World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
8688
World Ranking
8685
National Ranking
57

Ivan Divac publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan Divac sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 118 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ivan Divac D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan Divac sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1984 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Ivan Divac is a researcher affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine with a focus on Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their scholarly work concentrates on the following main research topics:

  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Among their published works, a notable recent paper is titled "Correlation of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) with Invasive Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Aortic Coarctation Surgery in Pediatric Patients," published in 2024 in the journal Healthcare.

Ivan Divac has collaborated frequently with a group of co-authors, including:

  • Jelena Pjevalica
  • Tatjana Zecevic
  • A Pavlovic
  • Dejan Bisenic
  • Luka Stanisic

Their publications appear predominantly in the journal Healthcare, reflecting their engagement with clinical and medical research communities.

In recognition of professional standing, Ivan Divac was awarded the status of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1984.

Best Publications

  • Magnocellular nuclei of the basal forebrain project to neocortex, brain stem, and olfactory bulb. Review of some functional correlates.

    Ivan Divac

  • Biochemical evidence for glutamate as neurotransmitter in corticostriatal and corticothalamic fibres in rat brain

    F. Fonnum;J. Storm-Mathisen;I. Divac

  • Organization of catecholamine neurons projecting to the frontal cortex in the rat

    Olle Lindvall;Olle Lindvall;Anders Björklund;Anders Björklund;Ivan Divac;Ivan Divac

  • Behavioral effects of selective ablation of the caudate nucleus.

    Unknown

  • High affinity uptake of glutamate in terminals of corticostriatal axons.

    Ivan Divac;Frode Fonnum;Jon Storm-Mathisen

  • Subcortical projections to the prefrontal cortex in the rat as revealed by the horseradish peroxidase technique.

    I. Divac;Anna Kosmal;A. Björklund;O. Lindvall

  • Converging projections from the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus and mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons to the neocortex in three species.

    I. Divac;A. Björklund;O. Lindvall;R. E. Passingham

  • Behavioral and anatomical consequences of small intrastriatal injections of kainic acid in the rat

    Ivan Divac;Hans J. Markowitsch;Monika Pritzel

  • Heterogeneous afferents to the inferior parietal lobule of the rhesus monkey revealed by the retrograde transport method

    I. Divac;J.H. LaVail;P. Rakic;K.R. Winston

  • NEOSTRIATUM AND FUNCTIONS OF PREFRONTAL CORTEX

    Ivan Divac

  • Selective ablations within the prefrontal cortex of the rat and performance of delayed alternation

    Jens Knud Larsen;Ivan Divac

  • “Cognitive” Functions of the Neostriatum

    R. Gunilla E. Öberg;Ivan Divac

  • The prefrontal 'cortex' in the pigeon. Behavioral evidence.

    Jesper Mogensen;Ivan Divac

  • Retention of spatial delayed alternation in rats with lesions in the frontal lobes. Implications for a comparative neuropsychology of the prefrontal system.

    Unknown

  • Regional distribution of catecholamines in monkey cerebral cortex, evidence for a dopaminergic innervation of the primate prefrontal cortex.

    Anders Björklund;Anders Björklund;Ivan Divac;Ivan Divac;Olle Lindvall;Olle Lindvall

  • Differences in glutamate uptake in astrocytes cultured from different brain regions

    Arne Schousboe;Ivan Divac

  • Frontal lobe system and spatial reversal in the rat.

    Unknown

  • The monocular and binocular subfields of the rat's primary visual cortex: A quantitative morphological approach

    Karl Zilles;Andreas Wree;Axel Schleicher;Ivan Divac

  • Spontaneous alternation in rats with lesions in the frontal lobes: An extension of the frontal lobe syndrome

    I. Divac;R. G. E. Wikmark;A. Gade

  • Prefrontal system in the rat visualized by means of labeled deoxyglucose--further evidence for functional heterogeneity of the neostriatum.

    Ivan Divac;Nils H. Diemer

  • The basal ganglia and the control of movement: Levels of motor planning Cognition and the control of movement

    R.Gunilla E. Öberg;Ivan Divac

  • Behavioural effects of ablation of the pigeon-equivalent of the mammalian prefrontal cortex

    Jesper Mogensen;Ivan Divac

  • The prefrontal cortex of the cat: anatomical subdivisions based on retrograde labeling of cells in the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus.

    H J Markowitsch;M Pritzel;I Divac

  • Cortical circuits: Synaptic organization of the cerebral cortex. Structure, function and theory

    Ivan Divac

Frequent Co-Authors

Anders Björklund
Anders Björklund Lund University
Karl Zilles
Karl Zilles Forschungszentrum Jülich
Axel Schleicher
Axel Schleicher Forschungszentrum Jülich
Richard E. Passingham
Richard E. Passingham University of Oxford
Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
Barry J. Everitt
Barry J. Everitt University of Cambridge
Hans J. Markowitsch
Hans J. Markowitsch Bielefeld University
Gitta Wörtwein
Gitta Wörtwein University of Copenhagen
Olle Lindvall
Olle Lindvall Lund University
Peter J. Hand
Peter J. Hand Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and professional pathways. Many students interested in brain science also consider broader psychology programs, given their overlapping coursework and career opportunities. For those looking for flexibility and affordability, exploring an online psychology degree can be an excellent option.

Alternatively, those passionate about clinical practice might pursue an advanced credential. Mental health fields are expanding, and students can now access 1 year msw programs online no bsw, providing a faster route to licensure and counseling roles. Another clinical pathway is through psyd programs, which emphasize applied psychological practice and direct patient care.

Additionally, those interested in relationship-focused therapy may consider online marriage and family therapy programs, which are well-suited for students eager to support families and couples. Each path offers unique opportunities and complements a neuroscience background, providing critical skills needed in today's health and research sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Ivan Divac

Recently Published Articles