World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 36 8619 8309 2391 2218 232 6468

Helen L. Reed publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Helen L. Reed between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Helen L. Reed published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2021. 4 of the 239 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2021. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1980 2025

239 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Helen L. Reed: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 1
1982 3
1983 1
1984 0
1985 3
1986 4
1987 7
1988 2
1989 6
1990 7
1991 2
1992 6
1993 5
1994 11
1995 3
1996 8
1997 4
1998 5
1999 6
2000 8
2001 5
2002 6
2003 7
2004 4
2005 3
2006 2
2007 1
2008 5
2009 3
2010 7
2011 5
2012 9
2013 7
2014 10
2015 8
2016 6
2017 7
2018 11
2019 8
2020 6
2021 12
2022 9
2023 1
2024 3
2025 1
Total 239
Download as CSV

Helen L. Reed publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen L. Reed sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 228–237 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 232 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321 232
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Helen L. Reed D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen L. Reed sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311 36
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Helen L. Reed is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. The primary research focus is within the field of Engineering, with a significant contribution to subfields including Computational Mechanics, Applied Mathematics, Aerospace Engineering, Ocean Engineering, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's work encompasses several main topics:

  • Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
  • Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
  • Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
  • Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
  • Combustion and flame dynamics
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments

Among recent scholarly contributions, the following papers stand out with details on publication year and venue:

  • Effect of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement on All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Aortic Stenosis (2022, JAMA)
  • Preflight Boundary-Layer Stability Analysis of BOLT Geometry (2020, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets)
  • Ionization and dissociation effects on boundary-layer stability (2020, Journal of Fluid Mechanics)
  • Analysis of the BOLT II - Holden Mission Flight and Wind Tunnel Geometries (2021, AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum)
  • Linear Parabolized Stability Analysis of the BOLT Flight Geometry at Off-Nominal Conditions (2020, AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM)

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Koen J. Groot
  • Charles D. Mullen
  • Madeline M. Peck
  • Ethan S. Beyak
  • Andrew K. Riha

Publication activity has been notably concentrated in these venues:

  • AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum
  • AIAA AVIATION 2021 FORUM
  • Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets
  • AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum
  • AIAA AVIATION 2022 Forum

Best Publications

  • STABILITY AND TRANSITION OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL BOUNDARY LAYERS

    William S. Saric;Helen L. Reed;Edward B. White

  • BOUNDARY-LAYER RECEPTIVITY TO FREESTREAM DISTURBANCES

    William S. Saric;Helen L. Reed;Edward J. Kerschen

  • Stability of three-dimensional boundary layers

    Helen L. Reed;William S. Saric

  • Linear Stability Theory Applied to Boundary Layers

    Helen L. Reed;William S. Saric;Daniel Arnal

  • Simulation of swept-wing vortices using nonlinear parabolized stability equations

    Tim S. Haynes;Helen L. Reed

  • Linear disturbances in hypersonic, chemically reacting shock layers

    Greg Stuckert;Helen L. Reed

  • Supersonic laminar flow control on swept wings using distributed roughness

    H. Reed;W. Saric

  • Drag Prediction and Transition in Hypersonic Flow

    Helen L. Reed;Roger Kimmel;Steven Schneider;Daniel Arnal

  • Passive control of transition in three-dimensional boundary layers, with emphasis on discrete roughness elements.

    William S. Saric;Andrew L. Carpenter;Helen L. Reed

  • Effect of leading-edge geometry on boundary-layer receptivity to freestream sound

    Nay Lin;Helen L. Reed;W. S. Saric

  • CROSSFLOW INSTABILITIES - THEORY & TECHNOLOGY

    William S. Saric;Helen L. Reed

  • Secondary instability analysis of crossflow on a hypersonic yawed straight circular cone

    Alexander J. Moyes;Pedro Paredes;Travis S. Kocian;Helen L. Reed

  • Wave interactions in swept-wing flows

    Helen L. Reed

  • Effect of suction and weak mass injection on boundary-layer transition

    William S. Saric;Helen L. Reed

  • JoKHeR: NPSE Simulations of Hypersonic Crossflow Instability

    Joseph Kuehl;Eduardo Perez;Helen Reed

  • Verification and Validation Issues in Hypersonic Stability and Transition Prediction

    Helen L. Reed;Eduardo Perez;Joseph Kuehl;Travis Kocian

  • University Nanosatellite Distributed Satelllite Capabilities to Support TechSat 21

    Kim Luu;Maurice Martin;Mike Stallard;Howard Schlossberg

  • Direct Numerical Simulation of Discrete Roughness on a Swept-Wing Leading Edge

    Donald P. Rizzetta;Miguel R. Visbal;Helen L. Reed;William S. Saric

  • Use of transition correlations for three-dimensional boundary layers within hypersonic flows

    Ian Lyttle;Helen Reed

  • Toward Practical Laminar Flow Control- Remaining Challenges

    William S. Saric;Helen L. Reed

  • Sensitivity Methods Applied to Orbital Pursuit-Evasion

    William T. Hafer;Helen L. Reed;James D. Turner;Khanh Pham

  • Leading-edge receptivity to sound: Experiments, DNS, theory

    William S. Saric;Helen L. Reed;Edward J. Kerschen

Frequent Co-Authors

William S. Saric
William S. Saric Texas A&M University
Joel H. Ferziger
Joel H. Ferziger Stanford University
David R. Jackson
David R. Jackson University of Houston
Mark B. Moldwin
Mark B. Moldwin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Steven P. Schneider
Steven P. Schneider Purdue University West Lafayette
Rodney D. W. Bowersox
Rodney D. W. Bowersox Texas A&M University
David G. Sibeck
David G. Sibeck Goddard Space Flight Center
Justin C. Kasper
Justin C. Kasper University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Miguel R. Visbal
Miguel R. Visbal United States Air Force Research Laboratory
Philippe R. Spalart
Philippe R. Spalart Boeing (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for engineers and technologists continues to grow, making flexible educational options more important than ever. Today, you can boost your credentials quickly with certificate programs designed for high-demand, well-paying careers. These focused, short-term courses help you gain specific technical skills needed in evolving industries.

For busy adults balancing family and work, especially mothers, online school for moms offers the convenience of earning a degree on your own schedule. Many programs offer evening or asynchronous coursework, helping you fit education into your lifestyle.

Learners seeking quick skill upgrades can benefit from 6 week certification programs. These rapid courses are ideal for upskilling or transitioning to new tech fields without committing to years of study.

Additionally, those interested in the financial side of technology may explore fast-track options like an accelerated finance degree online. This pathway prepares you for in-demand finance roles within tech industries in a condensed time frame.

Best Scientists Citing Helen L. Reed

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles