World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
43
Citations
8289
World Ranking
5264
National Ranking
1801

Eric E. Knapp publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric E. Knapp sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 85 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Eric E. Knapp D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric E. Knapp sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric E. Knapp is a researcher affiliated with the US Forest Service in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions across several subfields including global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, ecology, safety, risk, reliability and quality, and atmospheric science.

The research topics Knapp has extensively covered include:

  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Rangeland and wildlife management
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Ecology and vegetation dynamics studies
  • Plant water relations and carbon dynamics
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Fire dynamics and safety research

Knapp has published frequently in several venues, most notably the Forest Service Research Data Archive, which houses seven of their works. Additional publications appear in Forest Ecology and Management (four publications), Fire Ecology (three publications), Ecological Applications, and the Journal of Forestry.

Noteworthy recent papers authored or co-authored by Eric E. Knapp include:

  • "Variable thinning and prescribed fire influence tree mortality and growth during and after a severe drought," 2020, published in Forest Ecology and Management
  • "Housing arrangement and vegetation factors associated with single-family home survival in the 2018 Camp Fire, California," 2021, published in Fire Ecology
  • "Evidence for widespread changes in the structure, composition, and fire regimes of western North American forests," 2021, published in Ecological Applications
  • "Pyrosilviculture Needed for Landscape Resilience of Dry Western United States Forests," 2021, published in Journal of Forestry
  • "Land management explains major trends in forest structure and composition over the last millennium in California's Klamath Mountains," 2022, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent co-authors of Knapp include Emily G. Brodie and Sarah M. Bisbing, each of whom has collaborated on five publications. Other regular collaborators are Scott L. Stephens, Malcolm P. North, and Hugh D. Safford, with three co-authored works each.

Best Publications

  • Prescribed fire in North American forests and woodlands: history, current practice, and challenges

    Kevin C Ryan;Eric E Knapp;J Morgan Varner

  • Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western U.S. forests

    Scott L. Stephens;Jason J. Moghaddas;Carl Edminster;Carl E. Fiedler

  • Calibration and validation of the relative differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (RdNBR) to three measures of fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Klamath Mountains, California, USA

    Jay D. Miller;Eric E. Knapp;Carl H. Key;Carl N. Skinner

  • Drought, tree mortality, and wildfire in forests adapted to frequent fire

    Scott L Stephens;Brandon M Collins;Christopher J Fettig;Mark A Finney

  • Evidence for widespread changes in the structure, composition, and fire regimes of western North American forests.

    R. K. Hagmann;P. F. Hessburg;P. F. Hessburg;S. J. Prichard;N. A. Povak

  • Ecological Effects of Prescribed Fire Season: A Literature Review and Synthesis for Managers

    Eric E. Knapp;Becky L. Estes;Carl N. Skinner

  • The national Fire and Fire Surrogate study: effects of fuel reduction methods on forest vegetation structure and fuels

    Dylan W. Schwilk;Dylan W. Schwilk;Jon E. Keeley;Eric E. Knapp;James McIver

  • Climatic stress increases forest fire severity across the western United States

    Phillip J. van Mantgem;Jonathan C. B. Nesmith;MaryBeth Keifer;Eric E. Knapp

  • Trends and causes of severity, size, and number of fires in northwestern California, USA

    J. D. Miller;Carl Skinner;H. D. Safford;H. D. Safford;Eric E. Knapp

  • Fuel reduction and coarse woody debris dynamics with early season and late season prescribed fire in a Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest

    Eric E. Knapp;Jon E. Keeley;Elizabeth A. Ballenger;Teresa J. Brennan

  • Pollen-limited reproduction in blue oak: implications for wind pollination in fragmented populations

    Eric E. Knapp;Michael A. Goedde;Kevin J. Rice

  • Quantifying spatial patterns of tree groups and gaps in mixed-conifer forests: Reference conditions and long-term changes following fire suppression and logging

    Jamie M. Lydersen;Malcolm P. North;Malcolm P. North;Eric E. Knapp;Brandon M. Collins

  • Tamm Review: Reforestation for resilience in dry western U.S. forests

    Malcolm P. North;Malcolm P. North;Jens T. Stevens;Jens T. Stevens;David F. Greene;Michelle Coppoletta

  • Factors influencing fire severity under moderate burning conditions in the Klamath Mountains, northern California, USA

    Becky L. Estes;Eric E. Knapp;Carl N. Skinner;Jay D. Miller

  • Long-term overstory and understory change following logging and fire exclusion in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest

    Eric E. Knapp;Carl N. Skinner;Malcolm P. North;Becky L. Estes

  • Starting from Seed: Genetic Issues in Using Native Grasses for Restoration

    Eric E. Knapp;Kevin J. Rice

  • Genetic Structure and Gene Flow in Elymus glaucus (blue wildrye): Implications for Native Grassland Restoration

    Eric E. Knapp;Kevin J. Rice

  • Heterogeneity in fire severity within early season and late season prescribed burns in a mixed-conifer forest*

    Eric E. Knapp;Jon E. Keeley

  • Soil nutrients and microbial activity after early and late season prescribed burns in a Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest

    Sarah T. Hamman;Ingrid C. Burke;Eric E. Knapp

  • Pyrosilviculture Needed for Landscape Resilience of Dry Western United States Forests

    M P North;M P North;R A York;B M Collins;B M Collins;M D Hurteau

  • Tree mortality from fire and bark beetles following early and late season prescribed fires in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest

    Dylan W. Schwilk;Eric E. Knapp;Scott M. Ferrenberg;Jon E. Keeley

Frequent Co-Authors

Carl N. Skinner
Carl N. Skinner US Forest Service
Malcolm P. North
Malcolm P. North US Forest Service
J. Morgan Varner
J. Morgan Varner US Forest Service
Brandon M. Collins
Brandon M. Collins University of California, Berkeley
Jon E. Keeley
Jon E. Keeley United States Geological Survey
Scott L. Stephens
Scott L. Stephens University of California, Berkeley
Hugh D. Safford
Hugh D. Safford University of California, Davis
Kevin J. Rice
Kevin J. Rice University of California, Davis
Dylan W. Schwilk
Dylan W. Schwilk Texas Tech University
Alan H. Taylor
Alan H. Taylor Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse career options in science, education, and more. Online degrees make it easier than ever to gain expertise while maintaining flexibility. For those interested in historical contexts or environmental policy, earning one of the best online history masters can complement your scientific background and enhance research or teaching prospects.

Libraries frequently employ specialists with strong science knowledge. If you’re considering this career, you might wonder how much does it cost to become a librarian. Fortunately, online library science programs offer affordable pathways to become a science librarian or information specialist.

Communication and teaching skills are valued in environmental outreach and advocacy. There are asha approved slp programs online for those interested in speech-language pathology, an allied field with ecological implications in conservation communication and education.

For career changers or graduates without an SLP background, online bridge programs non-SLP majors offer a route into specialized roles. These pathways demonstrate how interdisciplinary learning—combined with online access—can launch your career in both direct ecological roles and related professions.

Best Scientists Citing Eric E. Knapp

Trending Scientists