World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

David R. Shelly publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Shelly sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

David R. Shelly D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Shelly sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

David R. Shelly is a researcher affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with substantial contributions to the subfield of Geophysics. Additionally, they have engaged in areas intersecting with Computer Science, particularly Artificial Intelligence, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to their scientific inquiries.

The main themes of Shelly's work revolve around earthquake and tectonic studies, earthquake detection and analysis, seismology and earthquake studies, as well as high-pressure geophysics and materials. Further areas of investigation include seismic waves and analysis, geological and geochemical analysis, and seismic imaging and inversion techniques.

Recent publications highlight their involvement in seismic event cataloging and earthquake sequence characterization. Notable papers include:

  • "A High-Resolution Seismic Catalog for the Initial 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence: Foreshocks, Aftershocks, and Faulting Complexity" (2020, Seismological Research Letters)
  • "Rapid Characterization of the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, Earthquake Sequence" (2023, The Seismic Record)
  • "Geological constraints on the mechanisms of slow earthquakes" (2021, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment)
  • "Leveraging Deep Learning in Global 24/7 Real-Time Earthquake Monitoring at the National Earthquake Information Center" (2020, Seismological Research Letters)
  • "Rapid Source Characterization of the 2023 Mw 6.8 Al Haouz, Morocco, Earthquake" (2023, The Seismic Record)

Their frequent collaborators illustrate a consistent network of coauthorship, including:

  • William L. Yeck
  • P. S. Earle
  • Dara E. Goldberg
  • Robert J. Skoumal
  • Alexandra E. Hatem

David R. Shelly's work has appeared predominantly in several key scientific journals and venues:

  • The Seismic Record
  • Seismological Research Letters
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Through a combination of geophysical fieldwork, seismic data analysis, and computational methods such as machine learning, Shelly contributes to a better understanding of earthquake mechanisms and seismic activity monitoring at both regional and global scales. Their research crosses traditional disciplinary boundaries, integrating techniques from AI to enhance real-time earthquake detection and characterization.

Best Publications

  • Non-volcanic tremor and low-frequency earthquake swarms

    David R. Shelly;Gregory C. Beroza;Satoshi Ide

  • Low-frequency earthquakes in Shikoku, Japan, and their relationship to episodic tremor and slip

    David R. Shelly;Gregory C. Beroza;Satoshi Ide;Sho Nakamula

  • A scaling law for slow earthquakes

    Satoshi Ide;Gregory C. Beroza;David R. Shelly;Takahiko Uchide

  • Mechanism of deep low frequency earthquakes: Further evidence that deep non-volcanic tremor is generated by shear slip on the plate interface

    Satoshi Ide;David R. Shelly;Gregory C. Beroza

  • Fluid‐faulting evolution in high definition: Connecting fault structure and frequency‐magnitude variations during the 2014 Long Valley Caldera, California, earthquake swarm

    David R. Shelly;William L. Ellsworth;William L. Ellsworth;David P. Hill

  • Deep low‐frequency earthquakes in tremor localize to the plate interface in multiple subduction zones

    Justin R. Brown;Gregory C. Beroza;Satoshi Ide;Kazuaki Ohta

  • Earthquakes triggered by silent slip events on Kīlauea volcano, Hawaii

    Paul Segall;Emily K. Desmarais;David Shelly;Asta Miklius

  • Complex evolution of transient slip derived from precise tremor locations in western Shikoku, Japan

    David R. Shelly;Gregory C. Beroza;Satoshi Ide

  • A fluid-driven earthquake swarm on the margin of the Yellowstone caldera

    David R. Shelly;David P. Hill;Frédérick Massin;Jamie Farrell

  • Triggered creep as a possible mechanism for delayed dynamic triggering of tremor and earthquakes

    David R. Shelly;Zhigang Peng;David P. Hill;Chastity Aiken

  • Precise tremor source locations and amplitude variations along the lower‐crustal central San Andreas Fault

    David R. Shelly;Jeanne L. Hardebeck

  • High-resolution subducting-slab structure beneath northern Honshu, Japan, revealed by double-difference tomography

    Haijiang Zhang;Clifford H. Thurber;David Shelly;Satoshi Ide

  • Migrating tremors illuminate complex deformation beneath the seismogenic San Andreas fault.

    David R. Shelly

  • A High‐Resolution Seismic Catalog for the Initial 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence: Foreshocks, Aftershocks, and Faulting Complexity

    David R. Shelly

  • An autocorrelation method to detect low frequency earthquakes within tremor

    Justin R. Brown;Gregory C. Beroza;David R. Shelly

  • Non-volcanic Tremor: A Window into the Roots of Fault Zones

    Justin L. Rubinstein;David R. Shelly;William L. Ellsworth

  • Bridging the gap between seismically and geodetically detected slow earthquakes

    Satoshi Ide;Kazutoshi Imanishi;Yasuhiro Yoshida;Gregory C. Beroza

  • Rapid Characterization of the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, Earthquake Sequence

    Unknown

  • Tidal triggering of low frequency earthquakes near Parkfield, California: Implications for fault mechanics within the brittle‐ductile transition

    A.M. Thomas;R. Burgmann;David R. Shelly;Nicholas M. Beeler

  • Precise location of San Andreas Fault tremors near Cholame, California using seismometer clusters: Slip on the deep extension of the fault?

    David R. Shelly;William L. Ellsworth;Trond Ryberg;Christian Haberland

  • Erratum: Earthquakes triggered by silent slip events on Kīlauea volcano, Hawaii

    Paul Segall;Emily K. Desmarais;David Shelly;Asta Miklius

Frequent Co-Authors

David P. Hill
David P. Hill United States Geological Survey
Gregory C. Beroza
Gregory C. Beroza Stanford University
William L. Ellsworth
William L. Ellsworth Stanford University
Satoshi Ide
Satoshi Ide University of Tokyo
Roland Bürgmann
Roland Bürgmann University of California, Berkeley
Jeanne L. Hardebeck
Jeanne L. Hardebeck United States Geological Survey
Zhigang Peng
Zhigang Peng Georgia Institute of Technology
Clifford H. Thurber
Clifford H. Thurber University of Wisconsin–Madison
Paul A. Johnson
Paul A. Johnson Los Alamos National Laboratory
Robert B. Smith
Robert B. Smith University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Earth Science can open up diverse career pathways in fields like environmental management, geospatial analysis, and education. For those interested in expanding their communication skills alongside Earth Science, programs such as spanish degrees online offer affordable and efficient options that also enhance bilingual capabilities—a highly valued skill in global environmental sectors.

Veterans seeking to transition into Earth Science careers can find supportive options through online spanish bachelor degree for veterans programs. These are tailored to leverage military benefits while providing flexible learning paths conducive to their unique needs.

For creative professionals interested in integrating scientific insights with artistic expression, pursuing an online mfa can lead to innovative roles in science communication and visualization. Meanwhile, leadership and management opportunities in environmental organizations often benefit from advanced business skills gained through online masters programs in human resource management, facilitating effective team and resource management.

These diverse online educational paths complement traditional Earth Science studies, empowering students to tailor their careers to interdisciplinary and evolving industry demands.

Best Scientists Citing David R. Shelly

Trending Scientists