World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kshirasagar Naik

Kshirasagar Naik

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
5536
World Ranking
13467
National Ranking
521

Kshirasagar Naik publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kshirasagar Naik sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 232 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kshirasagar Naik D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kshirasagar Naik sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kshirasagar Naik is a researcher primarily affiliated with the University of Waterloo in Canada, with a body of work focused on various aspects of computer science and engineering. Their scholarly production spans multiple domains, notably emphasizing network security, authentication protocols, and advanced detection techniques in communication systems and networks.

The main fields of study for their research include Computer Science and Engineering. More specifically, their work covers several subfields such as Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, and Signal Processing.

The topics addressed in their research involve:

  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • User Authentication and Security Systems

Among the recent papers associated with or closely related to their research domain are:

  • "An Evolutionary SVM Model for DDOS Attack Detection in Software Defined Networks," 2020, IEEE Access
  • "ID-CEPPA: Identity-based Computationally Efficient Privacy-Preserving Authentication scheme for vehicle-to-vehicle communications," 2022, Journal of Systems Architecture
  • "A Secure and Lightweight Protocol for Message Authentication in Wireless Sensor Networks," 2020, IEEE Systems Journal
  • "An evaluation of potential attack surfaces based on attack tree modelling and risk matrix applied to self-sovereign identity," 2022, Computers & Security
  • "Embedded YARA rules: strengthening YARA rules utilising fuzzy hashing and fuzzy rules for malware analysis," 2020, Complex & Intelligent Systems

Frequent co-authors contributing to their research include:

  • Marzia Zaman
  • Abdul Mutakabbir
  • Chung-Horng Lung
  • Richard Purcell
  • Srinivas Sampalli

The recurring venues for publishing their scientific work encompass:

  • Sensors
  • Journal of Systems Architecture
  • Digital Threats Research and Practice
  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Software Testing And Quality Assurance

    Kshirasagar Naik;Priyadarshi Tripathy

  • Data Capacity Improvement of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Non-Uniform Sensor Distribution:

    Jie Lian;Kshirasagar Naik;Gordon B. Agnew

  • Software Testing and Quality Assurance: Theory and Practice

    Kshirasagar Naik;Priyadarshi Tripathy

  • A Survey of Communication Protocols for Automatic Meter Reading Applications

    T Khalifa;K Naik;A Nayak

  • A node-cooperative ARQ scheme for wireless ad hoc networks

    M. Dianati;Xinhua Ling;K. Naik;Xuemin Shen

  • Intersection-Based Geographical Routing Protocol for VANETs: A Proposal and Analysis

    H. Saleet;R. Langar;K. Naik;R. Boutaba

  • Vehicular Networks for a Greener Environment: A Survey

    Maazen Alsabaan;Waleed Alasmary;Abdurhman Albasir;Kshirasagar Naik

  • An Evolutionary SVM Model for DDOS Attack Detection in Software Defined Networks

    Kshira Sagar Sahoo;Bata Krishna Tripathy;Kshirasagar Naik;Somula Ramasubbareddy

  • Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communications

    Pawan Kumar Verma;Rajesh Verma;Arun Prakash;Ashish Agrawal

  • An efficient anonymous communication protocol for peer-to-peer applications over mobile ad-hoc networks

    Chao-Chin Chou;D.S.L. Wei;C.-C.J. Kuo;K. Naik

  • Optimization of Fuel Cost and Emissions Using V2V Communications

    Maazen Alsabaan;Kshirasagar Naik;Tarek Khalifa

  • SGBR: A Routing Protocol for Delay Tolerant Networks Using Social Grouping

    Tamer Abdelkader;Kshirasagar Naik;Amiya Nayak;Nishith Goel

  • DTSG: Dynamic time-stable geocast routing in vehicular ad hoc networks

    Hamidreza Rahbar;Kshirasagar Naik;Amiya Nayak

  • A performance comparison of delay-tolerant network routing protocols

    Tamer Abdelkader;Kshirasagar Naik;Amiya Nayak;Nishith Goel

  • Software implementation strategies for power-conscious systems

    Kshirasagar Naik;David S. L. Wei

  • Exploiting temporal dependency for opportunistic forwarding in urban vehicular networks

    Hongzi Zhu;Shan Chang;Minglu Li;Kshirasagar Naik

  • Energy Cost Models of Smartphones for Task Offloading to the Cloud

    Majid Altamimi;Atef Abdrabou;Kshirasagar Naik;Amiya Nayak

  • Software Evolution and Maintenance: A Practitioner's Approach

    Priyadarshi Tripathy;Kshirasagar Naik

  • Opportunistic fair scheduling for the downlink of IEEE 802.16 wireless metropolitan area networks

    Mehri Mehrjoo;Mehrdad Dianati;Xuemin (Sherman) Shen;Kshirasagar Naik

  • Cooperative Fair Scheduling for the Downlink of CDMA Cellular Networks

    M. Dianati;Xuemin Shen;K. Naik

  • Efficient computation of unique input/output sequences in finite-state machines

    Kshirasagar Naik

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. L. Wei
David S. L. Wei Fordham University
Amiya Nayak
Amiya Nayak University of Ottawa
Xuemin Shen
Xuemin Shen University of Waterloo
Mehrdad Dianati
Mehrdad Dianati Queen's University Belfast
Sy-Yen Kuo
Sy-Yen Kuo National Taiwan University
Lei Chen
Lei Chen Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Pin-Han Ho
Pin-Han Ho University of Waterloo
Basem Shihada
Basem Shihada King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Longzhi Yang
Longzhi Yang Northumbria University
Rahim Tafazolli
Rahim Tafazolli University of Surrey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and promising career pathways. Many students are looking for affordable options, and finding the cheapest data science degree programs can help reduce tuition while building in-demand skills.

For those interested in technical fields, pursuing an electrical engineering degree online admissions can offer flexibility and the potential for high-paying jobs in engineering and technology. Accredited programs allow students to gain practical experience and advanced knowledge without attending campus.

Not everyone needs a full degree to launch their tech career. There are also quick certifications that pay well, making it easier to enter specialized fields or boost your credentials in a shorter time. These certifications can lead to rewarding roles in IT, cybersecurity, and more.

If you’re looking for advanced qualifications quickly, consider one of the shortest master degree programs available online. Completing a master’s degree in less time means you can accelerate your career growth while managing work and life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Kshirasagar Naik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles