World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
37
Citations
17673
World Ranking
2341
National Ranking
284

Hudong Chen publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hudong Chen sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 117 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Hudong Chen D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hudong Chen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Lattice Boltzmann model for simulating flows with multiple phases and components

    Xiaowen Shan;Hudong Chen

  • Recovery of the Navier-Stokes equations using a lattice-gas Boltzmann method.

    Hudong Chen;Shiyi Chen;William H. Matthaeus

  • Simulation of nonideal gases and liquid-gas phase transitions by the lattice Boltzmann equation.

    Unknown

  • Kinetic theory representation of hydrodynamics: a way beyond the Navier–Stokes equation

    Xiaowen Shan;Xue Feng Yuan;Hudong Chen

  • Lattice Boltzmann model for simulation of magnetohydrodynamics

    Shiyi Chen;Hudong Chen;Daniel Martnez;William Matthaeus

  • Simulation of multicomponent fluids in complex three-dimensional geometries by the lattice Boltzmann method

    Unknown

  • Extended Boltzmann kinetic equation for turbulent flows.

    Hudong Chen;Satheesh Kandasamy;Steven Orszag;Rick Shock

  • Realization of Fluid Boundary Conditions via Discrete Boltzmann Dynamics

    Hudong Chen;Chris Teixeira;Kim Molvig

  • Probability distribution of a stochastically advected scalar field.

    Hudong Chen;Shiyi Chen;Robert H. Kraichnan

  • Numerical study of flow past an impulsively started cylinder by the lattice-Boltzmann method

    Yanbing Li;Richard Shock;Raoyang Zhang;Hudong Chen

  • VOLUMETRIC FORMULATION OF THE LATTICE BOLTZMANN METHOD FOR FLUID DYNAMICS : BASIC CONCEPT

    Hudong Chen

  • Expanded analogy between Boltzmann kinetic theory of fluids and turbulence

    Hudong Chen;Steven A. Orszag;Ilya Staroselsky;Sauro Succi

  • Efficient kinetic method for fluid simulation beyond the Navier-Stokes equation.

    Raoyang Zhang;Xiaowen Shan;Hudong Chen

  • Lattice Boltzmann method for simulations of liquid-vapor thermal flows.

    Unknown

  • Digital Physics Approach to Computational Fluid Dynamics: Some Basic Theoretical Features

    Hudong Chen;Chris Teixeira;Kim Molvig

  • Colloquium: Role of the H theorem in lattice Boltzmann hydrodynamic simulations

    Sauro Succi;Iliya V. Karlin;Hudong Chen

  • Evaluation of the external force term in the discrete Boltzmann equation

    Nicos S. Martys;Xiaowen Shan;Hudong Chen

  • Red blood cells augment leukocyte rolling in a virtual blood vessel.

    Cristiano Migliorini;YueHong Qian;Hudong Chen;Edward B. Brown

  • A GENERAL MULTIPLE-RELAXATION-TIME BOLTZMANN COLLISION MODEL

    Xiaowen Shan;Hudong Chen

  • Non‐Gaussian statistics in isotropic turbulence

    Hudong Chen;Jackson R. Herring;Robert M. Kerr;Robert H. Kraichnan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens numerous career pathways, but students often consider related fields where online education provides flexibility and accessibility. For those interested in expanding their expertise or shifting focus, programs like counseling or Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) offer practical alternatives.

When selecting a program, understanding the acceptance process is crucial. For example, insights on slp grad school acceptance rate help applicants gauge their chances and prepare effectively. Additionally, some students may seek the easiest slp masters programs to get into, which can offer more straightforward entry points while maintaining program quality.

For those leaning toward behavioral sciences, pursuing a fastest online masters in applied behavior analysis provides accelerated pathways to certification and career advancement. Meanwhile, students exploring less intensive options might find value in understanding what is the easiest counseling degree, balancing workload with career goals.

Ultimately, combining engineering skills with complementary online degrees can diversify career options and meet evolving industry demands. Researching program requirements, acceptance criteria, and duration ensures informed decisions aligned with personal ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Hudong Chen

Recently Published Articles