World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
31
Citations
4607
World Ranking
7507
National Ranking
3659

James D. Reschovsky publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Reschovsky sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 128 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

James D. Reschovsky D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Reschovsky sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Changes in career satisfaction among primary care and specialist physicians, 1997-2001.

    Bruce E. Landon;James Reschovsky;David Blumenthal

  • Leaving medicine: the consequences of physician dissatisfaction.

    Bruce E Landon;James D Reschovsky;Hoangmai H Pham;David Blumenthal

  • Market Incentives to Encourage Household Waste Recycling: Paying for What You Throw Away

    Unknown

  • Physicians’ Fears Of Malpractice Lawsuits Are Not Assuaged By Tort Reforms

    Emily R. Carrier;James D. Reschovsky;Michelle M. Mello;Ralph C. Mayrell

  • Access And Quality: Does Rural America Lag Behind?

    James D. Reschovsky;Andrea B. Staiti

  • Does Publicly Provided Home Care Substitute for Family Care? Experimental Evidence with Endogenous Living Arrangements

    Unknown

  • Do Primary Care Physicians Treating Minority Patients Report Problems Delivering High-Quality Care? Practice resources appear to be a determining factor in whether or not physicians treating predominantly minority patients deliver care of adequate quality.

    James D. Reschovsky;Ann S. O’Malley

  • Methods of Observing Variations in Physicians' Decisions: The Opportunities of Clinical Vignettes

    Lara Converse;Kirsten Barrett;Eugene Rich;James Reschovsky

  • Rapidity and modality of imaging for acute low back pain in elderly patients.

    Hoangmai H. Pham;Bruce E. Landon;James D. Reschovsky;Beny Wu

  • The effects of independent living on persons with chronic mental illness: an assessment of the Section 8 certificate program.

    Sandra J. Newman;James D. Reschovsky;Keith Kaneda;Anne M. Hendrick

  • Understanding Differences Between High- And Low-Price Hospitals: Implications For Efforts To Rein In Costs

    Chapin White;James D. Reschovsky;Amelia M. Bond

  • High Physician Concern About Malpractice Risk Predicts More Aggressive Diagnostic Testing In Office-Based Practice

    Emily R. Carrier;James D. Reschovsky;David A. Katz;Michelle M. Mello

  • Physicians' assessments of their ability to provide high-quality care in a changing health care system.

    James Reschovsky;Marie Reed;David Blumenthal;Bruce Landon

  • Following the Money: Factors Associated with the Cost of Treating High-Cost Medicare Beneficiaries

    James D. Reschovsky;Jack Hadley;Cynthia B. Saiontz-Martinez;Ellyn R. Boukus

  • Factors Contributing to Variations in Physicians' Use of Evidence at The Point of Care: A Conceptual Model.

    James D. Reschovsky;Eugene C. Rich;Timothy K. Lake

  • Methodological Approaches to Understanding Causes of Health Disparities

    Neal Jeffries;Alan M. Zaslavsky;Ana V. Diez Roux;John W. Creswell

  • Association between imposition of a maintenance of certification requirement and ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations and health care costs

    Bradley M. Gray;Jonathan L. Vandergrift;Mary M. Johnston;James D. Reschovsky

  • Association Between Imposition of a Maintenance of Certification Requirement and Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Hospitalizations and Health Care Costs

    Bradley M. Gray;Jonathan L. Vandergrift;Mary M. Johnston;James D. Reschovsky

  • Effects of compensation methods and physician group structure on physicians' perceived incentives to alter services to patients.

    James D. Reschovsky;Jack Hadley;Bruce E. Landon

  • The Results Are Only as Good as the Sample: Assessing Three National Physician Sampling Frames.

    Catherine M. DesRoches;Kirsten A. Barrett;Bonnie E. Harvey;Rachel Kogan

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce E. Landon
Bruce E. Landon Harvard University
Jack Hadley
Jack Hadley Urban Institute
David Blumenthal
David Blumenthal Harvard University
Catherine M. DesRoches
Catherine M. DesRoches Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Sandra J. Newman
Sandra J. Newman Johns Hopkins University
Paul B. Ginsburg
Paul B. Ginsburg University of Southern California
Stephen M. Shortell
Stephen M. Shortell University of California, Berkeley
Peter J. Cunningham
Peter J. Cunningham Virginia Commonwealth University
Christopher J. Recklitis
Christopher J. Recklitis Harvard University
Wendy Leisenring
Wendy Leisenring Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James D. Reschovsky

Recently Published Articles