World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
76
Citations
31826
World Ranking
977
National Ranking
366

John R. Sauer publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Sauer sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 277 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

John R. Sauer D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Sauer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

John R. Sauer is affiliated with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on several interconnected subfields including Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Economics and Econometrics, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, particularly within Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Economic and Environmental Valuation, Genetic and Phenotypic Traits in Livestock, Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference, and Avian Ecology and Behavior.

John R. Sauer has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed publications. Notable recent papers include:

  • American Woodcock Singing-Ground Survey: Comparison of Four Models for Trend in Population Size, 2021, Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
  • Model selection for the North American Breeding Bird Survey, 2020, Ecological Applications
  • Modeled distribution shifts of North American birds over four decades based on suitable climate alone do not predict observed shifts, 2022, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Estimating allowable take for an increasing bald eagle population in the United States, 2022, Journal of Wildlife Management
  • Assessing the efficacy of protected and multiple-use lands for bird conservation in the U.S., 2020, PLoS ONE

Frequent co-authors in their research include William A. Link, Qiongyu Huang, Brooke L. Bateman, Nicole L. Michel, and Anna M. Pidgeon.

John R. Sauer has published in a variety of scientific journals, with contributions appearing in:

  • Ecological Applications
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Journal of Wildlife Management
  • Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
  • PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines

    Stuart H.M. Butchart;Stuart H.M. Butchart;Matt Walpole;Ben Collen;Arco Van Strien

  • Decline of the North American avifauna

    Kenneth V. Rosenberg;Kenneth V. Rosenberg;Adriaan M. Dokter;Peter J. Blancher;John R. Sauer

  • Population declines in North American birds that migrate to the neotropics.

    Chandler S. Robbins;John R. Sauer;Russell S. Greenberg;Sam Droege

  • Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis

    Kenneth H. Pollock;James D. Nichols;Theodore R. Simons;George L. Farnsworth

  • A DOUBLE-OBSERVER APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITY AND ABUNDANCE FROM POINT COUNTS

    James D. Nichols;James E. Hines;John R. Sauer;Frederick W. Fallon

  • ESTIMATING SPECIES RICHNESS: THE IMPORTANCE OF HETEROGENEITY IN SPECIES DETECTABILITY

    Thierry Boulinier;James D. Nichols;John R. Sauer;James E. Hines

  • Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts

    David G. Krementz;C. J. Ralph;J. R. Sauer;S. Droege

  • Observer differences in the North American Breeding Bird Survey

    John R. Sauer;Bruce G. Peterjohn;William A. Link

  • A REMOVAL MODEL FOR ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITIES FROM POINT-COUNT SURVEYS

    George L. Farnsworth;Kenneth H. Pollock;James D. Nichols;Theodore R. Simons

  • Effects of Landscape Composition and Wetland Fragmentation on Frog and Toad Abundance and Species Richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, U.S.A.

    Melinda G. Knutson;John R. Sauer;Douglas A. Olsen;Michael J. Mossman

  • The North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and analysis 1966 - 2015

    John Sauer;Daniel Niven;James Hines;David Ziolkowski

  • Managing and Monitoring Birds Using Point Counts: Standards and Applications

    C. John Ralph;Sam Droege;John R. Sauer

  • Population status of North American grassland birds from the North American Breeding Bird Survey

    B. Peterjohn;J.R. Sauer

  • Generalized procedures for testing hypotheses about survival or recovery rates

    John R. Sauer;Byron K. Williams

  • Program CONTRAST: a general program for the analysis of several survival or recovery rate estimates

    James E. Hines;John R. Sauer

  • Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts

    C. John Ralph;John R. Sauer;Sam Droege

  • Using Landscape Ecology to Test Hypotheses About Large‐Scale Abundance Patterns in Migratory Birds

    Curtis H. Flather;John R. Sauer

  • The North American Breeding Bird Survey 1966–2011: Summary Analysis and Species Accounts

    John R. Sauer;William A. Link;Jane E. Fallon;Keith L. Pardieck

  • ESTIMATING POPULATION CHANGE FROM COUNT DATA: APPLICATION TO THE NORTH AMERICAN BREEDING BIRD SURVEY

    William A. Link;John R. Sauer

  • Analysis of the North American Breeding Bird Survey Using Hierarchical Models

    John R. Sauer;John R. Sauer;William A. Link

  • Forest fragmentation and bird community dynamics: inference at regional scales

    Thierry Boulinier;Thierry Boulinier;Thierry Boulinier;James D. Nichols;James E. Hines;John R. Sauer

  • Consistent response of bird populations to climate change on two continents

    Philip A. Stephens;Lucy R. Mason;Rhys E. Green;Rhys E. Green;Richard D. Gregory

  • A HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS OF POPULATION CHANGE WITH APPLICATION TO CERULEAN WARBLERS

    William A. Link;John R. Sauer

  • Estimating Site Occupancy and Detection Probability Parameters for Meso‐ And Large Mammals in a Coastal Ecosystem

    Allan F. O'connell;Neil W. Talancy;Larissa L. Bailey;John R. Sauer

Frequent Co-Authors

William A. Link
William A. Link United States Geological Survey
James D. Nichols
James D. Nichols United States Geological Survey
James E. Hines
James E. Hines United States Geological Survey
Kenneth H. Pollock
Kenneth H. Pollock North Carolina State University
Thierry Boulinier
Thierry Boulinier University of Montpellier
J. Andrew Royle
J. Andrew Royle United States Geological Survey
William L. Kendall
William L. Kendall United States Geological Survey
Emmanuelle Cam
Emmanuelle Cam University of Western Brittany
Curtis H. Flather
Curtis H. Flather US Forest Service
Grey W. Pendleton
Grey W. Pendleton Alaska Department of Fish and Game

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution often intersects with related fields such as psychology and counseling, opening diverse career opportunities. If you're interested in human behavior and want to expand your expertise, consider pursuing a master psychologie à distance. This flexible online degree helps you build essential skills for research, teaching, or environmental education.

Professionals focused on helping others may find the fastest online counseling degree particularly appealing, as it can lead to credentials for school or community counseling roles. There’s also growing demand for expertise in areas like forensic psychology—explore some of the highest paying forensic psychology jobs to see how analytical and investigative skills can contribute to both environmental and societal well-being.

For those passionate about supporting younger generations, a focus on childhood development through child psychology degrees online provides practical pathways for careers in education, policy, or advocacy. These online degrees offer flexibility, affordability, and the chance to tailor your academic journey toward your passions within or beyond the environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing John R. Sauer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles