World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
48
Citations
5841
World Ranking
3913
National Ranking
446

Margaret Neal publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret Neal sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 92 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Margaret Neal D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret Neal sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Margaret Neal is affiliated with the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences with a focus on Environmental Engineering and Geochemistry and Petrology.

Their work addresses key topics such as CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions, Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis, and Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation.

Margaret Neal's recent publications include:

  • A circular economic approach to the phytoextraction of Zn from basic oxygen steelmaking filtercake using Lemna minor and CO2, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Neal include:

  • A.T. Newnes
  • Y. Marshall
  • C. Grainger
  • John Scullion
  • Dylan Gwynn-Jones

Their research is published primarily in The Science of The Total Environment, representing their main venue for dissemination of findings.

Best Publications

  • Streamwater phosphorus and nitrogen across a gradient in rural–agricultural land use intensity

    H.P. Jarvie;P.J.A. Withers;M.J. Bowes;E.J. Palmer-Felgate

  • Generality of fractal 1/f scaling in catchment tracer time series, and its implications for catchment travel time distributions

    Sarah E. Godsey;Wenche Aas;Thomas A. Clair;Heleen A. de Wit

  • Phosphorus sources, speciation and dynamics in the lowland eutrophic River Kennet, UK

    Helen P Jarvie;Colin Neal;Richard J Williams;Margaret Neal

  • The water quality of the River Thames at a rural site downstream of Oxford

    Colin Neal;Richard J Williams;Margaret Neal;Lal C Bhardwaj

  • An analysis of long-term trends, seasonality and short-term dynamics in water quality data from Plynlimon, Wales

    Sarah J. Halliday;Andrew J. Wade;Richard A. Skeffington;Colin Neal

  • Phosphate measurement in natural waters: two examples of analytical problems associated with silica interference using phosphomolybdic acid methodologies

    Colin Neal;Margaret Neal;Heather Wickham

  • Water quality of treated sewage effluent in a rural area of the upper Thames Basin, southern England, and the impacts of such effluents on riverine phosphorus concentrations

    Colin Neal;Helen P. Jarvie;Margaret Neal;Alison J. Love

  • Trace element inter-relationships for the Humber rivers: inferences for hydrological and chemical controls

    Colin Neal;Alice J. Robson;Hazel A. Jeffery;Martin L. Harrow

  • Boron in the major UK rivers entering the North Sea

    Colin Neal;Kay K Fox;Martin Harrow;Margaret Neal

  • High-frequency water quality time series in precipitation and streamflow: From fragmentary signals to scientific challenge

    Colin Neal;Brian Reynolds;Philip Rowland;David Norris

  • Influence of rural land use on streamwater nutrients and their ecological significance

    Helen P. Jarvie;Paul J. A. Withers;Robin Hodgkinson;Adam Bates

  • The water quality of the River Kennet: initial observations on a lowland chalk stream impacted by sewage inputs and phosphorus remediation.

    Colin Neal;Helen P. Jarvie;Sharon M. Howarth;Paul G. Whitehead

  • Phosphoruscalcium carbonate saturation relationships in a lowland chalk river impacted by sewage inputs and phosphorus remediation: an assessment of phosphorus self-cleansing mechanisms in natural waters

    Colin Neal;Helen P Jarvie;Richard J Williams;Margaret Neal

  • Defining the sources of low-flow phosphorus transfers in complex catchments.

    Joerg Arnscheidt;Philip Jordan;S. Li;S. McCormick

  • Chlorophyll-a in the rivers of eastern England.

    Colin Neal;John Hilton;Andrew J. Wade;Margaret Neal

  • Increasing Iron Concentrations in UK Upland Waters

    C. Neal;S. Lofts;C. D. Evans;B. Reynolds

  • The strategic significance of wastewater sources to pollutant phosphorus levels in English rivers and to environmental management for rural, agricultural and urban catchments.

    Colin Neal;Helen P. Jarvie;Paul J.A. Withers;Brian A. Whitton

  • Relationships between precipitation, stemflow and throughfall for a lowland beech plantation, Black Wood, Hampshire, southern England: findings on interception at a forest edge and the effects of storm damage

    C. Neal;A.J. Robson;C.L. Bhardwaj;T. Conway

  • Within-river nutrient processing in Chalk streams : The Pang and Lambourn, UK.

    Helen P. Jarvie;Colin Neal;Monika D. Jürgens;Elizabeth J. Sutton

  • Phosphorus uptake into algal biofilms in a lowland chalk river.

    H.P Jarvie;C Neal;A Warwick;J White

Frequent Co-Authors

Colin Neal
Colin Neal Ford Motor Company (United States)
Heather Wickham
Heather Wickham UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Helen P. Jarvie
Helen P. Jarvie University of Waterloo
Brian Reynolds
Brian Reynolds Bangor University
Michael J. Bowes
Michael J. Bowes Natural Environment Research Council
Andrew J. Wade
Andrew J. Wade University of Reading
Paul J. A. Withers
Paul J. A. Withers Lancaster University
Richard J. Williams
Richard J. Williams Deakin University
Paul Whitehead
Paul Whitehead University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science opens doors to various interdisciplinary careers and educational pathways. For those looking to pivot or advance quickly, exploring a one year degree for seniors can offer a fast-track option tailored to adult learners seeking to enhance their skills or transition into new fields connected to environmental science.

Professionals interested in the organizational side of scientific information might consider a ala accredited library science programs online. Such programs provide essential training for managing scientific data and resources, crucial in both academic and research settings.

Similarly, pursuing a degree in library science offers knowledge about information management and archiving, which is important for Earth Science professionals working in museums, research institutions, or government agencies.

Finally, incorporating artistic skills can enhance scientific communication. An online photography degree equips students with visual storytelling techniques, valuable for documenting fieldwork, presenting environmental changes, or educating the public through compelling imagery.

Best Scientists Citing Margaret Neal

Trending Scientists