World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
38
Citations
6958
World Ranking
6384
National Ranking
456

Danijel Schorlemmer publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danijel Schorlemmer sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 183 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Danijel Schorlemmer D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danijel Schorlemmer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes

    Danijel Schorlemmer;Stefan Wiemer;Max Wyss

  • Earthquake Likelihood Model Testing

    D. Schorlemmer;M. C. Gerstenberger;S. Wiemer;D. D. Jackson

  • Acoustic emissions document stress changes over many seismic cycles in stick-slip experiments

    T. H. W. Goebel;D. Schorlemmer;T. W. Becker;G. Dresen

  • Earth science: microseismicity data forecast rupture area.

    Danijel Schorlemmer;Stefan Wiemer

  • Earthquake statistics at Parkfield: 1. Stationarity of b values

    D. Schorlemmer;S. Wiemer;M. Wyss

  • Identifying fault heterogeneity through mapping spatial anomalies in acoustic emission statistics

    T. H. W. Goebel;T. W. Becker;D. Schorlemmer;S. Stanchits

  • Probability of Detecting an Earthquake

    Unknown

  • Mapping asperities by minima of local recurrence time: San Jacinto‐Elsinore fault zones

    Max Wyss;Danijel Schorlemmer;Stefan Wiemer

  • First Results of the Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models Experiment

    Danijel Schorlemmer;J. Douglas Zechar;J. Douglas Zechar;Maximilian J. Werner;Edward H. Field

  • RELM Testing Center

    Unknown

  • Efficient testing of earthquake forecasting models

    David Rhoades;Danijel Schorlemmer;Danijel Schorlemmer;Matthew Gerstenberger;Annemarie Christophersen

  • Common dependence on stress for the two fundamental laws of statistical seismology

    Unknown

  • Analysis of the completeness magnitude and seismic network coverage of Japan

    K. Z. Nanjo;T. Ishibe;H. Tsuruoka;D. Schorlemmer

  • The Earthquake‐Source Inversion Validation (SIV) Project

    P. Martin Mai;Danijel Schorlemmer;Morgan T. Page;Jean-Paul Ampuero

  • Universal Quake Statistics: From Compressed Nanocrystals to Earthquakes

    Jonathan T. Uhl;Shivesh Pathak;Danijel Schorlemmer;Xin Liu

  • ALM: An Asperity-based Likelihood Model for California

    Stefan Wiemer;Danijel Schorlemmer

  • Stability and significance tests for b-value anomalies: Example from the Tyrrhenian Sea

    D. Schorlemmer;G. Neri;S. Wiemer;A. Mostaccio

  • The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability: Achievements and Priorities

    Danijel Schorlemmer;Maximilian J. Werner;Warner Marzocchi;Thomas H. Jordan

  • A completeness analysis of the National Seismic Network of Italy

    D. Schorlemmer;F. Mele;W. Marzocchi

  • Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models I: First-Order Results

    J. Douglas Zechar;Danijel Schorlemmer;Maximilian J. Werner;Maximilian J. Werner;Matthew C. Gerstenberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Wiemer
Stefan Wiemer Swiss Seismological Service
Max Wyss
Max Wyss University of Alaska Fairbanks
Fabrice Cotton
Fabrice Cotton University of Potsdam
Naoshi Hirata
Naoshi Hirata University of Tokyo
Cécile Cornou
Cécile Cornou Institut des Sciences de la Terre
John Clinton
John Clinton ETH Zurich
David D. Jackson
David D. Jackson University of California, Los Angeles
Antonio Pio Rinaldi
Antonio Pio Rinaldi Swiss Seismological Service
Donat Fäh
Donat Fäh Swiss Seismological Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities, but many students also explore complementary fields through online education. For example, pairing your Earth Science knowledge with a spanish degree online can enhance communication skills and expand job prospects in multinational environmental organizations.

Veterans looking to transition into Earth Science careers might find military-friendly options available. Programs such as military friendly online spanish degree programs offer flexible learning paths that accommodate their unique needs while building valuable language assets.

For those interested in combining creativity with science, enrollment in mfa online programs can provide skills in visualization and communication, crucial for environmental advocacy and education roles.

Additionally, supplementing technical expertise with management skills through a masters degree in human resource management online can prepare graduates for leadership positions in scientific organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Danijel Schorlemmer

Recently Published Articles