World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
57
Citations
11364
World Ranking
2269
National Ranking
962

Leonardo Seeber publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonardo Seeber sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 227 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Leonardo Seeber D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonardo Seeber sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Leonardo Seeber is affiliated with the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with particular expertise in geophysics and earth-surface processes. Additional subfields include atmospheric science, management, monitoring, policy and law, and oceanography.

The main topics of Leonardo Seeber's work include earthquake and tectonic studies, geological formations and processes, geology and paleoclimatology research, geological and geochemical analysis, landslides and related hazards, marine and environmental studies, and maritime and coastal archaeology.

Frequent coauthors in their work include Cecilia M. McHugh, M. S. Steckler, Michael Strasser, Toshiya Kanamatsu, and Paul Betka.

Their recent papers cover a variety of topics and publication venues:

  • Isotopic and sedimentary signature of megathrust ruptures along the Japan subduction margin (2020, Marine Geology)
  • Provenance Shifts During Neogene Brahmaputra Delta Progradation Tied to Coupled Climate and Tectonic Change in the Eastern Himalaya (2021, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems)
  • Cascading hazards of a major Bengal basin earthquake and abrupt avulsion of the Ganges River (2024, Nature Communications)
  • Neogene shallow-marine and fluvial sediment dispersal, burial, and exhumation in the ancestral Brahmaputra delta: Indo-Burman Ranges, India (2020, Journal of Sedimentary Research)
  • Post-500 ka and Holocene activity on distributed faults of the North Anatolian Fault system along the southern shelf of Marmara Sea, Turkey (2022, Tectonophysics)

Frequent publication venues featuring Leonardo Seeber's work include Marine Geology, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, Nature Communications, Journal of Sedimentary Research, and Tectonophysics.

Best Publications

  • River profiles along the Himalayan arc as indicators of active tectonics

    L Seeber;V Gornitz

  • Erosion, Himalayan geodynamics, and the geomorphology of metamorphism

    Peter K. Zeitler;Anne S. Meltzer;Peter O. Koons;David Craw

  • Seismicity and Continental Subduction in the Himalayan Arc

    Leonardo Seeber;John G. Armbruster;Richard C. Quittmeyer

  • Great Detachment Earthquakes Along the Himalayan Arc and Long-Term Forecasting

    Leonardo Seeber;John G. Armbruster

  • 40 – Case Histories of Induced and Triggered Seismicity

    Arthur F. McGarr;David Simpson;L. Seeber

  • Submarine fault scarps in the Sea of Marmara pull-apart (North Anatolian Fault): Implications for seismic hazard in Istanbul

    Rolando Armijo;Nicolas Pondard;Bertrand Meyer;Gulsen Uçarkus

  • A shallow fault-zone structure illuminated by trapped waves in the Karadere–Duzce branch of the North Anatolian Fault, western Turkey

    Yehuda Ben-Zion;Zhigang Peng;David Okaya;Leonardo Seeber

  • Cross-fault triggering in the November 1987 Superstition Hills Earthquake Sequence, southern California

    K. W. Hudnut;L. Seeber;J. Pacheco

  • Locked and loading megathrust linked to active subduction beneath the Indo-Burman Ranges

    Michael S. Steckler;Dhiman Ranjan Mondal;Dhiman Ranjan Mondal;Syed Humayun Akhter;Leonardo Seeber

  • Collision of the Ganges Brahmaputra Delta with the Burma Arc: Implications for earthquake hazard

    Michael S. Steckler;S. Humayun Akhter;Leonardo Seeber

  • On the Modified Mercalli intensities and magnitudes of the 1811–1812 New Madrid earthquakes

    Susan E. Hough;John G. Armbruster;Leonardo Seeber;Jerry F. Hough

  • Focal depths and fault plane solutions of earthquakes and active tectonics of the Himalaya

    Jean Baranowski;John Armbruster;Leonardo Seeber;Peter Molnar

  • Crustal reworking at Nanga Parbat, Pakistan: Metamorphic consequences of thermal-mechanical coupling facilitated by erosion

    Peter K. Zeitler;Peter O. Koons;Michael P. Bishop;C. Page Chamberlain

  • Attenuation of high‐frequency shear waves in the crust: Measurements from New York State, South Africa, and southern California

    Arthur Frankel;Art McGarr;John Bicknell;Jim Mori

  • Seismic evidence for conjugate slip and block rotation within the San Andreas Fault System, southern California

    Craig Nicholson;Leonardo Seeber;Patrick Williams;Lynn R. Sykes

  • InSAR measurements of compaction and subsidence in the Ganges-Brahmaputra Delta, Bangladesh

    Stephanie A. Higgins;Stephanie A. Higgins;Irina Overeem;Irina Overeem;Michael S. Steckler;James P. M. Syvitski;James P. M. Syvitski

  • The northwestern termination of the Himalayan Mountain Front: Active tectonics from microearthquakes

    J. Armbruster;L. Seeber;K. H. Jacob

  • Strain partitioning along the Himalayan arc and the Nanga Parbat antiform

    Leonardo Seeber;Arnaud Pêcher

  • Submarine earthquake geology along the North Anatolia Fault in the Marmara Sea, Turkey: A model for transform basin sedimentation

    Cecilia M.G. McHugh;Cecilia M.G. McHugh;Leonardo Seeber;Marie-Helene Cormier;Jessica Dutton

  • Early Middle Paleozoic Intraplate Orogeny in the Ogcheon Belt (South Korea): A new insight on the Paleozoic buildup of east Asia

    Dominique Cluzel;Laurent Jolivet;Jean-Paul Cadet

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael S. Steckler
Michael S. Steckler Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Marie-Helene Cormier
Marie-Helene Cormier University of Rhode Island
Steven L. Goodbred
Steven L. Goodbred Vanderbilt University
Chris Paola
Chris Paola University of Minnesota
Susan E. Hough
Susan E. Hough United States Geological Survey
Stuart N. Thomson
Stuart N. Thomson University of Arizona
Naci Görür
Naci Görür Istanbul Technical University
Lynn R. Sykes
Lynn R. Sykes Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Felix Waldhauser
Felix Waldhauser Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Ken Ikehara
Ken Ikehara National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science opens doors to a variety of career options, and pursuing related online degrees can enhance your skills and employability. For veterans interested in expanding their qualifications, exploring military friendly online Spanish degree programs can provide valuable communication skills, especially in environmental consulting roles that require bilingual abilities.

For those looking to diversify creatively or explore environmental storytelling, considering an MFA online program can be beneficial. These programs help develop expertise in environmental writing, media, or fine arts connected to Earth Science themes.

If you are aiming for leadership roles in natural resource management or environmental organizations, an online human resource management masters programs can equip you with skills in managing teams, facilitating sustainable projects, and organizational development.

For seniors or those seeking accelerated pathways into Earth Science careers, exploring one year degree programs for seniors provides an efficient way to gain credentials without long-term commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Leonardo Seeber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles