edge and international recognition.

Human resources plays a key role in organizational success. Explore the top schools for master's in human resources online to develop expertise in managing people and workplace culture. Communication skills are also crucial in the finance sector, especially in roles involving public relations or investor relations. Consider an online masters in communications to enhance your professional profile and career versatility.

Best Scientists Citing Mark M. Pitt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles