World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
32
Citations
4429
World Ranking
3145
National Ranking
122

Laura Savoldi publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura Savoldi sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 328 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Laura Savoldi D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura Savoldi sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Recent progress in developing a feasible and integrated conceptual design of the WCLL BB in EUROfusion project

    A. Del Nevo;P. Arena;G. Caruso;P. Chiovaro

  • The ITER toroidal field model coil project

    A. Ulbricht;J.L. Duchateau;W.H. Fietz;Y. Ilyin

  • The 4C code for the cryogenic circuit conductor and coil modeling in ITER

    L. Savoldi Richard;F. Casella;B. Fiori;Roberto Zanino

  • Progress of the ITER central solenoid model coil programme

    H. Tsuji;K. Okuno;R. Thome;E. Salpietro

  • The DEMO Water-Cooled Lead–Lithium Breeding Blanket: Design Status at the End of the Pre-Conceptual Design Phase

    Unknown

  • Test of the ITER central solenoid model coil and CS insert

    N. Martovetsky;P. Michael;J. Minervini;A. Radovinsky

  • Characterization of Particle Flow in a Free-Falling Solar Particle Receiver

    Clifford K. Ho;Joshua M Christian;David Romano;Julius Yellowhair

  • Test Results of Two ITER TF Conductor Short Samples Using High Current Density Nb $_{3}$ Sn Strands

    P. Bruzzone;M. Bagnasco;D. Ciazynski;A. della Corte

  • M&M: Multi-conductor Mithrandir code for the simulation of thermal-hydraulic transients in superconducting magnets

    Laura Savoldi;Roberto Zanino

  • Overview of Progress on the EU DEMO Reactor Magnet System Design

    L. Zani;C. M. Bayer;M. E. Biancolini;R. Bonifetto

  • The DEMO magnet system – Status and future challenges

    Unknown

  • Influence of femtosecond laser marking on the corrosion resistance of stainless steels

    Unknown

  • Advance in the conceptual design of the European DEMO magnet system

    K. Sedlak;V. A. Anvar;N. Bagrets;M. E. Biancolini

  • Design and Integration of the EU-DEMO Water-Cooled Lead Lithium Breeding Blanket

    Unknown

  • ITER Central Solenoid Insert Test Results

    Nicolai Martovetsky;Takaaki Isono;Denis Bessette;Yoshikazu Takahashi

  • Analysis of the performance of linear Fresnel collectors: Encapsulated vs. evacuated tubes

    Mattia Cagnoli;D. Mazzei;M. Procopio;V. Russo

  • Identification of accident sequences for the DEMO plant

    Tonio Pinna;Dario Carloni;Andrea Carpignano;Sergio Ciattaglia

  • THELMA code electromagnetic model of ITER superconducting cables and application to the ENEA Stability Experiment

    M. Ciotti;Arend Nijhuis;P.L. Ribani;L. Savoldi Richard

  • A critical assessment of thermal–hydraulic modeling of HTS twisted-stacked-tape cable conductors for fusion applications

    Andrea Zappatore;Walter H Fietz;Reinhard Heller;Laura Savoldi

  • First test results for the ITER central solenoid model coil

    T. Kato;H. Tsuji;T. Ando;Y. Takahashi

Frequent Co-Authors

Roberto Zanino
Roberto Zanino Polytechnic University of Turin
Pierluigi Bruzzone
Pierluigi Bruzzone École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Manfred Thumm
Manfred Thumm Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Enrico Zio
Enrico Zio Polytechnic University of Milan
Arend Nijhuis
Arend Nijhuis University of Twente
Antonio Cammi
Antonio Cammi Polytechnic University of Milan
Clifford K. Ho
Clifford K. Ho Sandia National Laboratories

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can help enhance your career prospects in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Many students consider branching into interdisciplinary fields, such as speech-language pathology, which shares an emphasis on technical knowledge and problem-solving skills. When planning your educational path, deciding how many slp grad schools should I apply to is an important step to increase your chances of acceptance and find the best fit.

For those concerned about admission criteria, researching the easiest speech pathology programs to get into can offer valuable insights. Identifying programs that align with your academic background and goals ensures a smoother application process and better match with your interests.

Cost is another crucial factor when considering online degrees. Understanding the speech pathology degree cost online helps you budget effectively and evaluate financial aid options. Affordable tuition combined with quality education is key for long-term career planning.

Veterans looking to pursue further education should explore military friendly online speech pathology degree programs. These programs provide tailored support and benefits, making it easier to transition into civilian careers while advancing your qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing Laura Savoldi

Recently Published Articles