World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
5411
World Ranking
12570
National Ranking
5096

Marc Pomplun publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Pomplun sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 170 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marc Pomplun D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Pomplun sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc Pomplun was affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Boston in the United States. Their research contributions spanned the intersecting areas of computer science and neuroscience, with a focus on applications in medical imaging and cancer detection.

Their main fields of study included:

  • Computer Science
  • Neuroscience

Within these fields, Pomplun explored several subfields:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Neurology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

The topics covered in their work were diverse but centered notably on healthcare and brain research:

  • Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • AI in Cancer Detection
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Gene Expression and Cancer Classification
  • Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Pomplun published extensively in several academic venues, including:

  • IEEE Access
  • Scientific Reports
  • Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
  • International Journal of Intelligent Information and Database Systems
  • Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems

They co-authored multiple papers with regular collaborators such as Hien Dang, K. Martin Sagayam, G. Naveen Sundar, A. Amir Anton Jone, and J. Andrew.

Among the recent publications attributed to Pomplun were:

  • A Novel Hybrid K-Means and GMM Machine Learning Model for Breast Cancer Detection, 2021, IEEE Access
  • Privacy Preserving Attribute-Focused Anonymization Scheme for Healthcare Data Publishing, 2022, IEEE Access
  • Super-resolution Reconstruction of Brain Magnetic Resonance Images via Lightweight Autoencoder, 2021, Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
  • Meningioma Brain Tumor Detection and Classification Using Hybrid CNN Method and RIDGELET Transform, 2023, Scientific Reports
  • An Efficient Approach for Detection and Classification of Cancer Regions in Cervical Images Using Optimization Based CNN Classification Approach, 2022, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems

Pomplun's research often integrated machine learning and artificial intelligence with medical imaging techniques to advance cancer detection and brain tumor classification. The work on privacy-preserving data publishing methods reflected attention to data security concerns in healthcare.

Best Publications

  • A Study on Human Activity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data from Smartphones

    Akram Bayat;Marc Pomplun;Duc A. Tran

  • Visual Span in Expert Chess Players: Evidence From Eye Movements

    Eyal M. Reingold;Neil Charness;Marc Pomplun;Dave M. Stampe

  • The perceptual aspect of skilled performance in chess: evidence from eye movements.

    Neil Charness;Eyal M. Reingold;Marc Pomplun;Dave M. Stampe

  • Semantic guidance of eye movements in real-world scenes.

    Alex D. Hwang;Hsueh-Cheng Wang;Marc Pomplun

  • E-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia

    Matthew H. Schneps;Jenny M. Thomson;Chen Chen;Gerhard Sonnert

  • Guidance of visual attention by semantic information in real-world scenes.

    Chia-Chien Wu;Farahnaz Ahmed Wick;Marc Pomplun

  • Disambiguating Complex Visual Information: Towards Communication of Personal Views of a Scene:

    Marc Pomplun;Helge Ritter;Boris Velichkovsky

  • Investigating the visual span in comparative search: the effects of task difficulty and divided attention

    Marc Pomplun;Eyal M Reingold;Jiye Shen

  • Fixation behavior in observation and imitation of human movement.

    Maja J Matarić;Marc Pomplun

  • Shorter Lines Facilitate Reading in Those Who Struggle

    Matthew H. Schneps;Jenny M. Thomson;Gerhard Sonnert;Marc Pomplun

  • A model of top-down attentional control during visual search in complex scenes.

    Alex D. Hwang;Emily C. Higgins;Marc Pomplun

  • Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays

    Marc Pomplun

  • Area activation: a computational model of saccadic selectivity in visual search

    Marc Pomplun;Eyal M. Reingold;Jiye Shen

  • Distractor Ratio Influences Patterns of Eye Movements during Visual Search

    Jiye Shen;Eyal M Reingold;Marc Pomplun

  • Attending to visual motion

    John K. Tsotsos;Yueju Liu;Julio C. Martinez-Trujillo;Marc Pomplun

  • Comparative visual search: a difference that makes a difference

    Marc Pomplun;Lorenz Sichelschmidt;Karin Wagner;Thomas Clermont

  • Attention and communication: Eye-movement-based research paradigms

    Boris Velichkovsky;Marc Pomplun;Johannes Rieser

  • The attraction of visual attention to texts in real-world scenes.

    Hsueh-Cheng Wang;Marc Pomplun

  • The effects of task difficulty on visual search strategy in virtual 3D displays.

    Marc Pomplun;Tyler W. Garaas;Marisa Carrasco

  • A neural network for 3D gaze recording with binocular eye trackers

    Kai Essig;Marc Pomplun;Helge J. Ritter

  • The 11th International Conference on Mobile Systems and Pervasive Computing (MobiSPC-2014) A Study on Human Activity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data from Smartphones

    Akram Bayat;Marc Pomplun;Duc A. Tran

Frequent Co-Authors

Helge Ritter
Helge Ritter Bielefeld University
Boris M. Velichkovsky
Boris M. Velichkovsky Kurchatov Institute
Eyal M. Reingold
Eyal M. Reingold University of Toronto
Gerhard Sonnert
Gerhard Sonnert Harvard University
Chen Chen
Chen Chen Chongqing University
Julio C. Martinez-Trujillo
Julio C. Martinez-Trujillo University of Western Ontario
John K. Tsotsos
John K. Tsotsos York University
Andreas Sprenger
Andreas Sprenger University of Lübeck
Marisa Carrasco
Marisa Carrasco New York University
Maja J. Matarić
Maja J. Matarić University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a vast range of online degree options and career pathways in related technical fields. Many students seek efficient program formats, such as accelerated cs degree offerings to help them fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner.

If you're interested in broader scientific and engineering disciplines, programs like an environmental science degree or an environmental engineering degree can lead to fulfilling careers in sustainability, policy, and green technology.

Cost is a crucial consideration for many prospective students. Exploring the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online programs can help you balance educational quality with affordability, expanding your options for engineering-related roles.

Whether you choose a direct path in computer science or branch into related STEM fields, online education offers flexibility to customize your learning and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Pomplun

Recently Published Articles