World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
34
Citations
11583
World Ranking
2993
National Ranking
1648

Mark M. Pitt publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark M. Pitt sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 66 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Mark M. Pitt D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark M. Pitt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark M. Pitt is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their research intersects several fields, including economics, environmental chemistry, and nutrition. The scholar's work reflects a focus on the relationships between environmental factors and economic as well as health outcomes.

Their recent publications demonstrate a concentrated investigation into the impacts of arsenic contamination in water sources and its wider effects. Two of their papers published in 2020 address the costs associated with a public health success, specifically examining arsenic well water contamination and productivity in Bangladesh. One paper appeared in The Review of Economic Studies and the other in Zenodo, the CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research's repository.

Mark M. Pitt's collaborative efforts include frequent co-authorship with researchers such as Mark R. Rosenzweig and Mohammad Nazmul Hassan, each contributing to multiple joint publications. These collaborations enhance the interdisciplinary nature of the work.

Their publications have appeared in specialized venues reflecting the integration of economics with public health and environmental sciences, notably:

  • The Review of Economic Studies
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Their research primarily encompasses several broad topics including:

  • Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access

Their subfields of study further clarify their interdisciplinary approach:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Mark M. Pitt's work contributes to understanding environmental impacts on economic productivity and health, emphasizing the importance of addressing water contamination issues in developing contexts. Their research sits at the nexus of environmental science and economic policy, with a specialized focus on arsenic contamination and its socioeconomic consequences.

Best Publications

  • The Impact of Group-Based Credit Programs on Poor Households in Bangladesh: Does the Gender of Participants Matter?

    Mark M. Pitt;Shahidur R. Khandker

  • THE MEASUREMENT AND SOURCES OF TECHNICAL INEFFICIENCY IN THE INDONESIAN WEAVING INDUSTRY

    Mark M Pitt;Lung-Fei Lee

  • Empowering Women with Micro Finance: Evidence from Bangladesh

    Mark M. Pitt;Shahidur R. Khandker;Jennifer Cartwright

  • Productivity, health and inequality in the intrahousehold distribution of food in low-income countries

    Mark M Pitt;Mark R Rosenzweig;Nazmul Hassan

  • Credit programs for the poor and the health status of children in rural bangladesh

    Mark M. Pitt;Shahidur R. Khandker;Omar Haider Chowdhury;Daniel L. Millimet

  • The determinants and consequences of the placement of government programs in Indonesia

    Mark M. Pitt;Mark R. Rosenzweig;Donna M. Gibbons

  • Household and intrahousehold impact of the Grameen Bank and similar targeted credit programs in Bangladesh

    Unknown

  • Microeconometric Demand Systems with Binding Non-Negativity Constraints: The Dual Approach

    Lung-Fei Lee;Mark M. Pitt

  • Food Preferences and Nutrition in Rural Bangladesh

    Mark M. Pitt

  • Human Capital Investment and the Gender Division of Labor in a Brawn-Based Economy

    Mark M. Pitt;Mark R. Rosenzweig;Mohammad Nazmul Hassan

  • Health and Nutrient Consumption Across and Within Farm Households

    Mark M. Pitt;Mark R. Rosenzweig

  • The effects of improved nutrition, sanitation, and water quality on child health in high-mortality populations

    Lung-fei Lee;Mark R. Rosenzweig;Mark M. Pitt

  • Estimating the Intrahousehold Incidence of Illness: Child Health and Gender-Inequality in the Allocation of Time

    Mark M. Pitt;Mark R. Rosenzweig

  • Credit programs for the poor and reproductive behavior in low-income countries: are the reported causal relationships the result of heterogeneity bias?

    Mark M. Pin;Shahidur R. Khandker;Signe-Mary Mckernan;M. Abdul Latif

  • Does Micro-Credit Empower Women? Evidence from Bangladesh

    Unknown

  • Smuggling and price disparity

    Mark M. Pitt

  • Subsidy to Promote Girls' Secondary Education: The Female Stipend Program in Bangladesh

    Shahidur Khandker;Mark Pitt;Nobuhiko Fuwa

  • Credit Programmes for the Poor and Seasonality in Rural Bangladesh

    M.M. Pitt;S.R. Khandker

  • Does micro-credit empower women: evidence from Bangladesh

    Mark M. Pitt;Shahidur R. Khandker;Jennifer Cartwright

  • Equity, externalities and energy subsidies The case of kerosine in Indonesia☆

    Mark M. Pitt

  • MICROECONOMETRIC MODELS OF RATIONING, IMPERFECT MARKETS, AND NON-NEGATIVITY CONSTRAINTS

    Lung-Fei Lee;Mark M. Pitt

  • Credit Programs for the Poor and the Health Status of Children in Rural Bangladesh

    Omar Haider Chowdhury;Shahidur R. Khandker;Daniel L. Millimet;Daniel L. Millimet;Mark M. Pitt

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark R. Rosenzweig
Mark R. Rosenzweig Yale University
Lung-fei Lee
Lung-fei Lee The Ohio State University
Daniel L. Millimet
Daniel L. Millimet Southern Methodist University
Joel Slemrod
Joel Slemrod University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Bhaskar Dutta
Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University
Andrew D. Hamilton
Andrew D. Hamilton New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Economics and Finance in the USA can open doors to many related disciplines and career opportunities, especially if you explore online degree options. Careers in business, management, and communication are closely linked and highly valued in finance-driven industries.

If you’re interested in the business side of hospitality, a hospitality degree online offers specialized training in hotel, tourism, and event management with a strong foundation in business and customer relations. For those aiming for leadership positions, pursuing the cheapest aacsb accredited online mba can give you a competitive edge and international recognition.

Human resources plays a key role in organizational success. Explore the top schools for master's in human resources online to develop expertise in managing people and workplace culture. Communication skills are also crucial in the finance sector, especially in roles involving public relations or investor relations. Consider an online masters in communications to enhance your professional profile and career versatility.

Best Scientists Citing Mark M. Pitt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles