World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
35
Citations
3828
World Ranking
2729
National Ranking
948

Haibo Dong publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haibo Dong sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 238 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Haibo Dong D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haibo Dong sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • An investigation into minimising total energy consumption and total weighted tardiness in job shops

    Ying Liu;Haibo Dong;Niels Lohse;Sanja Petrovic

  • Computational analysis of vortex dynamics and performance enhancement due to body-fin and fin-fin interactions in fish-like locomotion

    Geng Liu;Yan Ren;Haibo Dong;Otar Akanyeti

  • Hydrodynamic Performance of Aquatic Flapping: Efficiency of Underwater Flight in the Manta

    Frank E. Fish;Christian M. Schreiber;Keith W. Moored;Geng Liu

  • A multi-objective genetic algorithm for optimisation of energy consumption and shop floor production performance

    Ying Liu;Haibo Dong;Niels Lohse;Sanja Petrovic

  • Hydrodynamics of median-fin interactions in fish-like locomotion: Effects of fin shape and movement

    George V. Lauder

  • Vortex dynamics and new lift enhancement mechanism of wing–body interaction in insect forward flight

    Unknown

  • Wing kinematics measurement and aerodynamics of a dragonfly in turning flight

    Unknown

  • Thrust Producing Mechanisms in Ray-inspired Underwater Vehicle Propulsion

    Geng Liu;Yan Ren;Jianzhong Zhu;Hilary Bart-Smith

  • Hydrodynamics of a tandem fish school with asynchronous undulation of individuals

    Unknown

  • Computational investigation of cicada aerodynamics in forward flight

    Unknown

  • Effects of a dynamic trailing-edge flap on the aerodynamic performance and flow structures in hovering flight

    Unknown

  • Computational analysis of hydrodynamic interactions in a high-density fish school

    Unknown

  • Flying in reverse: kinematics and aerodynamics of a dragonfly in backward free flight

    Unknown

  • Tuna locomotion: a computational hydrodynamic analysis of finlet function.

    Junshi Wang;Dylan K. Wainwright;Royce E. Lindengren;George V. Lauder

  • Hydrodynamic Performance of Deformable Fish Fins and Flapping Foils

    M. Bozkurttas;H. Dong;R. Mittal;P. Madden

  • Computational investigation of wing-body interaction and its lift enhancement effect in hummingbird forward flight

    Unknown

  • A balance between aerodynamic and olfactory performance during flight in Drosophila

    Unknown

  • Bio-Inspired Propulsion: Towards Understanding the Role of Pectoral Fin Kinematics in Manta-like Swimming

    Unknown

  • Why do anguilliform swimmers perform undulation with wavelengths shorter than their bodylengths

    Muhammad Saif Ullah Khalid;Muhammad Saif Ullah Khalid;Junshi Wang;Imran Akhtar;Haibo Dong

  • Kinematics and Hydrodynamics of Mobuliform Swimming: Oscillatory Winged Propulsion by Large Pelagic Batoids

    Frank E. Fish;Haibo Dong;Joseph J. Zhu;Hilary Bart-Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Sanja Petrovic
Sanja Petrovic University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, exploring related online degrees can open new career opportunities. For instance, programs like easiest slp masters to get into offer accessible entry points into specialized fields such as speech-language pathology.

Cost is a critical consideration when selecting an online program. Understanding program expenses helps prospective students budget effectively, and resources outlining speech pathology online program cost are valuable for making informed decisions.

Veterans seeking to further their education can benefit from programs designed with their unique needs in mind. Many military-friendly options are available, and guides highlighting military friendly online speech pathology degree programs provide tailored support throughout their academic journey.

For those looking to accelerate their studies, there are effective options such as accelerated speech pathology programs online. These programs enable students to complete their degrees faster while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Haibo Dong

Recently Published Articles