World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 53 13326 11995 3489 2851 103 7341

Joann Sanders-Loehr publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joann Sanders-Loehr between 1981 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joann Sanders-Loehr published across 38 years, from 1981 to 2018, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 1993. 1 of the 105 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 1993. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 8 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication
1981 2018

105 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joann Sanders-Loehr: publications per year, 1981 to 2018
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 3
1983 4
1984 5
1985 1
1986 3
1987 4
1988 7
1989 7
1990 3
1991 5
1992 5
1993 9
1994 6
1995 6
1996 8
1997 9
1998 3
1999 1
2000 8
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 1
2017 0
2018 1
Total 105
Download as CSV

Joann Sanders-Loehr publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joann Sanders-Loehr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 103 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623 103
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Joann Sanders-Loehr D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joann Sanders-Loehr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872 53
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Joann Sanders-Loehr is affiliated with Portland State University in the United States. Their research profile does not include specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues in the available data.

There are no recorded book publications or awards listed in the current data. Similarly, no detailed information about main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work has been provided.

Based on the source data, the overview focuses on the affiliation and the absence of bibliometric details such as publication counts or areas of specialization.

Best Publications

  • The environment of Fe4S4 clusters in ferredoxins and high-potential iron proteins. New information from x-ray crystallography and resonance Raman spectroscopy

    Gabriele Backes;Yoshiki Mino;Thomas M. Loehr;Terrence E. Meyer

  • Resonance Raman evidence for an Fe-O-Fe center in stearoyl-ACP desaturase. Primary sequence identity with other diiron-oxo proteins.

    Brian G. Fox;John Shanklin;Jingyuan Ai;Thomas M. Loehr

  • Electronic and Raman spectroscopic properties of oxo-bridged dinuclear iron centers in proteins and model compounds

    Joann Sanders-Loehr;William D. Wheeler;Andrew K. Shiemke;Bruce A. Averill

  • Peroxodiferric intermediate of stearoyl-acyl carrier protein delta 9 desaturase: oxidase reactivity during single turnover and implications for the mechanism of desaturation.

    J. A. Broadwater;Jingyuan Ai;T. M. Loehr;J. Sanders-Loehr

  • Glyoxal Oxidase From Phanerochaete Chrysosporium Is a New Radical-Copper Oxidase

    Mei M. Whittaker;Philip J. Kersten;Nobuhumi Nakamura;Joann Sanders-Loehr

  • Spectroscopic and magnetic studies of the purple acid phosphatase from bovine spleen

    Bruce A. Averill;James C. Davis;Sudhir Burman;Teresa Zirino

  • (μ-Oxo)(μ-carboxylato)diiron(III) Complexes with Distinct Iron Sites. Consequences of the Inequivalence and Its Relevance to Dinuclear Iron-Oxo Proteins

    Richard E. Norman;Shiping Yan;Lawrence Que;Gabriele Backes

  • The Catalytic Center in Nitrous Oxide Reductase, CuZ, Is a Copper−Sulfide Cluster†

    Tim Rasmussen;Ben C. Berks;Joann Sanders-Loehr;David M. Dooley

  • Raman Spectroscopy as an Indicator of Cu-S Bond Length in Type 1 and Type 2 Copper Cysteinate Proteins

    Colin R. Andrew;Hyeyeong Yeom;Joan Selverstone Valentine;B. Goeran Karlsson

  • Active site structures of deoxyhemerythrin and oxyhemerythrin

    Ronald E. Stenkamp;Larry C. Sieker;L. H. Jensen;John D. McCallum

  • Raman spectral evidence for a mu-oxo bridge in the binuclear iron center of ribonucleotide reductase.

    B M Sjöberg;T M Loehr;J Sanders-Loehr

  • Resonance Raman study of oxyhemerythrin and hydroxomethemerythrin. Evidence for hydrogen bonding of ligands to the iron-oxygen-iron center.

    Andrew K. Shiemke;Thomas M. Loehr;Joann. Sanders-Loehr

  • Resonance Raman excitation profiles indicate multiple Cys → Cu charge transfer transitions in type 1 copper proteins

    Jane Han;Thomas M. Loehr;Yi Lu;Joan Selverstone Valentine

  • A hemerythrin-like domain in a bacterial chemotaxis protein.

    Junjie Xiong;Donald M. Kurtz;Jingyuan Ai;Joann Sanders-Loehr

  • Common Oxygen Binding Site in Hemocyanins from Arthropods and Mollusks. Evidence from Raman Spectroscopy and Normal Coordinate Analysis

    Jinshu Ling;Lisa P. Nestor;Roman S. Czernuszewicz;Thomas G. Spiro

  • Structure of the binuclear iron complex in metazidohaemerythrin from Themiste dyscritum at 2.2. Å resolution

    R. E. Stenkamp;L. C. Siecker;L. H. Jensen;J. Sanders-Loehr

  • Resonance Raman study of the .mu.-oxo-bridged binuclear iron center in oxyhemerythrin

    Andrew K. Shiemke;Thomas M. Loehr;Joann Sanders-Loehr

  • Resonance Raman spectra of plastocyanin and pseudoazurin: evidence for conserved cysteine ligand conformations in cupredoxins (blue copper proteins).

    Jane Han;Elinor T. Adman;Teruhiko Beppu;Rachel Codd

  • Copper(2+) binding to the surface residue cysteine 111 of His46Arg human copper-zinc superoxide dismutase, a familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mutant.

    Hongbin Liu;Haining Zhu;Daryl K. Eggers;Aram M. Nersissian

  • Dioxygen is the source of the mu-oxo bridge in iron ribonucleotide reductase.

    M Sahlin;B M Sjöberg;T M Loehr

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerard W. Canters
Gerard W. Canters Leiden University
Judith P. Klinman
Judith P. Klinman University of California, Berkeley
Johannis A. Duine
Johannis A. Duine Delft University of Technology
Ronald E. Stenkamp
Ronald E. Stenkamp University of Washington
Pierre Moënne-Loccoz
Pierre Moënne-Loccoz Oregon Health & Science University
Victor L. Davidson
Victor L. Davidson University of Central Florida
Donald M. Kurtz
Donald M. Kurtz The University of Texas at San Antonio
Britt-Marie Sjöberg
Britt-Marie Sjöberg Stockholm University
Brian G. Fox
Brian G. Fox University of Wisconsin–Madison
Edward A. Stern
Edward A. Stern University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in chemistry, especially its application in legal and investigative fields, several online programs offer specialized paths. For example, online forensic science courses provide foundational knowledge that merges chemistry with law enforcement and criminal investigation techniques. These courses emphasize analytical methods and evidence handling, making them ideal for chemistry students seeking practical applications.

Additionally, pursuing an online forensic psychology masters can broaden career options by exploring the psychological aspects behind criminal behavior. This interdisciplinary approach can complement a background in chemistry by understanding how forensic evidence relates to human actions and motivations.

Career opportunities in this niche are diverse and growing. Exploring forensic science career options reveals roles in laboratories, law enforcement agencies, and private consultancy, all of which value strong chemistry skills combined with forensic expertise.

When considering these programs, it’s important to factor in costs. Researching criminal justice degree cost information helps students budget effectively and choose affordable options without compromising the quality of education.

Best Scientists Citing Joann Sanders-Loehr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles