World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
4987
World Ranking
8945
National Ranking
107

Luis F. García publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luis F. García sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 111 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Luis F. García D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luis F. García sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Relationships among extraversion, openness to experience, and sensation seeking

    Anton Aluja;Óscar Garcı́a;Luı́s F Garcı́a

  • Relationship between Empathy and the Big Five Personality Traits in a Sample of Spanish Adolescents

    Victoria del Barrio;Anton Aluja;Luis F. Garcia

  • A cross-cultural shortened form of the ZKPQ (ZKPQ-50-cc) adapted to English, French, German, and Spanish languages.

    Anton Aluja;Jérôme Rossier;Luis F. García;Alois Angleitner

  • A comparative study of Zuckerman's three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg's 50-bipolar adjectives

    Anton Aluja;Óscar Garcı́a;Luis F. Garcı́a

  • Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples

    Anton Aluja;Oscar Garcı́a;Jérôme Rossier;Luis F. Garcı́a

  • Negligible sex differences in general intelligence

    Roberto Colom;Manuel Juan-Espinosa;Francisco Abad;Luı́s F Garcı́a

  • Dimensionality of the Maslach Burnout Inventory in School Teachers

    Anton Aluja;Angel Blanch;Luis F. García

  • Replicability of the three, four and five Zuckerman's personality super-factors: exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the EPQ-RS, ZKPQ and NEO-PI-R

    Anton Aluja;Óscar Garcı́a;Luı́s F. Garcı́a

  • The concept of 'ageing well' in ten Latin American and European countries

    R. Fernández-Ballesteros;L F. Garcia;D. Abarca;E. Blanc

  • RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BIG FIVE PERSONALITY FACTORS AND VALUES

    Anton Aluja;Luis F. Garcia

  • Invariance of the NEO-PI-R factor structure across exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses

    Anton Aluja;Óscar García;Luis F. García;Nicolás Seisdedos

  • Null sex differences in general intelligence: evidence from the WAIS-III.

    Roberto Colom;Luis F. García;Manuel Juan-Espinosa;Francisco J. Abad

  • Bryant's Empathy Index for children and adolescents: psychometric properties in the Spanish language.

    Victoria Del Barrio;Anton Aluja;Luis F. García

  • Intelligence differentiation in adult samples

    Francisco J Abad;Roberto Colom;Manuel Juan-Espinosa;Luı́s F Garcı́a

  • Dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and its relationships with the Three-and the Five-factor personality models.

    Anton Aluja;Jean-Pierre Rolland;Luis F. García;Jérôme Rossier

  • Is Openness to Experience an Independent Personality Dimension? Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Openness Domain and its NEO-PI-R Facets

    Luis F. García;Anton Aluja;Óscar García;Lara Cuevas

  • Relationships between adolescents' memory of parental rearing styles, social values and socialisation behavior traits

    Anton Aluja;Victoria del Barrio;Luis F. García

  • Lay concept of aging well: cross-cultural comparisons.

    Rocío Fernández-Ballesteros;Luis F. García;Digma Abarca;Lidia Blanc

  • A psychometric analysis of the revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire short scale

    Anton Aluja;Óscar Garcı́a;Luı́s.F Garcı́a

  • Association of androgen receptor gene, CAG and GGN repeat length polymorphism and impulsive-disinhibited personality traits in inmates: the role of short-long haplotype.

    Anton Aluja;Luis F. García;Angel Blanch;Joan Fibla

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert H. Gilman
Robert H. Gilman Johns Hopkins University
W. Henry Boom
W. Henry Boom Case Western Reserve University
Stephen M. Graham
Stephen M. Graham University of Melbourne
Christoph Lange
Christoph Lange University of Lübeck
Beate Kampmann
Beate Kampmann Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Jerrold J. Ellner
Jerrold J. Ellner Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Sanjay Basu
Sanjay Basu Stanford University
Nathan Lo
Nathan Lo University of Sydney
Sarman Singh
Sarman Singh Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal
Megan Murray
Megan Murray Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Luis F. García

Recently Published Articles