World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6039 3278 68 15668

Eric Zarahn publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eric Zarahn between 1996 and 2011, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eric Zarahn published across 16 years, from 1996 to 2011, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 1998. 2 of the 77 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2011. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 1998. 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications
1996 2011

77 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eric Zarahn: publications per year, 1996 to 2011
Year Publications
1996 6
1997 4
1998 11
1999 5
2000 6
2001 3
2002 4
2003 9
2004 10
2005 4
2006 4
2007 2
2008 5
2009 2
2010 0
2011 2
Total 77
Download as CSV

Eric Zarahn publications per year - data summary

  • Eric Zarahn, a Psychology scholar from Columbia University, has 77 publications recorded across 16 years, from 1996 to 2011.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1996 and the most recent to 2011.
  • The most productive year is 1998, with 11 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2007, 2009 and 2011, with 2 publications each.
  • 1 of the 16 years in the span carries no publications at all (2010).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.1 per year counting only the 15 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2007-2011) hold 11 publications, 14% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1996-2001: 35 publications (5.8 per year); 2002-2007: 33 publications (5.5 per year); 2008-2011: 9 publications (2.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Eric Zarahn publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Zarahn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 68 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 68
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Eric Zarahn publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Eric Zarahn, a Psychology scholar from Columbia University, records 68 publications - the 4th percentile of the discipline.
  • 4% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Eric Zarahn, and about 96% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Eric Zarahn ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Eric Zarahn D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Zarahn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Eric Zarahn D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Eric Zarahn, a Psychology scholar from Columbia University, records 47 D-Index - the 47th percentile of the discipline.
  • 47% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Eric Zarahn, and about 53% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Eric Zarahn ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Eric Zarahn is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects engagement within their institutional context, though specific research topics, publication records, and fields of study are not detailed.

There is no available data on their recent papers, frequent co-authors, venues for publication, or book publications. Likewise, information on their main fields, subfields of study, or main topics of work has not been provided.

No awards or honors are listed in connection with Eric Zarahn, and there is no indication that they are deceased.

The absence of publicly available bibliometric data suggests that Eric Zarahn might focus on work that is either not extensively indexed in common academic databases or that their contributions might be emerging or specialized without high visibility in conventional metrics.

Best Publications

  • Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation

    Janine Reis;Heidi M. Schambra;Leonardo G. Cohen;Ethan R. Buch

  • Functional MRI studies of spatial and nonspatial working memory.

    M D'Esposito;G.K Aguirre;E Zarahn;D Ballard

  • Inter-individual Variability in the Capacity for Motor Recovery After Ischemic Stroke:

    Shyam Prabhakaran;Eric Zarahn;Claire Riley;Allison Speizer

  • Adolescent immaturity in attention-related brain engagement to emotional facial expressions

    Christopher S Monk;Erin B McClure;Eric E Nelson;Eric Zarahn

  • The effect of normal aging on the coupling of neural activity to the bold hemodynamic response.

    Mark D'Esposito;Eric Zarahn;Geoffrey K. Aguirre;Bart Rypma

  • An area within human ventral cortex sensitive to Building stimuli: Evidence and implications

    Geoffrey K Aguirre;E Zarahn;M D’Esposito

  • A Trial-Based Experimental Design for fMRI

    Eric Zarahn;Geoff Aguirre;Mark D'Esposito

  • Choice selection and reward anticipation: an fMRI study.

    Monique Ernst;Eric E. Nelson;Erin B. McClure;Christopher S. Monk

  • Experimental Design and the Relative Sensitivity of BOLD and Perfusion fMRI

    Geoffrey Karl Aguirre;John A. Detre;Eric Zarahn;David C. Alsop

  • A developmental examination of gender differences in brain engagement during evaluation of threat

    Erin B McClure;Christopher S Monk;Eric E Nelson;Eric Zarahn

  • Association of Life Activities With Cerebral Blood Flow in Alzheimer Disease: Implications for the Cognitive Reserve Hypothesis

    Nikolaos Scarmeas;Eric Zarahn;Karen E. Anderson;Christian G. Habeck

  • Functional MRI lateralization of memory in temporal lobe epilepsy

    J. A. Detre;L. Maccotta;D. King;D. C. Alsop

  • Event-related functional MRI: Implications for cognitive psychology.

    Mark D'Esposito;Eric Zarahn;Geoffrey K. Aguirre

  • Using event-related fMRI to assess delay-period activity during performance of spatial and nonspatial working memory tasks.

    Bradley R. Postle;Eric Zarahn;Mark D'Esposito

  • Age-related changes in brain activation during a delayed item recognition task.

    Eric Zarahn;Brian C. Rakitin;Diane Abela;Joseph Flynn

  • An event-related fMRI study of the neurobehavioral impact of sleep deprivation on performance of a delayed-match-to-sample task.

    Christian G. Habeck;Brian C. Rakitin;James R. Moeller;Nikolaos Scarmeas

  • Exploring the neural basis of cognitive reserve.

    Yaakov Stern;Eric Zarahn;John Hilton;Joseph Flynn

  • Neural components of topographical representation

    Geoffrey K. Aguirre;Eric Zarahn;Mark D’Esposito

  • Cognitive Reserve Modulates Functional Brain Responses During Memory Tasks: A Pet Study in Healthy Young and Elderly Subjects

    Nikolaos Scarmeas;Eric Zarahn;Karen E. Anderson;H. John Hilton

  • Explaining Savings for Visuomotor Adaptation: Linear Time-Invariant State-Space Models Are Not Sufficient

    Eric Zarahn;Gregory D. Weston;Johnny Liang;Pietro Mazzoni

  • Human prefrontal cortex is not specific for working memory: a functional MRI study.

    M. D'Esposito;D. Ballard;G.K. Aguirre;E. Zarahn

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark D'Esposito
Mark D'Esposito University of California, Berkeley
Yaakov Stern
Yaakov Stern Columbia University
Geoffrey K. Aguirre
Geoffrey K. Aguirre University of Pennsylvania
Christian G. Habeck
Christian G. Habeck Columbia University
Nikolaos Scarmeas
Nikolaos Scarmeas National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
John A. Detre
John A. Detre University of Pennsylvania
Daniel S. Pine
Daniel S. Pine National Institutes of Health
David C. Alsop
David C. Alsop Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
John W. Krakauer
John W. Krakauer Johns Hopkins University
Robert M. Bilder
Robert M. Bilder University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens up a wide variety of online options and rewarding career possibilities. Many students pursue advanced study to become specialists, such as Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs), who work with individuals on behavior interventions and applied behavior analysis.

Each state and city has specific pathways for certification and employment. For example, if you’re interested in working as a BCBA in Massachusetts, it’s important to understand Boston bcba requirements. Similarly, aspiring professionals in New York should review the bcba certification requirements in Buffalo, as the process can differ by region.

Prospective students in other parts of the country will find unique requirements too. Those looking to practice in Arizona can see the steps outlined in how to become a bcba in Chandler. For those interested in North Carolina, learning how to become a bcba in Charlotte provides city-specific guidance.

By exploring online degree options and understanding local certification requirements, you can map out a successful career in psychology—whether as a BCBA or in other specialized roles supporting mental health and behavioral needs.

Best Scientists Citing Eric Zarahn

Recently Published Articles