World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
7596
World Ranking
5186
National Ranking
2316

Donna L. Hammond publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donna L. Hammond sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 116 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Donna L. Hammond D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donna L. Hammond sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donna L. Hammond is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States and has a scholarly focus primarily within the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their subfields of study include Physiology, Oncology, Dermatology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Pharmaceutical Science.

The scientist's research topics encompass Pain Mechanisms and Treatments, Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology, Chemotherapy-related skin toxicity, Ocular Surface and Contact Lens, Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery, Glaucoma and retinal disorders, and Ion channel regulation and function.

Donna L. Hammond has contributed to multiple journals, with publications appearing frequently in:

  • Pain
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • Brain Research
  • Neurotherapeutics

Their recent papers include:

  • "Nicotinamide riboside relieves paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy and enhances suppression of tumor growth in tumor-bearing rats," 2020, Pain
  • "Nicotinamide Riboside Alleviates Corneal and Somatic Hypersensitivity Induced by Paclitaxel in Male Rats," 2022, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • "CaMKII binding to GluN2B at S1303 has no role in acute or inflammatory pain," 2020, Brain Research
  • "Allan Basbaum: third Editor-in-Chief of PAIN and finding joy in pain research," 2025, Pain
  • "Meeting the Challenges in Pain Therapeutics Development," 2025, Neurotherapeutics

Donna L. Hammond has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Marta V. Hamity
  • Stephanie R. White
  • Christopher Blum
  • Katherine N. Gibson-Corley
  • Sandra J. Kolker

Best Publications

  • Chemokines and Glycoprotein120 Produce Pain Hypersensitivity by Directly Exciting Primary Nociceptive Neurons

    Seog Bae Oh;Phuong B. Tran;Samantha E. Gillard;Robert W. Hurley

  • Chloride Regulation in the Pain Pathway

    Theodore J. Price;Fernando Cervero;Michael S. Gold;Donna L. Hammond

  • Peripheral and central substrates involved in the rostrad transmission of nociceptive information.

    Tony L. Yaksh;Donna L. Hammond

  • The Analgesic Effects of Supraspinal μ and δ Opioid Receptor Agonists Are Potentiated during Persistent Inflammation

    Robert W. Hurley;Donna L. Hammond

  • Gabapentin and Pregabalin Can Interact Synergistically with Naproxen to Produce Antihyperalgesia

    Robert W. Hurley;Debika Chatterjea;Meihua Rose Feng;Charles P. Taylor

  • Efflux of 5-hydroxytryptamine and noradrenaline into spinal cord superfusates during stimulation of the rat medulla.

    D L Hammond;G M Tyce;T L Yaksh

  • Morphine or U-50,488 suppresses Fos protein-like immunoreactivity in the spinal cord and nucleus tractus solitarii evoked by a noxious visceral stimulus in the rat.

    Donna L. Hammond;Robert Presley;K. R. Gogas;Allan I. Basbaum

  • Antagonism of stimulation-produced antinociception by intrathecal administration of methysergide or phentolamine

    Donna L. Hammond;Tony L. Yaksh

  • Changes in expression of sensory organ-specific microRNAs in rat dorsal root ganglia in association with mechanical hypersensitivity induced by spinal nerve ligation

    Benjamin T. Aldrich;Eli P. Frakes;Junko Kasuya;Donna L. Hammond

  • Inhibitory actions of delta 1-, delta 2-, and mu-opioid receptor agonists on excitatory transmission in lamina II neurons of adult rat spinal cord

    Steven R. Glaum;Richard J. Miller;Donna L. Hammond

  • Alterations in nociceptirve threshold and morphine-induced analgesia produced by intrathecally administered amine antagonists

    Herbert K. Proudfit;Herbert K. Proudfit;Donna L. Hammond;Donna L. Hammond

  • Pharmacological antagonism of the antinociceptive effects of serotonin in the rat spinal cord

    Claudia Schmauss;Donna L. Hammond;James W. Ochi;Tony L. Yaksh

  • Effects of intrathecally administered THIP, baclofen and muscimol on nociceptive threshold

    Donna L. Hammond;Edward J. Drower

  • Effects of intrathecally administered methysergide and yohimbine on microstimulation-produced antinociception in the rat

    Nicholas M. Barbaro;Donna L. Hammond;Howard L. Fields

  • ROLE OF SPINAL GAMMA -AMINOBUTYRIC ACIDA RECEPTORS IN FORMALIN-INDUCED NOCICEPTION IN THE RAT

    Megumi Kaneko;Donna L. Hammond

  • GABAergic modulation of nociceptive threshold: effects of THIP and bicuculline microinjected in the ventral medulla of the rat

    Edward J. Drower;Donna L. Hammond

  • Developmental alterations in nociceptive threshold, immunoreactive calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P, and fluoride-resistant acid phosphatase in neonatally capsaicin-treated rats

    Donna L. Hammond;M. A. Ruda

  • Control Systems for Nociceptive Afferent Processing

    Donna L. Hammond

  • Functional aspects of bulbospinal monoaminergic projections in modulating processing of somatosensory information.

    Yaksh Tl;Hammond Dl;Tyce Gm

  • Contribution of Endogenous Enkephalins to the Enhanced Analgesic Effects of Supraspinal μ Opioid Receptor Agonists after Inflammatory Injury

    Robert W. Hurley;Donna L. Hammond

  • Systemic analgesic activity and .delta.-opioid selectivity in [2,6-dimethyl-Tyr1, D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin

    Donald W. Hansen;Awilda Stapelfeld;Michael A. Savage;Melvin Reichman

Frequent Co-Authors

Tony L. Yaksh
Tony L. Yaksh University of California, San Diego
Herbert K. Proudfit
Herbert K. Proudfit University of Iowa
Henry I. Mosberg
Henry I. Mosberg University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Andrew F. Russo
Andrew F. Russo University of Iowa
Allan I. Basbaum
Allan I. Basbaum University of California, San Francisco
Richard J. Miller
Richard J. Miller Northwestern University
Johannes W. Hell
Johannes W. Hell University of California, Davis
Gregg E. Homanics
Gregg E. Homanics University of Pittsburgh
Nicholas M. Barbaro
Nicholas M. Barbaro The University of Texas at Austin
Anne Z. Murphy
Anne Z. Murphy Georgia State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA opens the door to many dynamic and lucrative career options. In today’s digital age, online education makes it easier than ever to explore related fields—whether you’re seeking the best degrees to make money or aiming for a flexible, affordable path.

Many students consider enrolling in programs at the cheapest online colleges to reduce costs while earning a credential that supports a career in research, healthcare, or data science. For those looking to enhance their credentials quickly, there are online certifications available—many of which align with neuroscience-related roles such as clinical research or bioinformatics.

If you are starting your journey in neuroscience, you may prefer to begin with online college courses that offer transferable credits. This can help you discover areas of interest and gradually build up to more advanced study. No matter your starting point, online learning can set you on a rewarding path in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Donna L. Hammond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles