World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
75
Citations
25776
World Ranking
1987
National Ranking
951

Jin-Moo Lee publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jin-Moo Lee sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 335 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jin-Moo Lee D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jin-Moo Lee sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jin-Moo Lee is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Medicine and Neuroscience with a notable presence in subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Genetics.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, including:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Frequent publication venues for Jin-Moo Lee include:

  • Stroke
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurology
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • UNC Libraries

Some of the recent publications authored or co-authored by Lee are:

  • Impact of Sleep Disorders and Disturbed Sleep on Brain Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, 2024, Stroke
  • Noncoding RNAs in Cardiovascular Disease: Current Knowledge, Tools and Technologies for Investigation, and Future Directions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, 2020, Circulation Genomic and Precision Medicine
  • Association of Data-Driven White Matter Hyperintensity Spatial Signatures With Distinct Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Etiologies, 2022, Neurology
  • Peripheral monocyte-derived cells counter amyloid plaque pathogenesis in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease, 2022, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Genome-Wide Association Study Meta-Analysis of Stroke in 22 000 Individuals of African Descent Identifies Novel Associations With Stroke, 2020, Stroke

Jin-Moo Lee frequently collaborates with several co-authors, among whom are:

  • Andria L. Ford
  • Yasheng Chen
  • Hongyu An
  • Kristin P. Guilliams
  • Melanie E. Fields

Best Publications

  • An Updated Definition of Stroke for the 21st Century A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Ralph L. Sacco;Scott E. Kasner;Joseph P. Broderick;Louis R. Caplan

  • The changing landscape of ischaemic brain injury mechanisms

    Jin Moo Lee;Gregory J. Zipfel;Dennis W. Choi

  • Neuronal activity regulates the regional vulnerability to amyloid-β deposition

    Adam W Bero;Ping Yan;Jee Hoon Roh;John R Cirrito

  • Astrocytes: a central element in neurological diseases

    Milos Pekny;Milos Pekny;Milos Pekny;Marcela Pekna;Marcela Pekna;Marcela Pekna;Albee Messing;Christian Steinhäuser

  • Brain tissue responses to ischemia

    Jin-Moo Lee;Margaret C. Grabb;Gregory J. Zipfel;Dennis W. Choi

  • Matrix Metalloproteinases Expressed by Astrocytes Mediate Extracellular Amyloid-β Peptide Catabolism

    Ke Jie Yin;John R. Cirrito;Ping Yan;Xiaoyan Hu

  • Neuronal apoptosis after CNS injury: the roles of glutamate and calcium.

    Gregory J. Zipfel;Debra J. Babcock;Jin-Moo Lee;Dennis W. Choi

  • Attenuating astrocyte activation accelerates plaque pathogenesis in APP/PS1 mice

    Andrew W. Kraft;Xiaoyan Hu;Hyejin Yoon;Ping Yan

  • Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Bruce C V. Campbell;Wim H. Van Zwam;Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K. Menon

  • Amyloid-β peptide induces oligodendrocyte death by activating the neutral sphingomyelinase–ceramide pathway

    Jiunn Tay Lee;Jan Xu;Jin Moo Lee;Grace Ku

  • Imaging of functional connectivity in the mouse brain.

    Brian R. White;Adam Q. Bauer;Abraham Z. Snyder;Bradley L. Schlaggar

  • Characterizing the appearance and growth of amyloid plaques in APP/PS1 mice.

    Ping Yan;Adam W. Bero;John R. Cirrito;Qingli Xiao

  • Multiancestry genome-wide association study of 520,000 subjects identifies 32 loci associated with stroke and stroke subtypes

    Rainer Malik;Ganesh Chauhan;Matthew Traylor;Muralidharan Sargurupremraj

  • Enhancing astrocytic lysosome biogenesis facilitates Aβ clearance and attenuates amyloid plaque pathogenesis.

    Qingli Xiao;Ping Yan;Xiucui Ma;Haiyan Liu

  • Genetically Determined Levels of Circulating Cytokines and Risk of Stroke

    Marios K Georgakis;Dipender Gill;Kristiina Rannikmäe;Matthew Traylor

  • Stroke Severity Is a Crucial Predictor of Outcome: An International Prospective Validation Study

    Natalia S. Rost;Alex Bottle;Jin‐Moo Lee;Marc Randall

  • Neuronal-Targeted TFEB Accelerates Lysosomal Degradation of APP, Reducing Aβ Generation and Amyloid Plaque Pathogenesis.

    Qingli Xiao;Ping Yan;Xiucui Ma;Haiyan Liu

  • Loci associated with ischaemic stroke and its subtypes (SiGN) : A genome-wide association study

    Sara L Pulit;Patrick F McArdle;Quenna Wong;Rainer Malik

  • Dopamine antagonist haloperidol decreases substance P, substance K, and preprotachykinin mRNAs in rat striatonigral neurons.

    M. J. Bannon;Jin-Moo Lee;P. Giraud;A. Young

  • Visinin-like protein-1: diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in Alzheimer disease

    Rawan Tarawneh;Gina D'Angelo;Elizabeth Macy;Chengjie Xiong

  • An Updated Definition of Stroke for the 21st Century A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Endorsed by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons

    Ralph L. Sacco;Scott E. Kasner;Joseph P. Broderick;Louis R. Caplan

Frequent Co-Authors

Weili Lin
Weili Lin University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chung Y. Hsu
Chung Y. Hsu China Medical University
Joan Montaner
Joan Montaner Autonomous University of Barcelona
William J. Powers
William J. Powers University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Turgut Tatlisumak
Turgut Tatlisumak University of Gothenburg
Jonathan Rosand
Jonathan Rosand Harvard University
Vincent Thijs
Vincent Thijs Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
David M. Holtzman
David M. Holtzman Washington University in St. Louis
Joshua S. Shimony
Joshua S. Shimony Washington University in St. Louis
Abraham Z. Snyder
Abraham Z. Snyder Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in careers that align with neuroscience, several related graduate programs are available online. Exploring cacrep-accredited online counseling programs is a great starting point for those looking to pursue a counseling license while maintaining affordability and flexibility.

Budget-conscious learners may want to consider the cheapest online master's in counseling, which prepares graduates for diverse roles such as therapists, mental health counselors, and school counselors.

Another pathway is through mft masters programs, designed for those aiming to become Marriage and Family Therapists—a field that benefits from a solid foundation in behavioral and brain sciences.

Broader options like an affordable online master's in psychology are also available. These programs can open doors to research, academic, and clinical careers, and often complement neuroscience studies.

Each route offers unique opportunities and skill development, helping graduates meet the ongoing demand for mental health professionals and researchers across the United States.

Best Scientists Citing Jin-Moo Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles