World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
7211
World Ranking
13860
National Ranking
5508

David Dagon publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Dagon sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 51 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David Dagon D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Dagon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Dagon is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their work spans various aspects of academic research and science, although specific details on recent publications, topics, or detailed fields of study are not provided in the available data.

No recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues are listed for David Dagon. Similarly, there is no record of book publications or defined main fields and subfields of study attributed to their research activity.

The data does not include information regarding notable awards or honors received by David Dagon. Their profile indicates an active academic presence without details on the specific scientific contributions or domains their research covers.

As this overview relies exclusively on the given source data, it reflects a concise factual snapshot focusing on affiliation and the absence of recorded bibliometric or topical information.

Best Publications

  • From throw-away traffic to bots: detecting the rise of DGA-based malware

    Manos Antonakakis;Roberto Perdisci;Yacin Nadji;Nikolaos Vasiloglou

  • Peer-to-peer botnets: overview and case study

    Julian B. Grizzard;Vikram Sharma;Chris Nunnery;Brent ByungHoon Kang

  • Building a dynamic reputation system for DNS

    Manos Antonakakis;Roberto Perdisci;David Dagon;Wenke Lee

  • Modeling Botnet Propagation Using Time Zones.

    David Dagon;Cliff Changchun Zou;Wenke Lee

  • PolyUnpack: Automating the Hidden-Code Extraction of Unpack-Executing Malware

    Paul Royal;Mitch Halpin;David Dagon;Robert Edmonds

  • A Taxonomy of Botnet Structures

    D. Dagon;Guofei Gu;C.P. Lee;Wenke Lee

  • Detecting malware domains at the upper DNS hierarchy

    Manos Antonakakis;Roberto Perdisci;Wenke Lee;Nikolaos Vasiloglou

  • Revealing botnet membership using DNSBL counter-intelligence

    Anirudh Ramachandran;Nick Feamster;David Dagon

  • Misleading worm signature generators using deliberate noise injection

    R. Perdisci;D. Dagon;Wenke Lee;P. Fogla

  • HoneyStat: Local worm detection using honeypots

    David Dagon;Xinzhou Qin;Guofei Gu;Wenke Lee

  • Mobile phones as computing devices: the viruses are coming!

    D. Dagon;T. Martin;T. Starner

  • Measuring intrusion detection capability: an information-theoretic approach

    Guofei Gu;Prahlad Fogla;David Dagon;Wenke Lee

  • Detecting Malicious Flux Service Networks through Passive Analysis of Recursive DNS Traces

    Roberto Perdisci;Igino Corona;David Dagon;Wenke Lee

  • Worm detection, early warning and response based on local victim information

    Guofei Gu;M. Sharif;Xinzhou Qin;D. Dagon

  • Corrupted DNS Resolution Paths: The Rise of a Malicious Resolution Authority

    David Dagon;Chris Lee;Wenke Lee;Niels Provos

  • Increased DNS forgery resistance through 0x20-bit encoding: security via leet queries

    David Dagon;Manos Antonakakis;Paul Vixie;Tatuya Jinmei

  • Can DNS›Based Blacklists Keep Up with Bots?

    Anirudh Ramachandran;David Dagon;Nick Feamster

  • Botnet Detection: Countering the Largest Security Threat

    Wenke Lee;Cliff Wang;David Dagon

  • Beheading hydras: performing effective botnet takedowns

    Yacin Nadji;Manos Antonakakis;Roberto Perdisci;David Dagon

  • Domain-Z: 28 Registrations Later Measuring the Exploitation of Residual Trust in Domains

    Chaz Lever;Robert Walls;Yacin Nadji;David Dagon

  • Increased DNS Forgery Resistance Through 0x20-Bit Encoding

    David Dagon;Manos Antonakakis;Paul Vixie;Tatuya Jinmei

Frequent Co-Authors

Wenke Lee
Wenke Lee Georgia Institute of Technology
Roberto Perdisci
Roberto Perdisci University of Georgia
Guofei Gu
Guofei Gu Texas A&M University
Nick Feamster
Nick Feamster University of Chicago
Giovanni Vigna
Giovanni Vigna University of California, Santa Barbara
Barton P. Miller
Barton P. Miller University of Wisconsin–Madison
Somesh Jha
Somesh Jha University of Wisconsin–Madison
Patrick McDaniel
Patrick McDaniel University of Wisconsin–Madison
J. Alex Halderman
J. Alex Halderman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lorrie Faith Cranor
Lorrie Faith Cranor Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open up numerous opportunities for students interested in Computer Science. For example, pursuing an online electrical engineering career outcomes pathway can lead to rewarding roles in technology, manufacturing, and research industries. These fields often overlap with computer science, creating diverse options after graduation.

Those looking for faster entry into the workforce might consider quick certifications that pay well. Certifications in areas like coding, cybersecurity, or data analytics can deliver competitive salaries with less time commitment compared to full degrees.

If you want to advance your education rapidly, many institutions now offer shortest masters degree programs online. These accelerated master’s degrees can often be completed in under 18 months, helping students move quickly into specialized careers.

Deciding what to study is critical. Reviewing the best masters degree to get helps ensure that you choose a program with high demand and solid career prospects, whether in computer science, engineering, or emerging tech domains.

Best Scientists Citing David Dagon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles