World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
55
Citations
15831
World Ranking
1050
National Ranking
652

Mark McClellan publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark McClellan sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 242 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Mark McClellan D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark McClellan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Mark McClellan is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has a substantial body of research across economics, medicine, and health professions. Their work spans multiple interconnected fields, emphasizing the intersection of economic evaluation, healthcare policy, and clinical outcomes.

The following are some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Mark McClellan:

  • Food Is Medicine: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association, 2023, Circulation
  • The potential for artificial intelligence to transform healthcare: perspectives from international health leaders, 2024, npj Digital Medicine
  • Understanding Use of Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence to Support Regulatory Decisions on Medical Product Effectiveness, 2021, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
  • Advancing Value-Based Models for Heart Failure, 2020, Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
  • Comparing Associations of State Reopening Strategies with COVID-19 Burden, 2020, Journal of General Internal Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with McClellan include:

  • R. S. Saunders
  • William K. Bleser
  • Marianne Hamilton Lopez
  • Rebecca Whitaker
  • Charles N. Kahn

McClellan publishes regularly in various venues with repeated contributions to:

  • Forefront Group
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
  • JAMA Health Forum
  • Health Affairs Scholar
  • Health Affairs

Their primary fields of study cover:

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance
  • Medicine
  • Health Professions

Within these disciplines, they have focused on subfields including:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • General Health Professions
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Oncology

The main research topics addressed in their publications comprise:

  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Best Publications

  • Does More Intensive Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Elderly Reduce Mortality? Analysis Using Instrumental Variables

    M. Mcclellan;B. J. Mcneil;J. P. Newhouse

  • Is Technological Change In Medicine Worth It

    David M. Cutler;Mark McClellan

  • Is More Information Better? The Effects of 'Report Cards' on Health Care Providers

    David Dranove;Daniel Kessler;Mark McClellan;Mark Satterthwaite

  • Is Hospital Competition Socially Wasteful

    Daniel P. Kessler;Mark B. McClellan

  • Do Doctors Practice Defensive Medicine

    Daniel P. Kessler;Mark B. McClellan

  • Econometrics in outcomes research: the use of instrumental variables.

    Joseph P. Newhouse;Mark McClellan

  • Association of renal insufficiency with treatment and outcomes after myocardial infarction in elderly patients.

    Michael G. Shlipak;Paul A. Heidenreich;Haruko Noguchi;Glenn M. Chertow

  • A National Strategy To Put Accountable Care Into Practice

    Mark McClellan;Aaron N. McKethan;Julie L. Lewis;Joachim Roski

  • Developing the Sentinel System — A National Resource for Evidence Development

    Rachel E. Behrman;Joshua S. Benner;Jeffrey S. Brown;Mark McClellan

  • How does managed care do it

    David M. Cutler;Mark McClellan;Joseph P. Newhouse

  • Are Medical Prices Declining? Evidence from Heart Attack Treatments

    David M. Cutler;Mark McClellan;Joseph P. Newhouse;Dahlia Remler

  • Using Digital Health Technology to Better Generate Evidence and Deliver Evidence-Based Care

    Abhinav Sharma;Abhinav Sharma;Abhinav Sharma;Robert A. Harrington;Mark B. McClellan;Mintu P. Turakhia

  • Fostering Accountable Health Care: Moving Forward In Medicare

    Elliott S. Fisher;Mark B. McClellan;John Bertko;Steven M. Lieberman

  • Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Hospitals That Disproportionately Treat Black Patients

    Jonathan Skinner;Jonathan Skinner;Amitabh Chandra;Amitabh Chandra;Douglas Staiger;Douglas Staiger;Julie Lee

  • The New Sentinel Network — Improving the Evidence of Medical-Product Safety

    Richard Platt;Marcus Wilson;K. Arnold Chan;Joshua S. Benner

  • Trends in Inpatient Treatment Intensity among Medicare Beneficiaries at the End of Life

    Amber E. Barnato;Mark B. Mcclellan;Christopher R. Kagay;Alan M. Garber;Alan M. Garber

  • Call to Action: Urgent Challenges in Cardiovascular Disease: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association.

    Mark McClellan;Nancy Brown;Robert M. Califf;John J. Warner

  • Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Management Strategies for Patients with Solitary Pulmonary Nodules

    Michael K. Gould;Gillian D. Sanders;Paul G. Barnett;Chara E. Rydzak

  • Trends in treatment and outcomes for acute myocardial infarction: 1975-1995.

    Paul A Heidenreich;Paul A Heidenreich;Mark McClellan

  • Vital Directions for Health and Health Care: Priorities From a National Academy of Medicine Initiative

    Victor J. Dzau;Mark B. McClellan;J. Michael McGinnis;Sheila P. Burke

  • Medicare coverage of ICDs

    Mark B. McClellan;Sean R. Tunis

  • Managed care, hospice use, site of death, and medical expenditures in the last year of life

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;Arlene S. Ash;Wei Yu;Gail Gazelle

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel P. Kessler
Daniel P. Kessler Stanford University
David M. Cutler
David M. Cutler Harvard University
Joseph P. Newhouse
Joseph P. Newhouse Harvard University
Paul A. Heidenreich
Paul A. Heidenreich Stanford University
Jonathan S. Skinner
Jonathan S. Skinner Dartmouth College
David A. Wise
David A. Wise Harvard University
Alan M. Garber
Alan M. Garber Baylor College of Medicine
Douglas O. Staiger
Douglas O. Staiger Dartmouth College
Laurence C. Baker
Laurence C. Baker Stanford University
Dana P. Goldman
Dana P. Goldman University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to a variety of rewarding careers. Many students look for options that combine flexibility, accreditation, and affordability. For those interested in social work, cheap online msw programs let you complete your qualifications without heavy financial burdens. These programs cater to working professionals or those balancing other commitments.

If your goal is to specialize further, a bcba degree can prepare you for a career as a board certified behavior analyst—a field with growing demand and competitive salaries. Time is also a key factor for many students. Fast-track degrees like accelerated online msw programs and the fastest online psychology degree allow you to enter the workforce sooner or advance to higher positions.

With a range of online options and career pathways, students can match their academic ambitions with practical considerations, making Social Sciences and Humanities a versatile and accessible field to study in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Mark McClellan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles