World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
9315
World Ranking
5137
National Ranking
155

Johannes C. Stoof publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes C. Stoof sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 147 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Johannes C. Stoof D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes C. Stoof sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Johannes C. Stoof is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. The scientist's career centers on research activities conducted within this academic institution, contributing to its scholarly environment.

There is no available data on recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, main research topics, or awards associated with Johannes C. Stoof. Consequently, a detailed overview of specific scientific contributions, collaborative networks, or thematic specializations cannot be provided at this time.

Despite the limited public information on publications or research areas, the affiliation with a university indicates engagement in academic research or teaching activities consistent with careers in higher education and scientific investigation.

No information is present to suggest a deceased status, so this profile refers to Johannes C. Stoof in the present tense, maintaining gender-neutral language throughout.

Best Publications

  • [123I]FP-CIT SPECT shows a pronounced decline of striatal dopamine transporter labelling in early and advanced Parkinson's disease.

    J. Booij;G. Tissingh;G. J. Boer;J. D. Speelman

  • Subclinical dopaminergic dysfunction in asymptomatic Parkinson's disease patients' relatives with a decreased sense of smell

    Henk W. Berendse;Jan Booij;Chantal M. J. E. Francot;Paul L. M. Bergmans

  • Loss of olfaction in de novo and treated Parkinson's disease: possible implications for early diagnosis.

    G. Tissingh;H.W. Berendse;P. Bergmans;R DeWaard

  • Regulation of the activity of striatal cholinergic neurons by dopamine.

    J.C. Stoof;B. Drukarch;P. De Boer;B.H.C. Westerink

  • Imaging of Dopamine Transporters with Iodine-123-FP-CIT SPECT in Healthy Controls and Patients with Parkinson's Disease

    J. Booij;J. B. A. Habraken;P. Bergmans;G. Tissingh

  • Drug-naive patients with Parkinson's disease in Hoehn and Yahr stages I and II show a bilateral decrease in striatal dopamine transporters as revealed by [123I]beta-CIT SPECT

    G. Tissingh;P. Bergmans;J. Booij;A. Winogrodzka

  • Iodine-123-N-omega-fluoropropyl-2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-(4-iod ophenyl)tropane SPECT in healthy controls and early-stage, drug-naive Parkinson's disease

    G. Tissingh;J. Booij;P. Bergmans;A. Winogrodzka

  • Stimulation of D2-dopamine receptors in rat neostriatum inhibits the release of acetylcholine and dopamine but does not affect the release of γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamate or serotonin

    Johannes C. Stoof;Thijs De Boer;Peter Sminia;Arie H. Mulder

  • Astrocyte-mediated enhancement of neuronal survival is abolished by glutathione deficiency

    B Drukarch;E Schepens;C.A.M Jongenelen;J.C Stoof

  • 9-Amino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroacridine (THA), an alleged drug for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, inhibits acetylcholinesterase activity and slow outward K+ current.

    B Drukarch;K S Kits;E G Van der Meer;J C Lodder

  • Practical benefit of [123I]FP-CIT SPET in the demonstration of the dopaminergic deficit in Parkinson's disease.

    J. Booij;G. Tissingh;A. Winogrodzka;G. J. Boer

  • [(123)I]beta-CIT SPECT is a useful method for monitoring dopaminergic degeneration in early stage Parkinson's disease.

    A Winogrodzka;P Bergmans;J Booij;E A van Royen

  • Cultured rat striatal and cortical astrocytes protect mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons against hydrogen peroxide toxicity independent of their effect on neuronal development

    Cornelis H. Langeveld;Cornelis A.M. Jongenelen;Eric Schepens;Johannes C. Stoof

  • The anti-parkinsonian drug amantadine inhibits the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid-evoked release of acetylcholine from rat neostriatum in a non-competitive way

    Johannes C. Stoof;Jan Booij;Benjamin Drukarch;Eric Ch. Wolters

  • Astrocyte-enhanced neuronal survival is mediated by scavenging of extracellular reactive oxygen species.

    Unknown

  • Preclinical (premotor) Parkinson's disease.

    E C Wolters;C Francot;P Bergmans;A Winogrodzka

  • GABA modulates the release of dopamine and acetylcholine from rat caudate nucleus slices.

    Johannes C. Stoof;Egbert J.S. Den Breejen;Arie H. Mulder

  • The effect of intrastriatal application of directly and indirectly acting dopamine agonists and antagonists on the in vivo release of acetylcholine measured by brain microdialysis. The importance of the post-surgery interval.

    P. De Boer;G. Damsma;Q. Schram;J. C. Stoof

  • D-2 receptor stimulation inhibits cyclic AMP formation brought about by D-1 receptor stimulation in rat neostriatum but not nucleus accumbens.

    Johannes C. Stoof;Piet F.H.M. Verheijden

  • Stimulation of D-2 dopamine receptors decreases the evoked in vitro release of [3H]acetylcholine from rat neostriatum: role of K+ and Ca2+.

    B. Drukarch;E. Schepens;A. N. M. Schoffelmeer;J. C. Stoof

  • D-2 dopamine-receptors regulate the release of [3H]dopamine in rat cortical regions showing dopamine immunoreactive fibers

    J.F. Plantje;H.W.M. Steinbusch;J. Schipper;F.A. Dijcks

  • The effects of SCH 23390, YM 09151-2, (+)- and (-)-3-PPP and some classical neuroleptics on D-1 and D-2 receptors in rat neostriatum in vitro.

    Johan F. Plantjé;Håkon A. Hansen;Franz J. Daus;Johannes C. Stoof

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Booij
Jan Booij University of Amsterdam
Anton N. M. Schoffelmeer
Anton N. M. Schoffelmeer VU University Medical Center
Alexander R. Cools
Alexander R. Cools Radboud University
Josée E. Leysen
Josée E. Leysen VU University Medical Center
Pieter Voorn
Pieter Voorn VU University Medical Center
Aalt Bast
Aalt Bast Maastricht University
Liesbeth Reneman
Liesbeth Reneman University of Amsterdam
Ole Petter Ottersen
Ole Petter Ottersen University of Oslo
Huibert D. Mansvelder
Huibert D. Mansvelder Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Henk J. Groenewegen
Henk J. Groenewegen Amsterdam UMC

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in neuroscience? There are several related online degrees that can help expand your career options in mental health, research, and counseling. Many professionals consider pursuing an accelerated masters in social work to quickly build skills for roles in clinical and community settings.

Those drawn to the science of behavior and mental processes can also explore colleges with accelerated psychology programs. These flexible programs make it easier to balance studies with work or other commitments.

Counseling is another popular pathway. It’s important to choose programs that meet professional standards, like those that are cacrep accredited. Accreditation ensures quality and eligibility for licensure.

For those looking to make a difference in clinical settings, consider studying through online clinical mental health counseling programs. These degrees are affordable, accessible, and prepare you for licensure and practice in diverse settings.

Best Scientists Citing Johannes C. Stoof

Recently Published Articles