What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Microeconomics
- Macroeconomics
- Finance
Odd Rune Straume mainly focuses on Competition, Microeconomics, Incentive, Quality and Health care.
Odd Rune Straume studied Competition and Reference pricing that intersect with Product, Panel data, Market share, Monetary economics and Vertical differentiation.
In the field of Microeconomics, his study on Monopoly, Production and Reservation price overlaps with subjects such as Commit and Regulator.
His studies in Incentive integrate themes in fields like Technological change, Duopoly, Globalization and Labour economics.
His work deals with themes such as Health services research and Product differentiation, which intersect with Quality.
His studies deal with areas such as Gatekeeping, Profit and Investment as well as Health care.
His most cited work include:
- Hospital Competition and Quality with Regulated Prices (119 citations)
- Downstream merger with upstream market power (113 citations)
- Quality and Location Choices under Price Regulation (106 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Odd Rune Straume mostly deals with Competition, Microeconomics, Quality, Incentive and Labour economics.
His study in Competition is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Globalization, Industrial organization, Monetary economics and Reference pricing.
His study in the field of Monopoly is also linked to topics like Social Welfare, Differential game, Empirical evidence and Unit.
The various areas that Odd Rune Straume examines in his Quality study include Health care, Welfare and Ex-ante.
Market integration is closely connected to Product market in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Incentive.
His Labour economics study incorporates themes from Productivity and Panel data.
He most often published in these fields:
- Competition (68.58%)
- Microeconomics (48.65%)
- Quality (46.62%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Competition (68.58%)
- Quality (46.62%)
- Demographic economics (11.49%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Competition, Quality, Demographic economics, Health care and Industrial organization are his primary areas of study.
His Competition study combines topics in areas such as Incentive, Product and Patient choice.
His research in Incentive intersects with topics in Actuarial science and Payment.
His Quality research integrates issues from Microeconomics, Investment and Welfare.
Odd Rune Straume integrates many fields in his works, including Microeconomics and Unit.
As a part of the same scientific study, Odd Rune Straume usually deals with the Health care, concentrating on Equity and frequently concerns with Fixed price and Supply and demand.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Do Treatment Decisions Depend on Physicians` Financial Incentives? (24 citations)
- Do Treatment Decisions Depend on Physicians` Financial Incentives? (24 citations)
- Hospital Mergers with Regulated Prices (23 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Microeconomics
- Macroeconomics
- Finance
His primary scientific interests are in Competition, Health care, Payment, Industrial organization and Quality.
The study of Competition is intertwined with the study of Average cost in a number of ways.
Within one scientific family, he focuses on topics pertaining to Incentive under Payment, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Fixed effects model, Profit, Actuarial science and Fee-for-service.
His Industrial organization research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Total factor productivity, Productivity, Panel data and Market economy.
His work carried out in the field of Quality brings together such families of science as Econometrics, Microeconomics and Welfare.
He interconnects Higher education and Yield in the investigation of issues within Microeconomics.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
