World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 33 3079 2895 9 9 150 3504

Erin Elizabeth Bachynski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Erin Elizabeth Bachynski between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Erin Elizabeth Bachynski published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2022. 32 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2022. 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 8 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 16 publications
2010 2025

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Erin Elizabeth Bachynski: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 1
2011 1
2012 8
2013 3
2014 6
2015 9
2016 9
2017 13
2018 11
2019 16
2020 17
2021 17
2022 20
2023 14
2024 16
2025 16
Total 177
Download as CSV

Erin Elizabeth Bachynski publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erin Elizabeth Bachynski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 147–156 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 150 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155 150
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Erin Elizabeth Bachynski D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erin Elizabeth Bachynski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153 33
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Design considerations for tension leg platform wind turbines

    Erin E. Bachynski;Torgeir Moan

  • Effects of hydrodynamic modelling in fully coupled simulations of a semi-submersible wind turbine

    Marit I. Kvittem;Erin E. Bachynski;Torgeir Moan

  • Real-Time Hybrid Model Testing of a Braceless Semi-Submersible Wind Turbine: Part I — The Hybrid Approach

    Unknown

  • Wind-wave misalignment effects on floating wind turbines: motions and tower load effects

    Erin Elizabeth Bachynski;Marit Irene Kvittem;Chenyu Luan;Torgeir Moan

  • Global Analysis of Floating Wind Turbines: Code Development, Model Sensitivity And Benchmark Study

    Unknown

  • OC6 Phase I: Investigating the underprediction of low-frequency hydrodynamic loads and responses of a floating wind turbine

    A N Robertson;S Gueydon;E Bachynski;L Wang

  • Wake meandering effects on floating wind turbines

    Unknown

  • Integrated design optimization of spar floating wind turbines

    John Marius Hegseth;Erin E. Bachynski;Joaquim R.R.A. Martins

  • Dynamic Analysis of Floating Wind Turbines During Pitch Actuator Fault, Grid Loss, and Shutdown☆

    Erin Elizabeth Bachynski;Mahmoud Etemaddar;Marit Irene Kvittem;Chenyu Luan

  • Real-time hybrid model testing of a braceless semi-submersible wind turbine. Part II: Experimental results

    Unknown

  • Stochastic dynamic load effect and fatigue damage analysis of drivetrains in land-based and TLP, spar and semi-submersible floating wind turbines☆

    Amir Rasekhi Nejad;Erin Elizabeth Bachynski;Marit Irene Kvittem;Marit Irene Kvittem;Chenyu Luan

  • Analysis and optimization of a tethered wave energy converter in irregular waves

    Erin E. Bachynski;Yin Lu Young;Ronald W. Yeung

  • Design and fatigue analysis of monopile foundations to support the DTU 10 MW offshore wind turbine

    Unknown

  • Review of scaling laws applied to floating offshore wind turbines

    Unknown

  • Design and Dynamic Analysis of Tension Leg Platform Wind Turbines

    Unknown

  • Comparison of wave load effects on a TLP wind turbine by using computational fluid dynamics and potential flow theory approaches

    Ali Nematbakhsh;Erin Elizabeth Bachynski;Zhen Gao;Torgeir Moan

  • Real-time Hybrid Model Testing of Floating Wind Turbines: Sensitivity to Limited Actuation

    Unknown

  • Total experimental uncertainty in hydrodynamic testing of a semisubmersible wind turbine, considering numerical propagation of systematic uncertainty

    Unknown

  • A semi-analytical frequency domain model for efficient design evaluation of spar floating wind turbines

    Unknown

  • OC5 Project Phase Ib: Validation of Hydrodynamic Loading on a Fixed, Flexible Cylinder for Offshore Wind Applications

    Amy N. Robertson;Fabian Wendt;Jason M. Jonkman;Wojciech Popko

Frequent Co-Authors

Torgeir Moan
Torgeir Moan Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Zhen Gao
Zhen Gao Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Jason Jonkman
Jason Jonkman National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Asgeir J. Sørensen
Asgeir J. Sørensen Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Yin Lu Young
Yin Lu Young University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Joaquim R. R. A. Martins
Joaquim R. R. A. Martins University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens doors to various related fields. For those interested in healthcare communication, accelerated speech pathology programs offer a fast-tracked pathway to becoming a speech therapist, complementing engineering skills with patient care.

Another unique career avenue linked to technical and analytical skills is becoming an FBI profiler. This role involves applying problem-solving and investigative techniques, ideal for engineers wanting to transition into law enforcement or criminal psychology.

For those drawn to helping others and interested in mental health, exploring different types of counseling degrees can help clarify which specialization aligns best with career goals. Counseling skills can augment leadership and teamwork abilities gained from engineering studies.

Many institutions offer flexible options like the best easiest counseling degree programs, which are designed for learners seeking an accessible entry into the counseling field. These programs can provide valuable certifications for interdisciplinary career development.

Best Scientists Citing Erin Elizabeth Bachynski

Recently Published Articles