| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental Sciences | 60 | 2929 | 231 | 149 | 13085 |
The chart shows the history of publications by John Proctor between 1966 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Proctor published across 60 years, from 1966 to 2025, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 1997. 3 of the 157 publications appeared in the last two years.
157 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1966 | 1 |
| 1967 | 0 |
| 1968 | 0 |
| 1969 | 0 |
| 1970 | 1 |
| 1971 | 4 |
| 1972 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0 |
| 1975 | 1 |
| 1976 | 2 |
| 1977 | 3 |
| 1978 | 1 |
| 1979 | 1 |
| 1980 | 2 |
| 1981 | 2 |
| 1982 | 1 |
| 1983 | 8 |
| 1984 | 7 |
| 1985 | 1 |
| 1986 | 6 |
| 1987 | 8 |
| 1988 | 5 |
| 1989 | 6 |
| 1990 | 7 |
| 1991 | 5 |
| 1992 | 8 |
| 1993 | 2 |
| 1994 | 7 |
| 1995 | 2 |
| 1996 | 6 |
| 1997 | 9 |
| 1998 | 5 |
| 1999 | 6 |
| 2000 | 6 |
| 2001 | 4 |
| 2002 | 3 |
| 2003 | 5 |
| 2004 | 3 |
| 2005 | 4 |
| 2006 | 0 |
| 2007 | 8 |
| 2008 | 0 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2010 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 1 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | 3 |
| Total | 157 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Proctor sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 149 publications — 41st percentile
41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 41–50 | 21 | |
| 51–60 | 62 | |
| 61–70 | 133 | |
| 71–80 | 257 | |
| 81–90 | 361 | |
| 91–100 | 440 | |
| 101–110 | 492 | |
| 111–120 | 541 | |
| 121–130 | 617 | |
| 131–140 | 544 | |
| 141–150 | 541 | 149 |
| 151–160 | 539 | |
| 161–170 | 444 | |
| 171–180 | 444 | |
| 181–190 | 400 | |
| 191–200 | 377 | |
| 201–210 | 318 | |
| 211–220 | 282 | |
| 221–230 | 263 | |
| 231–240 | 220 | |
| 241–250 | 217 | |
| 251–260 | 180 | |
| 261–270 | 181 | |
| 271–280 | 155 | |
| 281–290 | 130 | |
| 291–300 | 127 | |
| 301–310 | 130 | |
| 311–320 | 85 | |
| 321–330 | 106 | |
| 331–340 | 80 | |
| 341–350 | 83 | |
| 351–360 | 75 | |
| 361–370 | 69 | |
| 371–380 | 52 | |
| 381–390 | 54 | |
| 391–400 | 56 | |
| 401–410 | 44 | |
| 411–420 | 40 | |
| 421–430 | 36 | |
| 431–440 | 25 | |
| 441–450 | 25 | |
| 451–460 | 32 | |
| 461–470 | 29 | |
| 471–480 | 21 | |
| 481–490 | 26 | |
| 491–500 | 26 | |
| 501–510 | 17 | |
| 511–520 | 19 | |
| 521–530 | 15 | |
| 531–540 | 22 | |
| 541–550 | 12 | |
| 551–560 | 15 | |
| 561–570 | 11 | |
| 571–580 | 19 | |
| 581–590 | 9 | |
| 591–600 | 9 | |
| 601–610 | 7 | |
| 611–620 | 11 | |
| 621–630 | 5 | |
| 631–640 | 5 | |
| 641–650 | 6 | |
| 651–660 | 3 | |
| 661–670 | 3 | |
| 671–680 | 4 | |
| 681–689 | 4 | |
| 690+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Proctor sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile
71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 12 | |
| 31 | 26 | |
| 32 | 51 | |
| 33 | 88 | |
| 34 | 123 | |
| 35 | 163 | |
| 36 | 206 | |
| 37 | 267 | |
| 38 | 265 | |
| 39 | 275 | |
| 40 | 321 | |
| 41 | 343 | |
| 42 | 305 | |
| 43 | 336 | |
| 44 | 330 | |
| 45 | 348 | |
| 46 | 291 | |
| 47 | 275 | |
| 48 | 272 | |
| 49 | 273 | |
| 50 | 263 | |
| 51 | 232 | |
| 52 | 266 | |
| 53 | 217 | |
| 54 | 198 | |
| 55 | 177 | |
| 56 | 202 | |
| 57 | 204 | |
| 58 | 166 | |
| 59 | 177 | |
| 60 | 166 | 60 |
| 61 | 152 | |
| 62 | 143 | |
| 63 | 150 | |
| 64 | 124 | |
| 65 | 119 | |
| 66 | 120 | |
| 67 | 118 | |
| 68 | 82 | |
| 69 | 98 | |
| 70 | 94 | |
| 71 | 105 | |
| 72 | 74 | |
| 73 | 84 | |
| 74 | 70 | |
| 75 | 67 | |
| 76 | 78 | |
| 77 | 60 | |
| 78 | 59 | |
| 79 | 52 | |
| 80 | 47 | |
| 81 | 38 | |
| 82 | 48 | |
| 83 | 42 | |
| 84 | 42 | |
| 85 | 43 | |
| 86 | 29 | |
| 87 | 37 | |
| 88 | 29 | |
| 89 | 30 | |
| 90 | 34 | |
| 91 | 20 | |
| 92 | 22 | |
| 93 | 17 | |
| 94 | 19 | |
| 95 | 24 | |
| 96 | 21 | |
| 97 | 20 | |
| 98 | 24 | |
| 99 | 17 | |
| 100 | 17 | |
| 101 | 21 | |
| 102 | 25 | |
| 103 | 18 | |
| 104 | 26 | |
| 105 | 20 | |
| 106 | 15 | |
| 107 | 10 | |
| 108 | 13 | |
| 109 | 15 | |
| 110 | 12 | |
| 111 | 8 | |
| 112 | 7 | |
| 113 | 9 | |
| 114 | 6 | |
| 115 | 12 | |
| 116 | 7 | |
| 117 | 8 | |
| 118 | 3 | |
| 119 | 5 | |
| 120 | 7 | |
| 121 | 2 | |
| 122 | 4 | |
| 123 | 8 | |
| 124 | 7 | |
| 125 | 9 | |
| 126+ | 92 |
John Proctor was affiliated with the University of Stirling in the United Kingdom. Their research spanned multiple areas within biological and environmental sciences, with particular attention to genetics, aging, and plant science.
They contributed to the following recent papers:
The scientist had frequent co-authors including:
Common publication venues for their work were:
John Proctor's research areas included the following subfields:
The main topics addressed in their work covered:
John Proctor;Stanley R.J. Woodell
S. R. J. Woodell;A. J. M. Baker;J. Proctor;R. D. Reeves
L. A. Bruijnzeel;J. Proctor
John Proctor
Unknown
J. Proctor;H. Lieth;M. J. A. Werger
R. H. Marrs;J. Proctor;A. Heaney;M. D. Mountford
John Proctor
Petra S. Kidd;John Proctor
Unknown
Francis Q Brearley;Francis Q Brearley;Sukaesih Prajadinata;Petra S Kidd;John Proctor
J. Proctor;B. A. Roberts
Unknown
Maristerra R. Lemes;Maristerra R. Lemes;Rogério Gribel;John Proctor;Dario Grattapaglia;Dario Grattapaglia
John Proctor
Francis Q. Brearley;John Proctor;Laszlo Nagy;Gemma Dalrymple
D.A. Scott;J. Proctor;J. Thompson
B. A. Roberts;J. Proctor
John Proctor
A. J. M. Baker;J. Proctor
J. J. Green;L. A. Dawson;J. Proctor;E. I. Duff
J. Thompson;J. Proctor;V. Viana;W. Milliken
D. Mc C. Newbery;E. J. F. Campbell;J. Proctor;M. J. Still
J. Proctor;C. F. Jordan
Unknown
R. H. Marrs;J. Proctor
P. A. Stott;P. A. Furley;J. Proctor;J. A. Ratter
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA often leads students to consider diverse academic routes and career options. For those interested in expanding their skill set in social work fields linked to environmental advocacy, enrolling in accredited dsw online programs can be a strategic choice. These programs provide expertise in policy and community engagement, vital for sustainable development roles.
If flexibility and affordability are priorities, pursuing one of the cheapest online general studies degree programs offers a broad foundation that can be tailored with environmental science electives. This approach suits students seeking interdisciplinary knowledge without committing to specialized degrees immediately.
For learners seeking quicker completions, identifying the easiest degree to get related to environmental fields can help reduce time to graduation while maintaining relevant competencies. However, balancing ease of study with career goals is essential for long-term success.
Specialized careers such as geology, which play a crucial role in environmental assessment and management, can be pursued through top-ranked geologist degree online programs. These options combine field expertise with modern technology, preparing students for dynamic work environments.