World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
62
Citations
14312
World Ranking
2971
National Ranking
1298

Franklin W. Stahl publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franklin W. Stahl sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 140 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Franklin W. Stahl D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franklin W. Stahl sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1985 - Fellow of the MacArthur Foundation
  • 1985 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 1982 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1976 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1975 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Franklin W. Stahl is affiliated with the University of Oregon in the United States. Their recent research includes a publication titled Crossover Interference on Nucleolus Organizing Region-Bearing Chromosomes in Arabidopsis, published in 2021 at UNC Libraries.

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Sandy Y. Lam
  • Sarah R. Horn
  • Sarah J. Radford
  • Elizabeth A. Housworth
  • Gregory P. Copenhaver

The primary venue for Stahl's recent publication is UNC Libraries.

Throughout their career, Stahl has received multiple recognitions:

  • Fellow of the MacArthur Foundation (1985)
  • Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation (twice, 1975 and 1985)
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1982)
  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences (1976)

These honors reflect longstanding engagement with scientific research communities.

Best Publications

  • The double-strand-break repair model for recombination

    Jack W. Szostak;Terry L. Orr-Weaver;Rodney J. Rothstein;Franklin W. Stahl

  • The replication of DNA in Escherichia coli

    Matthew Meselson;Franklin W. Stahl

  • EQUILIBRIUM SEDIMENTATION OF MACROMOLECULES IN DENSITY GRADIENTS.

    Matthew Meselson;Franklin W. Stahl;Jerome Vinograd

  • Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance.

    E Foss;R Lande;F W Stahl;C M Steinberg

  • Rec-mediated recombinational hot spot activity in bacteriophage lambda. II. A mutation which causes hot spot activity.

    Stephen T. Lam;Mary M. Stahl;Kenneth D. McMilin;Franklin W. Stahl

  • DNA double-chain breaks in recombination of phage lambda and of yeast.

    David S. Thaler;Franklin W. Stahl

  • chi and the RecBC D Enzyme of Escherichia Coli

    Richard S. Myers;Franklin W. Stahl

  • Rec-mediated recombinational hot spot activity in bacteriophage lambda. III. Chi mutations are site-mutations stimulating rec-mediated recombination

    Franklin W. Stahl;Jean M. Crasemann;Mary M. Stahl

  • Crossover interference in Arabidopsis.

    G. P. Copenhaver;E. A. Housworth;F. W. Stahl

  • Bacterial genetics. A unicorn in the garden.

    Franklin W. Stahl

  • Special Sites in Generalized Recombination

    Franklin W. Stahl

  • A test of the double-strand break repair model for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    Larry A. Gilbertson;Franklin W. Stahl

  • Chi sites in combination with RecA protein increase the survival of linear DNA in Escherichia coli by inactivating exoV activity of RecBCD nuclease.

    A. Kuzminov;E. Schabtach;F.W. Stahl

  • Genetic Control of Recombination Partner Preference in Yeast Meiosis: Isolation and Characterization of Mutants Elevated for Meiotic Unequal Sister-Chromatid Recombination

    Dawn A. Thompson;Franklin W. Stahl

  • RECOMBINATION PATHWAY SPECIFICITY OF CHI

    Franklin W. Stahl;Mary M. Stahl

  • Annealing Vs. Invasion in Phage λ Recombination

    Mary M. Stahl;Lynn Thomason;Anthony R. Poteete;Trudee Tarkowski

  • Does crossover interference count in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Franklin W. Stahl;Henriette M. Foss;Lisa S. Young;Rhona H. Borts

  • Genetic recombination : thinking about it in phage and fungi

    Franklin W. Stahl

  • Double-strand end repair via the RecBC pathway in Escherichia coli primes DNA replication

    Andrei Kuzminov;Franklin W. Stahl

  • Crossover interference in humans.

    E.A. Housworth;F.W. Stahl

Frequent Co-Authors

Ichizo Kobayashi
Ichizo Kobayashi University of Tokyo
Gregory P. Copenhaver
Gregory P. Copenhaver University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Matthew Meselson
Matthew Meselson Harvard University
Russell Lande
Russell Lande Imperial College London
David Dubnau
David Dubnau Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Susan M. Rosenberg
Susan M. Rosenberg Baylor College of Medicine
Rodney Rothstein
Rodney Rothstein Columbia University
Ira Herskowitz
Ira Herskowitz University of California, San Francisco
Richard P. Novick
Richard P. Novick New York University
James E. Haber
James E. Haber Brandeis University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in genetics, a range of allied online degrees and accelerated career pathways are available in the healthcare field. Many students start their journey with broad healthcare training, such as medical assistant training, which offers a fast-tracked entry into clinical settings—sometimes in just six weeks.

For nurses who want to advance their education without extensive clinical requirements, top programs are highlighted in the list of the best online rn to bsn programs. Those pursuing further specialization can benefit from accelerated options like the 1 year dnp program online, allowing for rapid progress toward advanced practice or leadership roles in nursing and genetics research.

Cost is a common concern, and those looking for budget-friendly routes to doctoral-level nursing credentials should review the cheapest msn to dnp programs. Exploring these pathways helps students build a solid foundation for careers in genetics, whether in direct patient care, research, or healthcare leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Franklin W. Stahl

Recently Published Articles