World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lluís Fuentemilla

Lluís Fuentemilla

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
4605
World Ranking
9212
National Ranking
155

Lluís Fuentemilla publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lluís Fuentemilla sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 83 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Lluís Fuentemilla D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lluís Fuentemilla sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lluís Fuentemilla is affiliated with the University of Barcelona in Spain and works primarily in the field of Neuroscience. Their research focus is on cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying memory and brain function.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • Theta rhythm supports hippocampus-dependent integrative encoding in schematic/semantic memory networks, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Weakly encoded memories due to acute sleep restriction can be rescued after one night of recovery sleep, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Neural oscillations and event-related potentials reveal how semantic congruence drives long-term memory in both young and older humans, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Gamma amplitude is coupled to opposed hippocampal theta-phase states during the encoding and retrieval of episodic memories in humans, 2023, Current Biology
  • Post-encoding Reactivation Is Related to Learning of Episodes in Humans, 2022, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Lluís Fuentemilla's frequent coauthors include:

  • Xiongbo Wu
  • Josué García-Arch
  • Marc Sabio-Albert
  • Pau A. Packard
  • Nico Bunzeck

Their work often appears in the following publication venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science

Main fields of study encompass Neuroscience, with subfields including:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

The main topics of research activity cover:

  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Identity, Memory, and Therapy

Best Publications

  • Go and no-go learning in reward and punishment: interactions between affect and effect.

    Marc Guitart-Masip;Quentin J.M. Huys;Quentin J.M. Huys;Lluis Fuentemilla;Peter Dayan

  • Action Dominates Valence in Anticipatory Representations in the Human Striatum and Dopaminergic Midbrain

    Marc Guitart-Masip;Lluis Fuentemilla;Dominik R. Bach;Quentin J. M. Huys

  • Theta-Coupled Periodic Replay in Working Memory

    Lluís Fuentemilla;Will D. Penny;Nathan Cashdollar;Nico Bunzeck

  • Human Hippocampus Arbitrates Approach-Avoidance Conflict.

    Dominik R. Bach;Dominik R. Bach;Dominik R. Bach;Marc Guitart-Masip;Marc Guitart-Masip;Pau A. Packard;Júlia Miró

  • Theta EEG oscillatory activity and auditory change detection

    Ll. Fuentemilla;J. Marco-Pallarés;J. Marco-Pallarés;T.F. Münte;C. Grau

  • Updating Fearful Memories with Extinction Training during Reconsolidation: A Human Study Using Auditory Aversive Stimuli

    Javiera P. Oyarzún;Diana Lopez-Barroso;Lluís Fuentemilla;David Cucurell

  • Event Boundaries Trigger Rapid Memory Reinstatement of the Prior Events to Promote Their Representation in Long-Term Memory.

    Ignasi Sols;Sarah DuBrow;Lila Davachi;Lluís Fuentemilla

  • Theta-Alpha Oscillations Bind the Hippocampus, Prefrontal Cortex, and Striatum during Recollection: Evidence from Simultaneous EEG–fMRI

    Nora A. Herweg;Thore Apitz;Gregor Leicht;Christioph Mulert

  • Brain oscillatory activity associated with task switching and feedback processing.

    Toni Cunillera;Lluís Fuentemilla;Jose Periañez;Josep Marco-Pallarès

  • Theta oscillations orchestrate medial temporal lobe and neocortex in remembering autobiographical memories.

    Lluís Fuentemilla;Gareth R. Barnes;Emrah Düzel;Emrah Düzel;Emrah Düzel;Brian Levine

  • Modulation of spectral power and of phase resetting of EEG contributes differentially to the generation of auditory event-related potentials.

    Lluís Fuentemilla;Josep Marco-Pallarés;Josep Marco-Pallarés;Carles Grau

  • First human trials of a dry electrophysiology sensor using a carbon nanotube array interface

    G. Ruffini;S. Dunne;L. Fuentemilla;C. Grau

  • Hippocampus-Dependent Strengthening of Targeted Memories via Reactivation during Sleep in Humans

    Lluís Fuentemilla;Júlia Miró;Pablo Ripollés;Adrià Vilà-Balló

  • Replay of Very Early Encoding Representations during Recollection

    Anna Jafarpour;Lluis Fuentemilla;Aidan J. Horner;Will Penny

  • Rapid Memory Reactivation at Movie Event Boundaries Promotes Episodic Encoding

    Marta Silva;Christopher Baldassano;Lluís Fuentemilla

  • Human Hippocampus Arbitrates Approach-Avoidance Conflict

    Unknown

  • The right inferior frontal cortex in response inhibition: A tDCS-ERP co-registration study.

    Toni Cunillera;Debora Brignani;David Cucurell;Lluís Fuentemilla

  • ENOBIO dry electrophysiology electrode; first human trial plus wireless electrode system

    G. Ruffini;S. Dunne;E. Farres;I. Cester

  • Dynamic Causal Models for phase coupling

    W D Penny;Litvak;L Fuentemilla;E Duzel

  • A simultaneous modulation of reactive and proactive inhibition processes by anodal tDCS on the right inferior frontal cortex.

    Toni Cunillera;Lluís Fuentemilla;Debora Brignani;David Cucurell

  • Individual Differences in True and False Memory Retrieval Are Related to White Matter Brain Microstructure

    Lluís Fuentemilla;Estela Càmara;Thomas F Münte;Ulrike M Krämer

Frequent Co-Authors

Emrah Düzel
Emrah Düzel German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Josep Marco-Pallarés
Josep Marco-Pallarés University of Barcelona
Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Nico Bunzeck
Nico Bunzeck University of Lübeck
Giulio Ruffini
Giulio Ruffini Light Prescriptions Innovators (Spain)
Raymond J. Dolan
Raymond J. Dolan University College London
Dominik R. Bach
Dominik R. Bach University of Bonn
Marc Guitart-Masip
Marc Guitart-Masip Karolinska Institute
William D. Penny
William D. Penny University of East Anglia
Quentin J. M. Huys
Quentin J. M. Huys University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Neuroscience, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many universities now offer flexible pathways, including the option to earn an accelerated bachelor's degree online. This option allows you to complete your studies faster and enter the workforce sooner.

Choosing a financially rewarding field is also important. Some of the highest paying bachelor degrees and highest paying college majors include not only neuroscience but also areas like engineering, computer science, and health-related subjects. Combining neuroscience with these in-demand skills can further enhance your earning potential.

Cost is a key consideration, especially for international or out-of-state students. Look for an online school that accepts fafsa to maximize your financial aid options and minimize student debt. Taking advantage of scholarships and grants can make a neuro-focused degree more accessible and affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Lluís Fuentemilla

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles