World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
13694
World Ranking
8818
National Ranking
2520

James D. Lear publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Lear sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 103 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

James D. Lear D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Lear sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

James D. Lear is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research contributions span the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology as well as Neuroscience. Within these broader fields, they have focused on subfields including Cell Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Their scientific work centers primarily on topics related to microtubule and mitosis dynamics, cellular transport and secretion, and photoreceptor and optogenetics research.

James D. Lear has published in the following venues:

  • PLoS ONE

One recent publication by Lear is titled "Correction: Dynein and Dynactin Leverage Their Bivalent Character to Form a High-Affinity Interaction," published in 2024 in PLoS ONE.

Collaborations feature a range of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Amanda E. Siglin
  • Shangjin Sun
  • Jeffrey K. Moore
  • Sarah Tan
  • Martin Poenie

Best Publications

  • Synthetic amphiphilic peptide models for protein ion channels

    JD Lear;ZR Wasserman;WF DeGrado

  • Protein design, a minimalist approach

    William F. DeGrado;Zelda R. Wasserman;James D. Lear

  • Design and synthesis of multi-haem proteins

    D E Robertson;R S Farid;C C Moser;J L Urbauer

  • A functionally defined model for the M2 proton channel of influenza A virus suggests a mechanism for its ion selectivity.

    Lawrence H. Pinto;Gregg R. Dieckmann;Chris S. Gandhi;Carol G. Papworth

  • Induction of peptide conformation at apolar water interfaces. 1. A study with model peptides of defined hydrophobic periodicity

    W. F. DeGrado;J. D. Lear

  • Asparagine-mediated self-association of a model transmembrane helix

    Christin Choma;Christin Choma;Holly Gratkowski;James D. Lear;William F. DeGrado

  • Polar side chains drive the association of model transmembrane peptides.

    Holly Gratkowski;James D. Lear;William F. DeGrado

  • Activation of Integrin αIIbß3 by Modulation of Transmembrane Helix Associations

    Renhao Li;Neal Mitra;Holly Gratkowski;Gaston Vilaire

  • Helical beta-peptide inhibitors of the p53-hDM2 interaction.

    Joshua A. Kritzer;James D. Lear;Michael E. Hodsdon;Alanna Schepartz

  • Membrane binding and conformational properties of peptides representing the NH2 terminus of influenza HA-2.

    J D Lear;W F DeGrado

  • Design of a heme-binding four-helix bundle

    Christin T. Choma;James D. Lear;Mark J. Nelson;P. Leslie Dutton

  • Multivalent ligand-receptor binding interactions in the fibroblast growth factor system produce a cooperative growth factor and heparin mechanism for receptor dimerization.

    Michael W. Pantoliano;Robert A. Horlick;Barry A. Springer;Drew E. Van Dyk

  • Computational design of peptides that target transmembrane helices.

    Hang Yin;Joanna S. Slusky;Bryan W. Berger;Robin S. Walters

  • Phospholipid interactions of synthetic peptides representing the N-terminus of HIV gp41.

    Rafalski M;Lear Jd;DeGrado Wf

  • Synthetic peptides as models for ion channel proteins

    Karin S. Akerfeldt;Jim D. Lear;Zelda R. Wasserman;Laura A. Chung

  • Total Chemical Synthesis of the Integral Membrane Protein Influenza A Virus M2: Role of Its C-Terminal Domain in Tetramer Assembly†

    Gerd G. Kochendoerfer;David Salom;James D. Lear;Rosemarie Wilk-Orescan

  • How do helix–helix interactions help determine the folds of membrane proteins? Perspectives from the study of homo-oligomeric helical bundles

    William F. DeGrado;Holly Gratkowski;James D. Lear

  • Oligomerization of the integrin alphaIIbbeta3: roles of the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains.

    Renhao Li;Charles R. Babu;James D. Lear;A. Joshua Wand

  • Use of thiol-disulfide equilibria to measure the energetics of assembly of transmembrane helices in phospholipid bilayers

    Lidia Cristian;James D. Lear;William F. DeGrado

  • Tetraphilin : a four-helix proton channel built on a tetraphenylporphyrin framework

    Karin S. Akerfeldt;Ronald M. Kim;Daniel Camac;John T. Groves

Frequent Co-Authors

William F. DeGrado
William F. DeGrado University of California, San Francisco
Joel S. Bennett
Joel S. Bennett University of Pennsylvania
Robert A. Lamb
Robert A. Lamb Northwestern University
Lawrence H. Pinto
Lawrence H. Pinto Northwestern University
A. Joshua Wand
A. Joshua Wand University of Pennsylvania
Hang Yin
Hang Yin Tsinghua University
Peter N. Walsh
Peter N. Walsh Temple University
Michelle R. Arkin
Michelle R. Arkin University of California, San Francisco
Barry S. Cooperman
Barry S. Cooperman University of Pennsylvania
Andrew Pekosz
Andrew Pekosz Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various specialized careers that often require additional education or training. For those interested in healthcare, understanding the steps to become a pharmacist is essential. Pharmacists combine chemistry knowledge with patient care to ensure safe medication use.

Alternatively, careers in forensic science are increasingly popular. Aspiring professionals may consider enrolling in an autopsy technician school to gain hands-on experience in medical examinations and pathology, careers closely tied to chemical analysis.

For those seeking flexible learning options, an online forensic science degree offers affordable pathways to enter forensic and analytical roles, many of which rely heavily on chemistry principles.

Moreover, advancing your expertise with an online master's degree in forensic psychology can lead to unique interdisciplinary careers. This degree blends psychology with forensic science, providing a broader understanding of criminal behavior and investigative processes.

Exploring these related degrees and career pathways can help chemistry students tailor their education toward in-demand professions with promising futures.

Best Scientists Citing James D. Lear

Recently Published Articles