World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Giovanni Felder

Giovanni Felder

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
52
Citations
8924
World Ranking
978
National Ranking
20

Giovanni Felder publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giovanni Felder sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 140 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Giovanni Felder D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giovanni Felder sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Mathematical Society
  • 2012 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Giovanni Felder is affiliated with ETH Zurich in Switzerland and has an extensive publication record in mathematics and related areas of physics and astronomy. Their research spans several interconnected fields and subfields, focusing on the development and application of mathematical structures, geometry, and theoretical physics concepts.

The main fields of study covered by Felder's work include:

  • Mathematics
  • Physics and Astronomy

Within these areas, more specialized subfields have been the focus of their investigations:

  • Geometry and Topology
  • Mathematical Physics
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Algebra and Number Theory
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics

The key research topics Giovanni Felder has addressed incorporate:

  • Advanced Algebra and Geometry
  • Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
  • Nonlinear Waves and Solitons
  • Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
  • Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Advanced Topics in Algebra
  • Advanced Operator Algebra Research

Among recent scholarly contributions, several papers stand out with detailed publication information:

  • Regularity of the superstring supermeasure and the superperiod map, 2021, Selecta Mathematica
  • The moduli space of stable supercurves and its canonical line bundle, 2023, American Journal of Mathematics
  • Poncelet property and quasi-periodicity of the integrable Boltzmann system, 2021, Letters in Mathematical Physics
  • Singular modules for affine Lie algebras, and applications to irregular WZNW conformal blocks, 2023, Selecta Mathematica
  • Hypergeometric theta functions and elliptic Macdonald polynomials, 2021, UNC Libraries

Felder's publication venues show a concentration in specific academic outlets, reflecting the dissemination channels chosen for their research:

  • UNC Libraries
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Selecta Mathematica
  • American Journal of Mathematics
  • Letters in Mathematical Physics

Collaboration plays a significant role in Felder's work, with several frequent coauthors:

  • Alexander Varchenko
  • David Kazhdan
  • Alexander Polishchuk
  • Gabriele Rembado
  • Rea Dalipi

Their scholarly recognition includes membership in academic societies:

  • Fellow of the American Mathematical Society (2013)
  • Member of Academia Europaea (2012)

Best Publications

  • A Path integral approach to the Kontsevich quantization formula

    Alberto S. Cattaneo;Giovanni Felder

  • BRST approach to minimal models

    Giovanni Felder

  • Fock representations and BRST cohomology in SL (2) current algebra

    Denis Bernard;Giovanni Felder

  • Conformal Field Theory and Integrable Systems Associated to Elliptic Curves

    Giovanni Felder

  • Elliptic quantum groups

    Giovanni Felder

  • Gravity in non-commutative geometry

    Ali H. Chamseddine;Giovanni Felder;J. Frohlich

  • Poisson sigma models and symplectic groupoids

    Alberto S. Cattaneo;Giovanni Felder

  • The geometry of WZW branes

    Giovanni Felder;Jürg Fröhlich;Jürgen Fuchs;Christoph Schweigert

  • Spectra of Wess-Zumino-Witten models with arbitrary simple groups

    G. Felder;K. Gawedzki;A. Kupiainen

  • Relative formality theorem and quantisation of coisotropic submanifolds

    Alberto S. Cattaneo;Giovanni Felder

  • On the AKSZ Formulation of the Poisson Sigma Model

    Alberto S. Cattaneo;Giovanni Felder

  • Correlation functions and boundary conditions in RCFT and three-dimensional topology

    Giovanni Felder;Jürg Fröhlich;Jürgen Fuchs;Christoph Schweigert

  • From local to global deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds

    Alberto S. Cattaneo;Giovanni Felder;Lorenzo Tomassini

  • Grand unification in non-commutative geometry

    Ali H. Chamseddine;Giovanni Felder;J. Frohlich

  • Braid matrices and structure constants for minimal conformal models

    G. Felder;J. Fröhlich;G. Keller

  • The Elliptic Gamma Function and SL(3, Z)⋉Z3

    Giovanni Felder;Alexander Varchenko

  • Coisotropic submanifolds in Poisson geometry and branes in the Poisson sigma model

    Alberto S. Cattaneo;Giovanni Felder

  • Unified gauge theories in non-commutative geometry

    Ali H. Chamseddine;Giovanni Felder;J. Frohlich

  • Algebraic Bethe ansatz for the elliptic quantum group Eτ,η(sl2)

    Giovanni Felder;Alexander Varchenko

  • Conformal blocks on elliptic curves and the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov-Bernard equations

    Giovanni Felder;Christian Wieczerkowski

  • Differential Equations Compatible with KZ Equations

    G. Felder;Y. Markov;V. Tarasov;Alexander Varchenko

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Varchenko
Alexander Varchenko University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Alexander P. Veselov
Alexander P. Veselov Loughborough University
David Kazhdan
David Kazhdan Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Vitaly Tarasov
Vitaly Tarasov Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Jürgen Fuchs
Jürgen Fuchs Karlstad University
Christoph Schweigert
Christoph Schweigert Universität Hamburg
Anton Bovier
Anton Bovier University of Bonn
Antti Kupiainen
Antti Kupiainen University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career options after studying Mathematics in the USA has never been more accessible, especially with numerous online degree offerings. For those interested in advancing their education beyond mathematics, many students consider pursuing an mba transfer credits program. This pathway allows math graduates to leverage their undergraduate credits, accelerating their journey toward an MBA with a business focus.

Another popular option is enrolling in a data analytics master's degree. This degree complements mathematical skills with valuable insights into big data, preparing students for roles in tech, finance, and healthcare sectors.

For students concerned about admission challenges, researching the easiest mba programs to get into can provide guidance on programs with more flexible entry requirements. This can be especially helpful for math graduates aiming to transition into management roles.

Additionally, those wanting flexibility may find value in exploring some of the easy online mba programs. These programs offer convenience and can be completed alongside professional commitments, making them ideal for working students.

Best Scientists Citing Giovanni Felder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles