World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
33
Citations
4336
World Ranking
3029
National Ranking
111

Antonio Cammi publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Cammi sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 364 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Antonio Cammi D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Cammi sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • POD-Galerkin method for finite volume approximation of Navier–Stokes and RANS equations

    Stefano Lorenzi;Antonio Cammi;Lelio Luzzi;Gianluigi Rozza

  • Molten salt mixture properties in RELAP5 code for thermodynamic solar applications

    Unknown

  • An extended version of the SERPENT-2 code to investigate fuel burn-up and core material evolution of the Molten Salt Fast Reactor

    Unknown

  • Development of an OpenFOAM model for the Molten Salt Fast Reactor transient analysis

    Unknown

  • Modelling and analysis of the MSFR transient behaviour

    Unknown

  • A multi-physics modelling approach to the dynamics of Molten Salt Reactors

    Unknown

  • Investigation of the MSFR core physics and fuel cycle characteristics

    Unknown

  • Calculating the effective delayed neutron fraction in the Molten Salt Fast Reactor: Analytical, deterministic and Monte Carlo approaches

    Unknown

  • The analytic hierarchy process as a systematic approach to the identification of important parameters for the reliability assessment of passive systems

    E Zio;M Cantarella;A Cammi

  • RELAP5/MOD3.3 study on density wave instabilities in single channel and two parallel channels

    Unknown

  • Analysis of different containment models for IRIS small break LOCA, using GOTHIC and RELAP5 codes

    Unknown

  • Benchmark evaluation of reactor critical parameters and neutron fluxes distributions at zero power for the TRIGA Mark II reactor of the University of Pavia using the Monte Carlo code MCNP

    Unknown

  • Neutronic benchmark of the molten salt fast reactor in the frame of the EVOL and MARS collaborative projects

    Unknown

  • Assessment of analytical and numerical models on experimental data for the study of single-phase natural circulation dynamics in a vertical loop

    Unknown

  • Development of a multiphysics model for the study of fuel compressibility effects in the Molten Salt Fast Reactor

    Unknown

  • A scheme of correlation for frictional pressure drop in steam–water two-phase flow in helicoidal tubes

    Unknown

  • Experimental and theoretical studies on density wave instabilities in helically coiled tubes

    Unknown

  • Comparison of a Modal Method and a Proper Orthogonal Decomposition approach for multi-group time-dependent reactor spatial kinetics

    Alberto Sartori;Davide Baroli;Antonio Cammi;Davide Chiesa;Davide Chiesa

  • Modelling and control strategy of the Italian LBE-XADS

    Unknown

  • Multiphysics analysis of the MSFR helium bubbling system: A comparison between neutron diffusion, SP3 neutron transport and Monte Carlo approaches

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Giammarchi
Marco Giammarchi University of Milan
Enrico Zio
Enrico Zio Polytechnic University of Milan
Tao Hu
Tao Hu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Igor Tkachev
Igor Tkachev Russian Academy of Sciences
Wei Wei
Wei Wei University of Technology Sydney
Y. B. Hsiung
Y. B. Hsiung National Taiwan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in diversifying their expertise beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, related online degrees in fields like Speech-Language Pathology can offer unique career opportunities. Understanding the challenges of program admissions is essential, which is why exploring resources such as slp grad school acceptance rate can help prospective students gauge their chances and prepare accordingly.

Choosing the right program that matches your academic background and career goals is crucial. For some, selecting from the easiest speech pathology programs to get into could offer a more accessible entry point into this specialized arena.

Cost is another key consideration when selecting an online degree. Information on speech pathology degree online cost provides insight into budgeting for tuition, fees, and other expenses, helping students plan their education expenditures effectively.

Additionally, for military veterans and active service members, identifying military friendly online speech pathology degree programs can open doors to supportive educational environments that understand their unique needs.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Cammi

Recently Published Articles