World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 52 1076 991 20 19 245 8671

Joël Rech publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joël Rech between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joël Rech published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2013. 17 of the 269 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2013. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 8 publications
1996 2025

269 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joël Rech: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 3
2004 4
2005 7
2006 4
2007 15
2008 18
2009 14
2010 12
2011 17
2012 10
2013 20
2014 12
2015 11
2016 15
2017 14
2018 15
2019 9
2020 14
2021 12
2022 13
2023 10
2024 9
2025 8
Total 269
Download as CSV

Joël Rech publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joël Rech sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 237–246 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 245 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92 245
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Joël Rech D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joël Rech sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50 52
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Joël Rech is affiliated with the École Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Saint-Étienne in France. Their research primarily spans the field of Engineering, with a particularly strong focus on Mechanical Engineering and related subfields including Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, and Mechanics of Materials.

Their scholarly output concentrates on topics such as advanced machining processes and optimization, advanced surface polishing techniques, metal alloys wear and properties, additive manufacturing materials and processes, surface treatment and residual stress, and tunneling and rock mechanics.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Procedia CIRP
  • CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology
  • CIRP Annals
  • Journal of Manufacturing Processes
  • Precision Engineering

Coauthors who have recurrently collaborated with Joël Rech comprise:

  • Frédéric Valiorgue
  • Sangil Han
  • Ferdinando Salvatore
  • C. Courbon
  • Mathieu Girinon

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on manufacturing processes and finishing techniques, particularly relating to abrasive flow machining and additive manufacturing methods. Selected recent publications include:

  • "Abrasive flow machining (AFM) finishing of conformal cooling channels created by selective laser melting (SLM)" (2020, Precision Engineering)
  • "Design-dependent shrinkage compensation modeling and mechanical property targeting of metal FFF" (2020, Progress in Additive Manufacturing)
  • "Broaching: Cutting tools and machine tools for manufacturing high quality features in components" (2020, CIRP Annals)
  • "Effect of abrasive flow machining (AFM) finish of selective laser melting (SLM) internal channels on fatigue performance" (2020, Journal of Manufacturing Processes)
  • "Surface integrity in abrasive flow machining (AFM) of internal channels created by selective laser melting (SLM) in different building directions" (2020, Procedia CIRP)

Their research integrates experimental and modeling approaches aimed at improving surface integrity and mechanical properties of components manufactured through advanced additive manufacturing and machining techniques. Their interests include optimizing finishing processes such as abrasive flow machining, as well as targeting mechanical property enhancements through precise control of manufacturing parameters.

Best Publications

  • Cryogenic manufacturing processes

    I. S. Jawahir;H. Attia;D. Biermann;J. Duflou

  • Surface integrity in finish hard turning of case-hardened steels

    J. Rech;A. Moisan

  • Advances in material and friction data for modelling of metal machining

    Shreyes N. Melkote;Wit Grzesik;Jose Outeiro;Joel Rech

  • Topography of as built surfaces generated in metal additive manufacturing: A multi scale analysis from form to roughness

    Frédéric Cabanettes;Frédéric Cabanettes;A. Joubert;G. Chardon;V. Dumas

  • Characterisation of friction and heat partition coefficients at the tool-work material interface in cutting

    J. Rech;P.J. Arrazola;C. Claudin;C. Courbon

  • Investigation of machining performance in high-pressure jet assisted turning of Inconel 718: An experimental study

    C. Courbon;C. Courbon;D. Kramar;P. Krajnik;F. Pusavec

  • Tribological behaviour of Ti6Al4V and Inconel718 under dry and cryogenic conditions—Application to the context of machining with carbide tools

    C. Courbon;F. Pusavec;F. Dumont;J. Rech

  • Identification of a friction model—Application to the context of dry cutting of an AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel with a TiN coated carbide tool

    C. Bonnet;F. Valiorgue;F. Valiorgue;J. Rech;C. Claudin

  • CFRP drilling: Fundamental study of local feed force and consequences on hole exit damage

    Cédric Bonnet;Gérard Poulachon;Joël Rech;Yannick Girard

  • Numerical modelling of orthogonal cutting: influence of numerical parameters

    M. Barge;H. Hamdi;J. Rech;J.-M. Bergheau

  • Tribological and thermal functions of cutting tool coatings

    J Rech;A Kusiak;J.L Battaglia

  • Identification of a friction model at tool/chip/workpiece interfaces in dry machining of AISI4142 treated steels

    F. Zemzemi;F. Zemzemi;J. Rech;W. Ben Salem;A. Dogui

  • Effect of the belt grinding on the surface texture: Modeling of the contact and abrasive wear

    A. Jourani;M. Dursapt;H. Hamdi;J. Rech

  • Influence of cutting edge radius on the wear resistance of PM-HSS milling inserts

    J. Rech;Y.-C. Yen;M.J. Schaff;H. Hamdi

  • Influence of ball burnishing on residual stress profile of a 15-5PH stainless steel

    V. Chomienne;F. Valiorgue;J. Rech;C. Verdu

  • Cryogenic machining as an alternative turning process of normalized and hardened AISI 52100 bearing steel

    M. Biček;F. Dumont;C. Courbon;F. Pušavec

  • Surface finish on hardened bearing steel parts produced by superhard and abrasive tools

    W. Grzesik;J. Rech;T. Wanat

  • Hybrid model for the prediction of residual stresses induced by 15-5PH steel turning

    Alexandre Mondelin;Frédéric Valiorgue;Joël Rech;Michel Coret

  • Identification of a friction model—Application to the context of dry cutting of an AISI 1045 annealed steel with a TiN-coated carbide tool

    J. Rech;C. Claudin;E. D’Eramo

  • Characterization and modelling of the residual stresses induced by belt finishing on a AISI52100 hardened steel

    J. Rech;G. Kermouche;W. Grzesik;C. García-Rosales

  • Influence of cutting tool coatings on the tribological phenomena at the tool–chip interface in orthogonal dry turning

    J. Rech

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Michel Bergheau
Jean-Michel Bergheau École Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Saint-Étienne
Tarek Mabrouki
Tarek Mabrouki Tunis El Manar University
Wit Grzesik
Wit Grzesik Opole University of Technology
Janez Kopac
Janez Kopac University of Ljubljana
Franci Pusavec
Franci Pusavec University of Ljubljana
Gérard Poulachon
Gérard Poulachon Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology
I.S. Jawahir
I.S. Jawahir University of Kentucky
Fritz Klocke
Fritz Klocke RWTH Aachen University
Konstantinos-Dionysios Bouzakis
Konstantinos-Dionysios Bouzakis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Dragos Axinte
Dragos Axinte University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many engineering graduates consider transitioning into fields with strong interpersonal and analytical skills, such as counseling or speech-language pathology.

If you're looking at a career that balances technical knowledge with human interaction, pursuing an easy to get counseling degree might be appealing. These programs focus on practical skills and offer flexible online options for quicker entry into the workforce.

Similarly, the healthcare and behavioral sciences offer robust alternatives. For instance, a fast track ABA masters online program enables professionals to gain certifications rapidly, making it an excellent choice for those seeking to pivot their careers efficiently.

For those interested in speech and language services, understanding whether is it hard to get into SLP grad school can help set realistic expectations about the admission process. Additionally, some may prefer programs ranked as the easiest SLP masters to get into, which can offer more accessible entry points without compromising program quality.

Exploring these related fields online accommodates various career goals, supporting a smooth transition from engineering to impactful roles in counseling, applied behavior analysis, or speech-language pathology.

Best Scientists Citing Joël Rech

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles