World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
49
Citations
17356
World Ranking
17818
National Ranking
1407

Fiona E. Guinness publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fiona E. Guinness sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 61 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Fiona E. Guinness D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fiona E. Guinness sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fiona E. Guinness is a researcher affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their work spans multiple fields including Environmental Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on specialized subfields such as Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, and Genetics.

The scientist's research interests cover key topics including Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Amphibian and Reptile Biology, and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock. These topics reflect a diverse engagement with both ecological systems and genetic studies related to animal biology.

Among their recent publications is the paper titled What do rates of deposition of dental cementum tell us? Functional and evolutionary hypotheses in red deer, published in 2020 in the journal PLoS ONE. This study has accumulated citations, demonstrating engagement from the scientific community.

  • What do rates of deposition of dental cementum tell us? Functional and evolutionary hypotheses in red deer (2020, PLoS ONE)

Fiona E. Guinness frequently collaborates with several co-authors across their research efforts. Notable collaborators include:

  • F. Javier Pérez-Barbería
  • María López-Quintanilla
  • Andrés J. García
  • Laureano Gallego
  • Jamil Cappelli

PLoS ONE represents the primary venue for their scholarly publications, indicating a preference or a strong presence in this open-access multidisciplinary journal.

In summary, Fiona E. Guinness's academic contributions intersect multiple biological and environmental domains, explored through collaborative efforts and published research focused on both molecular and ecological perspectives.

Best Publications

  • Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes

    T. H. Clutton-Brock;F. E. Guinness;S. D. Albon

  • The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer ( Cervus elaphus L.)

    T.H. Clutton-Brock;S.D. Albon;R.M. Gibson;F.E. Guinness

  • Parental investment and sex differences in juvenile mortality in birds and mammals

    T. H. Clutton-Brock;S. D. Albon;F. E. Guinness

  • Fitness costs of gestation and lactation in wild mammals.

    T. H. Clutton-Brock;S. D. Albon;F. E. Guinness

  • Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex ratios in red deer.

    T. H. Clutton-Brock;S. D. Albon;F. E. Guinness

  • ANTLER SIZE IN RED DEER: HERITABILITY AND SELECTION BUT NO EVOLUTION

    Loeske E. B. Kruuk;Loeske E. B. Kruuk;Jon Slate;Josephine M. Pemberton;Sue Brotherstone

  • Heritability of fitness in a wild mammal population.

    Loeske E. B. Kruuk;Tim H. Clutton-Brock;Jon Slate;Josephine M. Pemberton

  • Early development and population dynamics in red deer. II: Density-independent effects and cohort variation

    S. D. Albon;T. H. Clutton-Brock;F. E. Guinness

  • Microsatellites reveal heterosis in red deer

    T. N Coulson;J. M Pemberton;S. D Albon;M Beaumont

  • Population density affects sex ratio variation in red deer

    Loeske E. B. Kruuk;Loeske E. B. Kruuk;Tim H. Clutton-Brock;Steve D. Albon;Josephine M. Pemberton

  • Early development and population dynamics in red deer. I: Density-dependent effects on juvenile survival

    T. H. Clutton-Brock;M. Major;S. D. Albon;F. E. Guinness

  • Great expectations: dominance, breeding success and offspring sex ratios in red deer

    T.H. Clutton-Brock;S.D. Albon;F.E. Guinness

  • The Costs of Reproduction to Red Deer Hinds

    T. H. Clutton-Brock;F. E. Guinness;S. D. Albon

  • Sexual segregation and density-related changes in habitat use in male and female Red deer (Cerrus elaphus)

    T. H. Clutton‐Brock;G. R. Iason;F. E. Guinness

  • Population regulation in male and female red deer

    T. H. Clutton-Brock;M. Major;F. E. Guinness

  • Parental investment in male and female offspring in polygynous mammals

    T. H. Clutton-Brock;S. D. Albon;F. E. Guinness

  • Factors affecting calf mortality in red deer (Cervus elaphus)

    F. E. Guinness;T. H. Clutton-Brock;S. D. Albon

  • Behavioral estimates of male mating success tested by DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal

    J.M. Pemberton;S.D. Albon;F.E. Guinness;T. H. Clutton-Brock

  • Density-related changes in sexual selection in red deer.

    T. H. Clutton-Brock;K. E. Rose;F. E. Guinness

  • Early determinants of lifetime reproductive success differ between the sexes in red deer.

    L. E. B. Kruuk;L. E. B. Kruuk;T. H. Clutton-Brock;K. E. Rose;F. E. Guinness

Frequent Co-Authors

Tim H. Clutton-Brock
Tim H. Clutton-Brock University of Cambridge
Steve D. Albon
Steve D. Albon James Hutton Institute
Josephine M. Pemberton
Josephine M. Pemberton University of Edinburgh
Loeske E. B. Kruuk
Loeske E. B. Kruuk University of Edinburgh
Tim Coulson
Tim Coulson University of Oxford
Jon Slate
Jon Slate University of Sheffield
Daniel H. Nussey
Daniel H. Nussey University of Edinburgh
F. J. Perez-Barberia
F. J. Perez-Barberia University of Oviedo
Glenn R. Iason
Glenn R. Iason James Hutton Institute
Laureano Gallego
Laureano Gallego University of Castilla-La Mancha

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a wide range of rewarding careers. Today, many students are turning to flexible learning options, including online biology degrees. These programs allow learners to study core topics in genetics, ecology, and molecular biology from anywhere, making higher education more accessible than ever.

For those interested in healthcare, registered nurse online programs offer a pathway to a vital and in-demand profession. Nursing blends biological sciences with patient care, and online formats help working adults or career-changers quickly gain essential skills.

Nutrition is another growing field related to biochemistry studies. Accredited online nutrition degrees provide a solid science foundation while preparing graduates for roles in public health, wellness, and clinical practice.

Finally, for those aiming to lead in healthcare administration, cahme accredited mha programs combine biology knowledge with essential management skills. These degrees are ideal for students seeking leadership careers in hospitals, research centers, or health policy.

Best Scientists Citing Fiona E. Guinness

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles