World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
10727
World Ranking
5091
National Ranking
422

John N. Whitaker publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John N. Whitaker sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 239 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John N. Whitaker D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John N. Whitaker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John N. Whitaker was affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom during their career. Their professional work was centered within academic research, focusing on advancing knowledge through various scientific inquiries.

Throughout their career, there were no recorded publications specifically listed by title, year, or venue in the data provided. Additionally, there is no available information regarding frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications attributed to this scientist.

The data does not detail the main fields or subfields of study associated with their research, nor does it specify particular topics of work that were a focus of their academic contributions.

No awards or recognitions have been documented for John N. Whitaker. Information confirming that the scientist is deceased is noted, and the writing reflects this accordingly.

Best Publications

  • Myelin antigen-specific CD8+ T cells are encephalitogenic and produce severe disease in C57BL/6 mice.

    Deming Sun;John N. Whitaker;Zhigang Huang;Di Liu

  • Myelin basic protein-specific T lymphocyte lines from MS patients and healthy individuals.

    M. Pette;K. Fujita;B. Kitze;J. N. Whitaker

  • Neuropathological changes in scrapie and Alzheimer's disease are associated with increased expression of apolipoprotein E and cathepsin D in astrocytes.

    J. F. Diedrich;H. Minnigan;R. I. Carp;J. N. Whitaker

  • A newly recognized congenital myasthenic syndrome attributed to a prolonged open time of the acetylcholine-induced ion channel.

    Andrew G. Engel;Edward H. Lambert;Donald M. Mulder;Carlos F. Torres

  • Myelin encephalitogenic protein fragments in cerebrospinal fluid of persons with multiple sclerosis

    John N. Whitaker

  • Polyneuropathy and IgM monoclonal gammopathy: Studies on the pathogenetic role of anti‐myelin‐associated glycoprotein antibody

    J R Mendell;Z Sahenk;J N Whitaker;B D Trapp

  • Management of patients receiving interferon beta-1b for multiple sclerosis: report of a consensus conference.

    F. D. Lublin;J. N. Whitaker;B. H. Eidelman;A. E. Miller

  • Immunoreactive myelin basic protein in the cerebrospinal fluid in neurological disorders

    John N. Whitaker;Robert P. Lisak;Rifaat M. Bashir;Olive H. Fitch

  • Circulating Demyelinating Factors in Acute Idiopathic Polyneuropathy

    Stuart D. Cook;Peter C. Dowling;Margaret R. Murray;John N. Whitaker

  • Immunocytochemical localization of the sodium, potassium activated ATPase in knifefish brain.

    John G. Wood;Dou H. Jean;John N. Whitaker;Barbara J. McLaughlin

  • Linomide in relapsing and secondary progressive MS Part II: MRI results

    Jerry S. Wolinsky;Ponnada A Narayana;J. H. Noseworthy;F. D. Lublin

  • Preparation of a monoclonal antibody to citrullinated epitopes: its characterization and some applications to immunohistochemistry in human brain.

    Anthony P. Nicholas;John N. Whitaker

  • Landry-Guillain-Barré syndrome. A primary demyelinating disease.

    Henryk Wiśniewski;Robert D. Terry;John N. Whitaker;Stuart D. Cook

  • Inflammatory myopathy: a review of etiologic and pathogenetic factors.

    John N. Whitaker

  • The Sequential Limited Degradation of Bovine Myelin Basic Protein by Bovine Brain Cathepsin D

    John N. Whitaker;Jerome M. Seyer

  • Rapid release and unusual stability of immunodominant peptide 45-89 from citrullinated myelin basic protein.

    Ligong Cao;R. Goodin;D. Wood;M. A. Moscarello

  • Evaluation of multiple sclerosis by 1H spectroscopic imaging at 4.1 T

    Jullie W. Pan;Hoby P. Hetherington;J. T Vaughan;Galen Mitchell

  • Enhanced T cell responsiveness to citrulline-containing myelin basic protein in multiple sclerosis patients:

    Laura R Tranquill;Ligong Cao;Nicholas C Ling;Hubert Kalbacher

  • Identification and characterization of gangliosides reacting with IgM paraproteins in three patients with neuropathy associated with biclonal gammopathy.

    Amjad A. Ilyas;Hugh J. Willison;Marinos C. Dalakas;John N. Whitaker

  • Cerebrospinal fluid in acute optic neuritis: Experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial

    La Rolak;RW Beck;DW Paty;WW Tourtellotte

  • Clinical and laboratory features of primary progressive and secondary progressive MS.

    Khurram Bashir;John N. Whitaker

  • The protein antigens of peripheral nerve myelin

    John N. Whitaker

  • Plasma exchange and prednisone in Guillain-Barré syndrome: a controlled randomized trial.

    J. R. Mendell;J. T. Kissel;M. S. Kennedy;Z. Sahenk

Frequent Co-Authors

Jerome M. Seyer
Jerome M. Seyer University of Tennessee Health Science Center
J. Edwin Blalock
J. Edwin Blalock University of Alabama at Birmingham
Jerry R. Mendell
Jerry R. Mendell The Ohio State University
Etty N. Benveniste
Etty N. Benveniste University of Alabama at Birmingham
Mario A. Moscarello
Mario A. Moscarello University of Toronto
Darcy B. Wilson
Darcy B. Wilson Torrey Pines Institute For Molecular Studies
Marion Kirk
Marion Kirk University of Alabama at Birmingham
Warren Strober
Warren Strober National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Robert P. Lisak
Robert P. Lisak Wayne State University
Anthony T. Reder
Anthony T. Reder University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in neuroscience, a variety of psychology degree online options offer foundational knowledge in brain science and behavioral health. These programs can prepare students for advanced studies or immediate careers in research, mental health, or counseling.

If you're seeking hands-on roles in social work, consider exploring 1 year msw programs online no bsw. These accelerated programs are suitable for career-changers or those with bachelor’s degrees in other fields who wish to enter clinical or advocacy roles quickly.

For those interested in advanced practice and clinical leadership, an online psyd program can be a strategic next step. These doctorate-level degrees prepare graduates for high-level positions in clinical psychology, assessment, and therapy, often integrating neuroscience research and application.

Lastly, aspiring marriage and family therapists should look into mft accredited programs. These specialized online degrees focus on relational and systemic therapy approaches, linking neuroscience concepts with practical counseling skills.

Each pathway opens diverse career options, letting you tailor your education to your interests in the broader neuroscience and mental health fields.

Best Scientists Citing John N. Whitaker

Recently Published Articles