D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 38 Citations 7,265 91 World Ranking 2401 National Ranking 1234

Research.com Recognitions

Awards & Achievements

1999 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

1993 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

1987 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Quantum mechanics
  • Epistemology
  • General relativity

His primary scientific interests are in Epistemology, Theoretical physics, Philosophy of science, Classical mechanics and Scientific theory. His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Hole argument and Epistemology. His research integrates issues of Exorcist, Mathematical economics, Maxwell's demon and Demon in his study of Theoretical physics.

His work in Philosophy of science covers topics such as Scientific law which are related to areas like Objectivity, Physical law, Modern physics, Subject and Symmetry. His Classical mechanics research integrates issues from Observer and Proper length. His Scientific theory research incorporates elements of Ontology and Statement.

His most cited work include:

  • The cement of the universe (626 citations)
  • Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory (501 citations)
  • A Primer on Determinism (466 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Epistemology, Theoretical physics, Theory of relativity, Classical mechanics and Philosophy of science. Contemporary philosophy, Argument, Analytic philosophy, Metaphysics and Natural law are the core of his Epistemology study. His Theoretical physics study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Determinism, Problem of time, Spacetime and Quantum field theory.

His Theory of relativity research is multidisciplinary, relying on both General relativity and Mathematical physics. John Earman interconnects Stationary spacetime and Background independence in the investigation of issues within Classical mechanics. His work on Test theories of special relativity as part of general Four-force research is often related to Higher-dimensional Einstein gravity, thus linking different fields of science.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Epistemology (36.71%)
  • Theoretical physics (29.75%)
  • Theory of relativity (12.66%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2002-2020)?

  • Theoretical physics (29.75%)
  • Epistemology (36.71%)
  • Quantum field theory (8.23%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Theoretical physics, Epistemology, Quantum field theory, Philosophy of science and Quantum are his primary areas of study. His Theoretical physics research incorporates themes from Determinism, Quantum mechanics, Classical physics and Quantum gravity. His work on Epistemology is being expanded to include thematically relevant topics such as Spacetime.

His research investigates the link between Quantum field theory and topics such as Gauge theory that cross with problems in Center. His research in Philosophy of science intersects with topics in Symmetry, Subject, Engineering ethics and Engineering physics. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Pure mathematics and Superluminal motion.

Between 2002 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • The “Past Hypothesis”: Not even false (106 citations)
  • Laws, Symmetry, and Symmetry Breaking: Invariance, Conservation Principles, and Objectivity (93 citations)
  • Curie's Principle and spontaneous symmetry breaking (89 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Quantum mechanics
  • Epistemology
  • General relativity

John Earman focuses on Theoretical physics, Epistemology, Quantum field theory, Mathematical economics and Modern physics. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including De Sitter universe and Constant. John Earman focuses mostly in the field of Epistemology, narrowing it down to topics relating to Spacetime and, in certain cases, Cheating.

His Quantum field theory research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Observer, Unruh effect, Uniqueness and Non uniqueness. His research integrates issues of General relativity, Measurement problem, Von Neumann architecture and Superselection in his study of Mathematical economics. The various areas that John Earman examines in his Modern physics study include Symmetry, Scientific law, Determinism, Hard determinism and Physical law.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

The cement of the universe

John Earman;J. L. Mackie.
(1974)

992 Citations

Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory

David Christensen;John Earman.
The Philosophical Review (1994)

786 Citations

A Primer on Determinism

John Earman.
(1986)

752 Citations

What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Story

John Earman;John Norton.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (1987)

497 Citations

Bayes or bust

John Earman.
(1992)

395 Citations

World enough and space-time : absolute versus relational theories of space and time

John Earman.
The Philosophical Review (1992)

349 Citations

An introduction to the philosophy of time and space

John Earman;Bas C. van Fraassen.
(1970)

309 Citations

Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes

John Earman.
(1995)

275 Citations

Ceteris Paribus, there is No problem of provisos

John Earman;John T. Roberts.
Synthese (1999)

219 Citations

Hume's Abject Failure

John Earman.
(2000)

181 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing John Earman

Elliott Sober

Elliott Sober

University of Wisconsin–Madison

Publications: 21

Daniel N. Osherson

Daniel N. Osherson

Princeton University

Publications: 19

Mike Oaksford

Mike Oaksford

Birkbeck, University of London

Publications: 18

Nick Chater

Nick Chater

University of Warwick

Publications: 15

Marcus Hutter

Marcus Hutter

DeepMind (United Kingdom)

Publications: 14

Ulrike Hahn

Ulrike Hahn

Birkbeck, University of London

Publications: 12

Bas C. van Fraassen

Bas C. van Fraassen

San Francisco State University

Publications: 9

Michael Ruse

Michael Ruse

Florida State University

Publications: 8

Nancy Cartwright

Nancy Cartwright

Durham University

Publications: 7

Denis J. Hilton

Denis J. Hilton

Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées

Publications: 7

James Woodward

James Woodward

University of Pittsburgh

Publications: 6

Trending Scientists

Michael Waidner

Michael Waidner

Technical University of Darmstadt

Tilmann Gneiting

Tilmann Gneiting

Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies

Ali Mostafazadeh

Ali Mostafazadeh

Koç University

Mingui Sun

Mingui Sun

University of Pittsburgh

Perla B. Balbuena

Perla B. Balbuena

Texas A&M University

Takehiko Shimanouchi

Takehiko Shimanouchi

University of Tokyo

Koji Kano

Koji Kano

Doshisha University

Georges Lognay

Georges Lognay

Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech

David C. Spray

David C. Spray

Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Joseph W. Sanger

Joseph W. Sanger

University of Pennsylvania

Sven Petersen

Sven Petersen

GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel

Susan S. Hubbard

Susan S. Hubbard

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Paul Delfabbro

Paul Delfabbro

University of Adelaide

Gillian M. Keating

Gillian M. Keating

Springer Publishing Company (United States)

Robert E. Mrak

Robert E. Mrak

University of Toledo

Francisco S. N. Lobo

Francisco S. N. Lobo

University of Lisbon

Something went wrong. Please try again later.