World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
5013
World Ranking
9326
National Ranking
68

Ina M. Tarkka publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ina M. Tarkka sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 126 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ina M. Tarkka D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ina M. Tarkka sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ina M. Tarkka is affiliated with the University of Jyväskylä in Finland. Their research spans multiple disciplines primarily within neuroscience and medicine, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience, rehabilitation, pharmacology, physiology, and psychiatry and mental health.

Their work concentrates on key topics including EEG and brain-computer interfaces, functional brain connectivity studies, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, neural dynamics and brain function, pain mechanisms and treatments, and cerebral palsy and movement disorders.

Recent publications by Ina M. Tarkka include:

  • European evidence-based recommendations for clinical assessment of upper limb in neurorehabilitation (CAULIN): data synthesis from systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus, 2021, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
  • Older Age Increases the Amplitude of Muscle Stretch-Induced Cortical Beta-Band Suppression But Does not Affect Rebound Strength, 2020, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Perimenopausal women show modulation of excitatory and inhibitory neuromuscular mechanisms, 2021, BMC Women s Health
  • Does chronic pain hinder physical activity among older adults with type 2 diabetes?, 2020, Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
  • Twin studies on the association of physical activity with cognitive and cerebral outcomes, 2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Ina M. Tarkka include:

  • Heidi Pesonen
  • Pekka Hautasaari
  • Simon Walker
  • Gerdienke B. Prange-Lasonder
  • Margit Alt Murphy

Their research has been published in a variety of venues such as:

  • Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • BMC Women s Health
  • Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Ina M. Tarkka's scientific contributions are grounded in interdisciplinary approaches that integrate clinical assessment, neurophysiology, and rehabilitation sciences. Their work on upper limb neurorehabilitation and neuromuscular mechanisms addresses both aging and disease contexts.

Their studies involving cortical beta-band suppression and neuromuscular modulation provide insights relevant to understanding brain function changes across different populations. Additionally, investigations into the impact of chronic pain on physical activity among diabetic older adults reflect a focus on health psychology and behavioral medicine aspects.

Ina M. Tarkka maintains a research profile characterized by collaboration and multidisciplinary integration within neuroscience and medicine.

Best Publications

  • Equivalent electrical source analysis of pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by a CO2 laser.

    Tarkka Im;Treede Rd

  • The effectiveness of body weight-supported gait training and floor walking in patients with chronic stroke.

    Sinikka H. Peurala;Ina M. Tarkka;Kauko Pitkänen;Juhani Sivenius

  • Electric source localization of the auditory P300 agrees with magnetic source localization

    I.M. Tarkka;D.S. Stokić;L.F.H. Basile;A.C. Papanicolaou

  • Cortical excitability changes following grasping exercise augmented with electrical stimulation

    Gergely Istvan Barsi;Dejan B. Popovic;Dejan B. Popovic;Ina M. Tarkka;Thomas Sinkjær

  • Congenital mirror movements. Abnormal organization of motor pathways in two patients.

    L. G. Cohen;J. Meer;I. Tarkka;S. Bierner

  • Effects of intensive therapy using gait trainer or floor walking exercises early after stroke.

    Sinikka H Peurala;Olavi Airaksinen;Pirjo Huuskonen;Pekka Jäkälä

  • The N30 component of somatosensory evoked potentials in patients with dystonia.

    J. Allen Reilly;Mark Hallett;Leonardo G. Cohen;Ina M. Tarkka

  • Augmentation of auditory N1 in children with fragile X syndrome.

    Maija Castrén;Ari Pääkkönen;Ina M. Tarkka;Markku Ryynänen

  • Cutaneous electrical stimulation may enhance sensorimotor recovery in chronic stroke

    Unknown

  • Gait Characteristics and Functional Ambulation Profile in Patients with Chronic Unilateral Stroke

    Ekaterina B. Titianova;Kauko Pitkänen;Ari Pääkkönen;Juhani Sivenius

  • Cortical topography of premotor and motor potentials preceding self-paced, voluntary movement of dominant and non-dominant hands.

    I.M. Tarkka;M. Hallett

  • Surface EMG and acceleration signals in Parkinson's disease: feature extraction and cluster analysis.

    Saara M. Rissanen;Markku Kankaanpää;Alexander Meigal;Mika P. Tarvainen

  • Postural instability in patients with chronic stroke.

    Sinikka H. Peurala;Paavo Könönen;Kauko Pitkänen;Juhani Sivenius

  • Movement‐related cortical potentials in patients with cerebellar degeneration

    I. M. Tarkka;S. Massaquoi;M. Hallett

  • Generators for human P300 elicited by somatosensory stimuli using multiple dipole source analysis

    I.M Tarkka;S Micheloyannis;D.S Stokić

  • Altered auditory processing in acutely psychotic never-medicated first-episode patients.

    Minna Valkonen-Korhonen;Maija Purhonen;Ina M. Tarkka;Perttu Sipilä

  • Source Localization of P300 from Oddball, Single Stimulus, and Omitted-Stimulus Paradigms

    Ina M. Tarkka;Dobrivoje S. Stokic

  • Functional MRI and motor behavioral changes obtained with constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke.

    M. Könönen;I. M. Tarkka;E. Niskanen;M. Pihlajamäki

  • Analysis of surface EMG signal morphology in Parkinson's disease.

    Saara Rissanen;Markku Kankaanpää;Mika P Tarvainen;Juho Nuutinen

  • Rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect: A randomized study using either arm activation or visual scanning training.

    R Luukkainen-Markkula;I M Tarkka;K Pitkänen;J Sivenius

  • Gait Impairment in a Rat Model of Focal Cerebral Ischemia

    Saara Parkkinen;Francisco J. Ortega;Kristina Kuptsova;Joanna Huttunen

  • Physical activity, fitness, glucose homeostasis, and brain morphology in twins.

    Mirva Rottensteiner;Tuija Leskinen;Eini Niskanen;Sari Aaltonen

  • Increased perfusion in motor areas after constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-photon emission computerized tomography study

    Mervi Könönen;Jyrki T Kuikka;Minna Husso-Saastamoinen;Esko Vanninen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jari Karhu
Jari Karhu Nexstim (Finland)
Urho M. Kujala
Urho M. Kujala University of Jyväskylä
Mervi Könönen
Mervi Könönen University of Eastern Finland
Jaakko Kaprio
Jaakko Kaprio University of Helsinki
Kai Kaarniranta
Kai Kaarniranta University of Eastern Finland
Johannes Lehtonen
Johannes Lehtonen University of Eastern Finland
Esa Mervaala
Esa Mervaala University of Eastern Finland
Dejan B. Popovic
Dejan B. Popovic Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
Heikki Hämäläinen
Heikki Hämäläinen University of Turku
Markku Alen
Markku Alen Oulu University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience doesn’t have to follow a traditional academic route. There are many online certification courses for those seeking to advance their career quickly or specialize in a related field, such as mental health or behavioral sciences. Certifications can lead to well-paying roles and offer flexibility if you already have a busy schedule.

If you are looking for the easiest degree to get online, consider fields with overlap in psychology, biology, or health sciences. These programs may offer less rigorous pathways while still building valuable foundational knowledge for neuroscience careers.

For those interested in a clinical path, exploring msw online programs (Master of Social Work) or the cheapest bcba online program (Board Certified Behavior Analyst) can be a smart move. Both are affordable, flexible, and open doors to meaningful, in-demand roles helping others.

Whether you want a short-term certification or a full degree, online education offers many accessible career pathways connected to neuroscience. Explore your options to match your interests, timeline, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Ina M. Tarkka

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles