World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
55
Citations
10038
World Ranking
3587
National Ranking
5

Lev L. Kisselev publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lev L. Kisselev sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 219 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Lev L. Kisselev D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lev L. Kisselev sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lev L. Kisselev was affiliated with the Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology in the Russian Federation during their scientific career.

While specific publications and research outputs are not available, Kisselev's body of work was associated with this prominent institution known for molecular biology research.

No detailed records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or specific publication venues have been documented to provide further insight into their research impact or collaborations.

Similarly, there is no publicly available information on specific fields of study, subfields, or main topics addressed in their academic work.

Information concerning awards or honors received by Kisselev is not currently accessible.

The absence of detailed bibliometric data and research details limits a comprehensive analysis of Kisselev's scientific contributions beyond their institutional affiliation and status as a deceased researcher.

Best Publications

  • A highly conserved eukaryotic protein family possessing properties of polypeptide chain release factor

    Lyudmila Frolova;Lyudmila Frolova;Xavier Le Goff;Hanne H. Rasmussen;Sergey Cheperegin

  • Polypeptide Release Factors in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes: Same Function, Different Structure

    Lev Kisselev

  • Mutations in the highly conserved GGQ motif of class 1 polypeptide release factors abolish ability of human eRF1 to trigger peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis.

    Ludmila Yu. Frolova;Ruslan Yu. Tsivkovskii;Galina F. Sivolobova;Nina Yu. Oparina

  • In vitro reconstitution of eukaryotic translation reveals cooperativity between release factors eRF1 and eRF3.

    Elena Z. Alkalaeva;Andrey V. Pisarev;Lyudmila Y. Frolova;Lev L. Kisselev

  • Termination of translation: interplay of mRNA, rRNAs and release factors?

    Lev Kisselev;Måns Ehrenberg;Ludmila Frolova

  • Eukaryotic polypeptide chain release factor eRF3 is an eRF1- and ribosome-dependent guanosine triphosphatase.

    L Frolova;X Le Goff;G Zhouravleva;E Davydova

  • Translational termination comes of age.

    Lev L. Kisselev;Richard H. Buckingham

  • DIADENOSINE OLIGOPHOSPHATES (APNA), A NOVEL CLASS OF SIGNALLING MOLECULES?

    Lev L Kisselev;Lev L Kisselev;Just Justesen;Alexey D Wolfson;Lyudmila Yu Frolova;Lyudmila Yu Frolova

  • Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases: sone recent results and achievements.

    Lev L. Kisselev;Ol'Ga O. Favorova

  • C-terminal domains of human translation termination factors eRF1 and eRF3 mediate their in vivo interaction

    Tatyana I. Merkulova;Lyudmila Y. Frolova;Lyudmila Y. Frolova;Monique Lazar;Jacques Camonis

  • Highly conserved NIKS tetrapeptide is functionally essential in eukaryotic translation termination factor eRF1.

    Ludmila Frolova;Alim Seit-Nebi;Lev Kisselev

  • Class-1 translation termination factors: invariant GGQ minidomain is essential for release activity and ribosome binding but not for stop codon recognition.

    Alim Seit-Nebi;Ludmila Frolova;Just Justesen;Lev Kisselev

  • The essential role of the invariant GGQ motif in the function and stability in vivo of bacterial release factors RF1 and RF2.

    Liliana Mora;Valérie Heurgué‐Hamard;Stéphanie Champ;Måns Ehrenberg

  • Translation termination in eukaryotes: polypeptide release factor eRF1 is composed of functionally and structurally distinct domains.

    Ludmila Yu. Frolova;Tatyana I. Merkulova;Lev L. Kisselev

  • Discovery of frequent homozygous deletions in chromosome 3p21.3 LUCA and AP20 regions in renal, lung and breast carcinomas.

    Vera N Senchenko;Jian Liu;Witaly Loginov;Igor Bazov

  • Polypeptide chain release factors

    Richard H. Buckingham;Guido Grentzmann;Lev Kisselev;Lev Kisselev

  • Eukaryotic mRNAs encoding abundant and scarce proteins are statistically dissimilar in many structural features

    Alex V Kochetov;Igor V Ischenko;Denis G Vorobiev;Alexander E Kel

  • RBSP3 (HYA22) is a tumor suppressor gene implicated in major epithelial malignancies

    Vladimir I. Kashuba;Jingfeng Li;Jingfeng Li;Fuli Wang;Vera N. Senchenko;Vera N. Senchenko

  • Conversion of omnipotent translation termination factor eRF1 into ciliate-like UGA-only unipotent eRF1

    Alim Seit‐Nebi;Ludmila Frolova;Lev Kisselev

  • The Glutamine Residue of the Conserved GGQ Motif in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Release Factor eRF1 Is Methylated by the Product of the YDR140w Gene

    Valérie Heurgué-Hamard;Stéphanie Champ;Liliana Mora;Tatiana Merkoulova-Rainon

Frequent Co-Authors

Eugene R. Zabarovsky
Eugene R. Zabarovsky Karolinska Institute
George Klein
George Klein Karolinska Institute
Michael I. Lerman
Michael I. Lerman National Institutes of Health
Rando Allikmets
Rando Allikmets Columbia University
Olga I. Lavrik
Olga I. Lavrik Russian Academy of Sciences
Alexei Protopopov
Alexei Protopopov The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Claes Wahlestedt
Claes Wahlestedt University of Miami
Ingemar Ernberg
Ingemar Ernberg Karolinska Institute
Alexander S. Graphodatsky
Alexander S. Graphodatsky Novosibirsk State University
Michael Dean
Michael Dean National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're passionate about genetics, there are several related online degrees and diverse career pathways available in the broader field of healthcare and life sciences. These options provide flexibility and potential cost savings for students at various stages of their educational journey.

For those interested in nursing, several nursing colleges that don’t require SAT or other challenging entrance exams exist, making entry into the field more accessible. Students seeking a faster route to licensure might consider fast-track LPN programs online, which offer accelerated pathways to become a Licensed Practical Nurse.

For future healthcare leaders, pursuing one of the most affordable MHA programs can unlock opportunities in hospital management and policy. Meanwhile, those aiming for research or academic careers in nursing will find value in the cheapest online nursing PhD programs.

Exploring these related online degrees can help you find a career path tailored to your skills, interests, and goals within the fast-evolving healthcare and genetics landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Lev L. Kisselev

Recently Published Articles