World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
6076
World Ranking
11294
National Ranking
5901

Hasker P. Davis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hasker P. Davis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 57 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Hasker P. Davis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hasker P. Davis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hasker P. Davis is affiliated with the University of Colorado Colorado Springs in the United States. Their recent research contributions focus on cognitive aging and mild cognitive impairment as illustrated by a publication in 2025.

Their latest paper titled Performance in the Iowa Gambling Task in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment was published in the journal Psychology and Aging in 2025. This work involves examining decision-making processes among aging populations using the Iowa Gambling Task, a commonly used psychological assessment tool.

The principal coauthor associated with this publication is Jeffrey C. Zemla, with whom they have collaborated on this study.

Hasker P. Davis's work has appeared in the following publication venue:

  • Psychology and Aging

Their research contributions relate primarily to the field represented by the journal, focusing on psychological and cognitive aspects in aging populations.

Best Publications

  • Protein synthesis and memory: a review

    Hasker P. Davis;Larry R. Squire

  • The Pharmacology of Memory: A Neurobiological Perspective

    Larry R. Squire;Hasker P. Davis

  • Older adults as adaptive decision makers: evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task.

    Stacey Wood;Jerome Busemeyer;Andreas Koling;Cathy R Cox

  • Age differences in fluid intelligence: Contributions of general slowing and frontal decline

    Julie M. Bugg;Nancy A. Zook;Edward L. DeLosh;Deana B. Davalos

  • Behavioral performance of rats following transient forebrain ischemia.

    Bruc E T. Volpe;William A. Pulsinelli;Joseph Tribuna;Hasker P. Davis

  • Working memory, inhibition, and fluid intelligence as predictors of performance on Tower of Hanoi and London tasks.

    Nancy A. Zook;Deana B. Davalos;Deana B. Davalos;Edward L. DeLosh;Hasker P. Davis

  • Lexical priming deficits as a function of age.

    Hasker P. Davis;Alisa Cohen;Michele Gandy;Paul Colombo

  • Organization of cognitive abilities and neuropsychological variables across the lifespan

    Timothy A. Salthouse;Hasker P. Davis

  • Age Differences in Stroop Interference: Contributions of General Slowing and Task-Specific Deficits

    Julie M Bugg;Edward L DeLosh;Deana B Davalos;Hasker P Davis

  • Acquisition, recall, and forgetting of verbal information in long-term memory by young, middle-aged, and elderly individuals.

    Hasker P Davis;Scott A Small;Yaakov Stern;Richard Mayeux

  • A Comparison of Computerized and Standard Versions of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

    Simeon N. Feldstein;Frederick R. Keller;Rebecca E. Portman;Robert L. Durham

  • Allocentric spatial and tactile memory impairments in rats with dorsal caudate lesions are affected by preoperative behavioral training.

    Paul J. Colombo;Hasker P. Davis;Bruce T. Volpe

  • Performance on the Iowa Gambling Task: From 5 to 89 years of age.

    Kevin M. Beitz;Timothy A. Salthouse;Hasker P. Davis

  • Schizophrenia patients demonstrate a dissociation on declarative and non-declarative memory tests

    William Perry;Gregory A. Light;Hasker Davis;David L. Braff

  • Atheistic, agnostic, and religious older adults on well-being and coping behaviors

    Sheena M. Horning;Hasker P. Davis;Michael Stirrat;R. Elisabeth Cornwell

  • Improvement of 8-arm maze performance in aged Fischer 344 rats with 3,4-diaminopyridine.

    Hasker P. Davis;Augusta Idowu;Gary E. Gibson

  • The recognition of facial expressions: an investigation of the influence of age and cognition.

    Sheena M Horning;R Elisabeth Cornwell;Hasker P Davis

  • Age effects on emotion recognition in facial displays: from 20 to 89 years of age.

    Jeffrey T West;Sheena M Horning;Kelli J Klebe;Shannon M Foster

  • Utility of the SLUMS as a Cognitive Screening Tool Among a Nonveteran Sample of Older Adults

    Leilani Feliciano;Sheena M. Horning;Kelli J. Klebe;Sarah L. Anderson

  • Reproductive strategy, sexual development and attraction to facial characteristics.

    R. Elisabeth Cornwell;R. Elisabeth Cornwell;Miriam J Law Smith;Lynda G Boothroyd;Fhionna R Moore

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce T. Volpe
Bruce T. Volpe Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Larry R. Squire
Larry R. Squire University of California, San Diego
David I. Perrett
David I. Perrett University of St Andrews
Timothy A. Salthouse
Timothy A. Salthouse University of Virginia
Julie M. Bugg
Julie M. Bugg Washington University in St. Louis
Benedict C. Jones
Benedict C. Jones University of Strathclyde
Jeff Greenberg
Jeff Greenberg University of Arizona
James L. McClelland
James L. McClelland Stanford University
William Perry
William Perry University of California, San Diego
Julie C. Stout
Julie C. Stout Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to a variety of online degree programs and specialized career pathways. Many students consider counseling as a key focus, which is one of the most in-demand areas in the psychology field. Online degrees in psychology and counseling offer flexibility, allowing students to balance studies with other commitments.

When choosing the right program, location and accreditation are important factors to consider. Those interested in studying in California can refer to the best counseling program rankings in Stockton for top local options. If you are based in Arizona, reviewing the available Tucson counseling degree programs can help guide your decision.

For students in Texas, the best counseling program rankings in Texas provide a streamlined overview of leading colleges and universities. Those considering programs in the Pacific Northwest can explore the best counseling program rankings in Washington for specialized opportunities.

With a degree in psychology or counseling, career options include becoming a licensed counselor, school psychologist, or joining other growing mental health professions. Online degrees make it easier than ever to access quality education and start a meaningful career in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Hasker P. Davis

Recently Published Articles