World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
77
Citations
23468
World Ranking
950
National Ranking
357

Gary M. Lovett publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary M. Lovett sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 145 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Gary M. Lovett D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary M. Lovett sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the Ecological Society of America (ESA)
  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Gary M. Lovett was affiliated with the New York Botanical Garden in the United States. Their research primarily focused on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, contributing significantly across these fields.

Their published work covered various subfields, including ecology, insect science, plant science, global and planetary change, and environmental chemistry. Key topics explored in their research comprised forest insect ecology and management, peatlands and wetlands ecology, plant responses to elevated CO2, soil and water nutrient dynamics, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, lichen and fungal ecology, and forest management and policy.

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Gary M. Lovett were:

  • The impact of air pollution on terrestrial managed and natural vegetation, 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • Insect and Disease Disturbances Correlate With Reduced Carbon Sequestration in Forests of the Contiguous United States, 2021, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
  • Depth patterns and connections between gross nitrogen cycling and soil exoenzyme activities in three northern hardwood forests, 2020, Soil Biology and Biochemistry
  • Watershed studies at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest: Building on a long legacy of research with new approaches and sources of data, 2020, Hydrological Processes
  • The Global Forest Health Crisis: A Public-Good Social Dilemma in Need of International Collective Action, 2023, Annual Review of Phytopathology

Frequent coauthors included Charles T. Driscoll, Christopher M. Clark, Peter M. Groffman, Emma J. Rosi, and Michael L. Pace.

Gary M. Lovett published regularly in venues such as Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, Hydrological Processes, Annual Review of Phytopathology, and Soil Biology and Biochemistry.

Throughout their career, Gary M. Lovett received several recognitions, including being named a Fellow of the Ecological Society of America in 2020 and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems

    Aaron M. Ellison;Michael S. Bank;Barton D. Clinton;Elizabeth A. Colburn

  • Reconciling carbon-cycle concepts, terminology, and methods

    F. S. Chapin Iii;G. M. Woodwell;J. Randerson;E. B. Rastetter

  • Who needs environmental monitoring

    Gary M. Lovett;Douglas A. Burns;Charles T. Driscoll;Jennifer C. Jenkins

  • Atmospheric deposition and canopy interactions of major ions in a forest.

    S. E. Lindberg;G. M. Lovett;D. D. Richter;D. W. Johnson

  • Belowground ectomycorrhizal fungal community change over a nitrogen deposition gradient in Alaska

    Erik A. Lilleskov;Timothy J. Fahey;Thomas R. Horton;Gary M. Lovett

  • The biogeochemistry of calcium at Hubbard Brook

    G.E. Likens;C.T. Driscoll;D.C. Buso;T.G. Siccama

  • Forest Ecosystem Responses to Exotic Pests and Pathogens in Eastern North America

    Gary M. Lovett;Charles D. Canham;Mary A. Arthur;Kathleen C. Weathers

  • Atmospheric Deposition of Nutrients and Pollutants in North America: An Ecological Perspective

    Gary M. Lovett

  • Nitrogen cycling in a northern hardwood forest: Do species matter?

    Gary M. Lovett;Kathleen C. Weathers;Mary A. Arthur;Jack C. Schultz

  • Dry deposition and canopy exchange in a mixed oak forest as determined by analysis of throughfall

    G. M. Lovett;S. E. Lindberg

  • Cloud Droplet Deposition in Subalpine Balsam Fir Forests: Hydrological and Chemical Inputs

    Gary M. Lovett;William A. Reiners;Richard K. Olson

  • A Spatial Model of Atmospheric Deposition for the Northeastern U.S.

    Scott V. Ollinger;John D. Aber;Gary M. Lovett;Sarah E. Millham

  • Atmospheric deposition and canopy interactions of nitrogen in forests

    Gary M. Lovett;Steven E. Lindberg

  • Nonnative forest insects and pathogens in the United States: Impacts and policy options.

    Gary M. Lovett;Marissa S. Weiss;Andrew M. Liebhold;Thomas P. Holmes

  • Long-term sodium chloride retention in a rural watershed: legacy effects of road salt on streamwater concentration.

    Victoria R. Kelly;Gary M. Lovett;Kathleen C. Weathers;Stuart E. G. Findlay

  • Control of Nitrogen Loss from Forested Watersheds by Soil Carbon:Nitrogen Ratio and Tree Species Composition

    Gary M. Lovett;Kathleen C. Weathers;Mary A. Arthur

  • Atmospheric deposition to oak forests along an urban - rural gradient.

    Gary M. Lovett;Martin M. Traynor;Richard V. Pouyat;Margaret M. Carreiro

  • A New Conceptual Model of Nitrogen Saturation Based on Experimental Nitrogen Addition to an Oak Forest

    Gary M. Lovett;Christine L. Goodale

  • Rates and mechanisms of cloud water deposition to a subalpine balsam fir forest

    Gary M. Lovett

  • Biomass allocation and multiple resource limitation in tree seedlings

    C. D. Canham;A. R. Berkowitz;V. R. Kelly;Gary M. Lovett

Frequent Co-Authors

Kathleen C. Weathers
Kathleen C. Weathers Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Gene E. Likens
Gene E. Likens University of Connecticut
Charles T. Driscoll
Charles T. Driscoll Syracuse University
William A. Reiners
William A. Reiners University of Wyoming
Douglas A. Burns
Douglas A. Burns United States Geological Survey
Myron J. Mitchell
Myron J. Mitchell SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry
Clive G. Jones
Clive G. Jones Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Dale W. Johnson
Dale W. Johnson University of Nevada Reno
Scott V. Ollinger
Scott V. Ollinger University of New Hampshire
Mary A. Arthur
Mary A. Arthur University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse career options, both scientific and interdisciplinary. Many students from non-traditional backgrounds are interested in this field. For those considering a switch, online bridge programs non-SLP majors highlight how customized pathways exist for moving into specialized career tracks—even from unrelated majors.

Flexibility and affordability are important for many students. Environmental and biological sciences now offer a variety of online degree programs. Similar to nursing, where students seek the cheapest online accelerated bsn programs, ecology students can benefit from fully online or hybrid formats designed to fit busy schedules.

Advanced degrees in science and healthcare can significantly impact earning potential. The pmhnp salary by state report is a great resource for understanding how location and specialization affect professional outcomes—insights that also apply to fields like environmental science.

Finally, many students wonder about educational timelines. Whether switching fields or advancing your qualifications, it’s wise to know how long to become nurse practitioner; similar principles apply when mapping out pathways in ecology and evolution, helping you plan your academic journey efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Gary M. Lovett

Recently Published Articles