World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
3853
World Ranking
10963
National Ranking
1072

Katherine S. Young publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine S. Young sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Katherine S. Young D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine S. Young sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Postnatal depression and its effects on child development: a review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries

    Christine E Parsons;Katherine S Young;Tamsen J Rochat;Morten L Kringelbach

  • Positive and Negative Emotion Regulation in Adolescence: Links to Anxiety and Depression

    Katherine S Young;Christina F Sandman;Michelle G Craske

  • The impact of mindfulness-based interventions on brain activity: A systematic review of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.

    Katherine S. Young;Anne Maj van der Velden;Michelle G. Craske;Karen Johanne Pallesen

  • The Motivational Salience of Infant Faces is Similar for Men and Women.

    Christine E. Parsons;Katherine S. Young;Katherine S. Young;Nina Kumari;Nina Kumari;Alan Stein

  • The functional neuroanatomy of the evolving parent-infant relationship.

    C.E. Parsons;K.S. Young;K.S. Young;L. Murray;A. Stein

  • Development of a social dependency scale.

    Jeanne Q. Benoliel;Ruth McCorkle;Katherine Young

  • Understanding the human parental brain: a critical role of the orbitofrontal cortex.

    Christine E. Parsons;Eloise A. Stark;Katherine S. Young;Alan Stein

  • Introducing the Oxford Vocal (OxVoc) Sounds database: a validated set of non-acted affective sounds from human infants, adults, and domestic animals

    Christine E. Parsons;Katherine S. Young;Michelle G. Craske;Alan L. Stein

  • Risk factors for developing COVID-19: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK)

    Hayley Holt;Mohammad Talaei;Matthew Greenig;Dominik Zenner

  • Comorbidity Between Depression and Anxiety in Adolescents: Bridge Symptoms and Relevance of Risk and Protective Factors

    Deniz Konac;Katherine S Young;Jennifer Lau;Edward D Barker

  • Minor structural abnormalities in the infant face disrupt neural processing: A unique window into early caregiving responses

    Christine E. Parsons;Katherine S. Young;Hamid Mohseni;Mark W. Woolrich

  • How does cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia work? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediators of change.

    Christine E. Parsons;Robert Zachariae;Christoffer Landberger;Katherine S. Young

  • Listening to infant distress vocalizations enhances effortful motor performance

    Christine E Parsons;Christine E Parsons;Katherine S Young;Katherine S Young;Emma Parsons;Emma Parsons;Alan Stein

  • Treatment for social anxiety disorder alters functional connectivity in emotion regulation neural circuitry.

    Katherine S. Young;Lisa J. Burklund;Jared B. Torre;Darby Saxbe

  • The neural basis of responsive caregiving behaviour: Investigating temporal dynamics within the parental brain

    Katherine S. Young;Christine E. Parsons;Alan Stein;Peter Vuust

  • Evidence for a Caregiving Instinct: Rapid Differentiation of Infant from Adult Vocalizations Using Magnetoencephalography

    Katherine S. Young;Christine E. Parsons;Else-Marie Jegindoe Elmholdt;Mark W. Woolrich

  • Duration of motherhood has incremental effects on mothers' neural processing of infant vocal cues: a neuroimaging study of women.

    Christine E. Parsons;Katherine S. Young;Mikkel V. Petersen;Else-Marie Jegindoe Elmholdt

  • Positive and negative emotion regulation in adolescence: links to anxiety and depression

    Unknown

  • Sleep quality is associated with emotion experience and adaptive regulation of positive emotion: An experience sampling study

    Unknown

  • The bonnie baby : Experimentally manipulated temperament affects perceived cuteness and motivation to view infant faces

    Christine E. Parsons;Christine E. Parsons;Katherine S. Young;Katherine S. Young;Ritu Bhandari;Marinus H. van Ijzendoorn

Frequent Co-Authors

Morten L. Kringelbach
Morten L. Kringelbach University of Oxford
Michelle G. Craske
Michelle G. Craske University of California, Los Angeles
Alan Stein
Alan Stein University of Oxford
Gerome Breen
Gerome Breen King's College London
Richard E. Zinbarg
Richard E. Zinbarg Northwestern University
Robin Nusslock
Robin Nusslock Northwestern University
Susan Y. Bookheimer
Susan Y. Bookheimer University of California, Los Angeles
Thalia C. Eley
Thalia C. Eley King's College London
Matthew D. Lieberman
Matthew D. Lieberman University of California, Los Angeles
Peter Vuust
Peter Vuust Royal Academy of Music

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Katherine S. Young

Recently Published Articles