World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
33
Citations
3504
World Ranking
3079
National Ranking
9

Erin Elizabeth Bachynski publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erin Elizabeth Bachynski sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 150 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Erin Elizabeth Bachynski D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erin Elizabeth Bachynski sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Design considerations for tension leg platform wind turbines

    Erin E. Bachynski;Torgeir Moan

  • Effects of hydrodynamic modelling in fully coupled simulations of a semi-submersible wind turbine

    Marit I. Kvittem;Erin E. Bachynski;Torgeir Moan

  • Real-Time Hybrid Model Testing of a Braceless Semi-Submersible Wind Turbine: Part I — The Hybrid Approach

    Unknown

  • Wind-wave misalignment effects on floating wind turbines: motions and tower load effects

    Erin Elizabeth Bachynski;Marit Irene Kvittem;Chenyu Luan;Torgeir Moan

  • Global Analysis of Floating Wind Turbines: Code Development, Model Sensitivity And Benchmark Study

    Unknown

  • OC6 Phase I: Investigating the underprediction of low-frequency hydrodynamic loads and responses of a floating wind turbine

    A N Robertson;S Gueydon;E Bachynski;L Wang

  • Wake meandering effects on floating wind turbines

    Unknown

  • Integrated design optimization of spar floating wind turbines

    John Marius Hegseth;Erin E. Bachynski;Joaquim R.R.A. Martins

  • Dynamic Analysis of Floating Wind Turbines During Pitch Actuator Fault, Grid Loss, and Shutdown☆

    Erin Elizabeth Bachynski;Mahmoud Etemaddar;Marit Irene Kvittem;Chenyu Luan

  • Real-time hybrid model testing of a braceless semi-submersible wind turbine. Part II: Experimental results

    Unknown

  • Stochastic dynamic load effect and fatigue damage analysis of drivetrains in land-based and TLP, spar and semi-submersible floating wind turbines☆

    Amir Rasekhi Nejad;Erin Elizabeth Bachynski;Marit Irene Kvittem;Marit Irene Kvittem;Chenyu Luan

  • Analysis and optimization of a tethered wave energy converter in irregular waves

    Erin E. Bachynski;Yin Lu Young;Ronald W. Yeung

  • Design and fatigue analysis of monopile foundations to support the DTU 10 MW offshore wind turbine

    Unknown

  • Review of scaling laws applied to floating offshore wind turbines

    Unknown

  • Design and Dynamic Analysis of Tension Leg Platform Wind Turbines

    Unknown

  • Comparison of wave load effects on a TLP wind turbine by using computational fluid dynamics and potential flow theory approaches

    Ali Nematbakhsh;Erin Elizabeth Bachynski;Zhen Gao;Torgeir Moan

  • Real-time Hybrid Model Testing of Floating Wind Turbines: Sensitivity to Limited Actuation

    Unknown

  • Total experimental uncertainty in hydrodynamic testing of a semisubmersible wind turbine, considering numerical propagation of systematic uncertainty

    Unknown

  • A semi-analytical frequency domain model for efficient design evaluation of spar floating wind turbines

    Unknown

  • OC5 Project Phase Ib: Validation of Hydrodynamic Loading on a Fixed, Flexible Cylinder for Offshore Wind Applications

    Amy N. Robertson;Fabian Wendt;Jason M. Jonkman;Wojciech Popko

Frequent Co-Authors

Torgeir Moan
Torgeir Moan Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Zhen Gao
Zhen Gao Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Jason Jonkman
Jason Jonkman National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Asgeir J. Sørensen
Asgeir J. Sørensen Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Yin Lu Young
Yin Lu Young University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Joaquim R. R. A. Martins
Joaquim R. R. A. Martins University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens doors to various related fields. For those interested in healthcare communication, accelerated speech pathology programs offer a fast-tracked pathway to becoming a speech therapist, complementing engineering skills with patient care.

Another unique career avenue linked to technical and analytical skills is becoming an FBI profiler. This role involves applying problem-solving and investigative techniques, ideal for engineers wanting to transition into law enforcement or criminal psychology.

For those drawn to helping others and interested in mental health, exploring different types of counseling degrees can help clarify which specialization aligns best with career goals. Counseling skills can augment leadership and teamwork abilities gained from engineering studies.

Many institutions offer flexible options like the best easiest counseling degree programs, which are designed for learners seeking an accessible entry into the counseling field. These programs can provide valuable certifications for interdisciplinary career development.

Best Scientists Citing Erin Elizabeth Bachynski

Recently Published Articles