World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Guilherme Ferreira Gomes

Guilherme Ferreira Gomes

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
33
Citations
3544
World Ranking
3072
National Ranking
12

Guilherme Ferreira Gomes publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guilherme Ferreira Gomes sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 114 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 61 scientists 317–326 publications: 69 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 135 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Guilherme Ferreira Gomes D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guilherme Ferreira Gomes sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 125 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 106 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A sunflower optimization (SFO) algorithm applied to damage identification on laminated composite plates

    Unknown

  • A Review of Multi-objective Optimization: Methods and Algorithms in Mechanical Engineering Problems

    Unknown

  • Fault detection and diagnosis in electric motors using 1d convolutional neural networks with multi-channel vibration signals

    Unknown

  • A Review of Vibration Based Inverse Methods for Damage Detection and Identification in Mechanical Structures Using Optimization Algorithms and ANN

    Unknown

  • The use of intelligent computational tools for damage detection and identification with an emphasis on composites – A review

    Unknown

  • A review on the energy absorption response and structural applications of auxetic structures

    Unknown

  • A multiobjective sensor placement optimization for SHM systems considering Fisher information matrix and mode shape interpolation

    Unknown

  • Experimental dynamic analysis of composite sandwich beams with magnetorheological honeycomb core

    Unknown

  • Multi-objective lichtenberg algorithm: A hybrid physics-based meta-heuristic for solving engineering problems

    Unknown

  • A numerical-experimental dynamic analysis of composite sandwich beam with magnetorheological elastomer honeycomb core

    Unknown

  • Tubular auxetic structures: A review

    Unknown

  • Optimized damage identification in CFRP plates by reduced mode shapes and GA-ANN methods

    Unknown

  • A robust optimization for damage detection using multiobjective genetic algorithm, neural network and fuzzy decision making

    Unknown

  • A powerful Lichtenberg Optimization Algorithm: A damage identification case study

    Unknown

  • An efficient two-step damage identification method using sunflower optimization algorithm and mode shape curvature (MSDBI–SFO)

    Unknown

  • Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Electric Motors Using Convolution Neural Network and Short-Time Fourier Transform

    Unknown

  • A numerical–experimental study for structural damage detection in CFRP plates using remote vibration measurements

    Unknown

  • Sensor placement optimization applied to laminated composite plates under vibration

    Unknown

  • Fault classification in three-phase motors based on vibration signal analysis and artificial neural networks

    Unknown

  • Development of an artificial neural network for predicting energy absorption capability of thermoplastic commingled composites

    R.M. Di Benedetto;R.M. Di Benedetto;E.C. Botelho;A. Janotti;A.C. Ancelotti Junior

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While studying Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering offers exciting career opportunities, many students also explore related fields with diverse career paths. For example, degrees like an online applied behavior analysis degree accelerated program provide a faster route into specialized careers focused on behavior science. These programs are designed to suit the pace of working professionals seeking advancement.

Another popular area connected to engineering disciplines is speech pathology and communication sciences. Understanding the speech pathology grad school acceptance rates can help prospective students gauge their chances and prepare accordingly when applying to graduate programs.

Moreover, students interested in these fields often consider programs with flexible admissions. The list of communication sciences and disorders programs highlights those with more accessible entry requirements, making it easier to start a career in speech therapy or related support roles.

Cost is another critical factor. By reviewing online speech pathology degree tuition, students can budget wisely and choose programs that offer the best value without compromising quality.

Recently Published Articles